Self-Efficacy and Collective-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement in Group Conversation
Saved in:
| Title: | Self-Efficacy and Collective-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement in Group Conversation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Paul Leeming (ORCID |
| Source: | TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect. 2025 59(2):S115-S149. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 35 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Self Efficacy, Predictor Variables, Group Discussion, Learner Engagement, Cooperative Learning, Group Dynamics, Group Behavior, Task Analysis |
| DOI: | 10.1002/tesq.3412 |
| ISSN: | 0039-8322 1545-7249 |
| Abstract: | There is increasing interest in self-efficacy (SE) as a variable to predict learner behavior during tasks, but many tasks involve learners working collaboratively in groups. Collective efficacy (CE) can be used to assess the feelings of the group about their overall ability to complete a task. It has been largely ignored in the field of second language acquisition, despite its potential to help us understand learner performance in groups. In this study, conducted in a tertiary educational context in Japan (N = 205), Rasch analysis was used to investigate whether CE can be considered a distinct construct from SE among these participants. Data were then gathered at eight points over an entire academic year with learners working in fixed groups for each semester. SE and CE were measured on multiple occasions and used to predict behavioral and cognitive engagement in four separate 10-min discussion tasks. Results showed that CE was distinct from SE. Regression models showed that SE, rather than CE, predicted behavioral engagement in tasks. The relationship between cognitive engagement and the predictors depended on the specific task. The findings highlight the importance of SE and the group in influencing learners' task performance but also students' perceptions of the requirements of the task. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1492040 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1492040 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Self-Efficacy and Collective-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement in Group Conversation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Paul+Leeming%22">Paul Leeming</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-6555">0000-0003-1850-6555</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Justin+Harris%22">Justin Harris</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22TESOL+Quarterly%3A+A+Journal+for+Teachers+of+English+to+Speakers+of+Other+Languages+and+of+Standard+English+as+a+Second+Dialect%22"><i>TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect</i></searchLink>. 2025 59(2):S115-S149. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 35 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Discussion%22">Group Discussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Dynamics%22">Group Dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Behavior%22">Group Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/tesq.3412 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0039-8322<br />1545-7249 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: There is increasing interest in self-efficacy (SE) as a variable to predict learner behavior during tasks, but many tasks involve learners working collaboratively in groups. Collective efficacy (CE) can be used to assess the feelings of the group about their overall ability to complete a task. It has been largely ignored in the field of second language acquisition, despite its potential to help us understand learner performance in groups. In this study, conducted in a tertiary educational context in Japan (N = 205), Rasch analysis was used to investigate whether CE can be considered a distinct construct from SE among these participants. Data were then gathered at eight points over an entire academic year with learners working in fixed groups for each semester. SE and CE were measured on multiple occasions and used to predict behavioral and cognitive engagement in four separate 10-min discussion tasks. Results showed that CE was distinct from SE. Regression models showed that SE, rather than CE, predicted behavioral engagement in tasks. The relationship between cognitive engagement and the predictors depended on the specific task. The findings highlight the importance of SE and the group in influencing learners' task performance but also students' perceptions of the requirements of the task. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1492040 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1492040 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/tesq.3412 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 35 StartPage: S115 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Discussion Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Dynamics Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Self-Efficacy and Collective-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement in Group Conversation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Paul Leeming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Justin Harris IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0039-8322 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1545-7249 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 59 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |