EFL Teachers' Language Assessment Literacy and Their Assessment Practices: A Case Study from an Indonesian Higher Education Context

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: EFL Teachers' Language Assessment Literacy and Their Assessment Practices: A Case Study from an Indonesian Higher Education Context
Language: English
Authors: Indah Puspawati (ORCID 0000-0002-9577-1320), Sri Rejeki Murtiningsih (ORCID 0000-0002-7085-7902)
Source: Advanced Education. 2025 (27):60-80.
Availability: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute. 37 Peremohy Avenue, Building 7 Office 718, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine. Tel: +38-044-204-85-37; e-mail: ae.fl.kpi@gmail.com; Web site: https://kpi.ua/en
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Language Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, Assessment Literacy, College Faculty, Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Knowledge Base for Teaching, Ethics
Geographic Terms: Indonesia
ISSN: 2409-3351
2410-8286
Abstract: Research on EFL teachers' language assessment literacy (LAL) and its reflection in their assessment practices remains relatively limited. The current research aims to seek answers to the questions: (1) How did the five EFL teachers perceive their LAL knowledge, skills, and principles in their assessment context? (2) How were these components reflected in their assessment practices? A qualitative case study approach, involving five experienced EFL teachers in an Indonesian university, was employed. The data were collected through two in-depth semi-structured interviews and an analysis of participants' assessment documents. The interviews and document analysis explored participants' LAL and their assessment practices. The assessment documents were analyzed using conventional content analysis to investigate participants' actual assessment practices. The findings indicated that the participants' perceived LAL was not fully manifested in their assessment practices within this departmental context. The participants in this particular institutional context demonstrated the strongest understanding of LAL principles, followed by the skills and knowledge components, which revealed tensions among these components. Regarding assessment practices, the participants demonstrated competence in using various types of assessments aligned with institutional policies. However, discrepancies were identified between their LAL and actual practices, which may be influenced by external factors. Implications for the participants' future professional development were discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1492971
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Research on EFL teachers' language assessment literacy (LAL) and its reflection in their assessment practices remains relatively limited. The current research aims to seek answers to the questions: (1) How did the five EFL teachers perceive their LAL knowledge, skills, and principles in their assessment context? (2) How were these components reflected in their assessment practices? A qualitative case study approach, involving five experienced EFL teachers in an Indonesian university, was employed. The data were collected through two in-depth semi-structured interviews and an analysis of participants' assessment documents. The interviews and document analysis explored participants' LAL and their assessment practices. The assessment documents were analyzed using conventional content analysis to investigate participants' actual assessment practices. The findings indicated that the participants' perceived LAL was not fully manifested in their assessment practices within this departmental context. The participants in this particular institutional context demonstrated the strongest understanding of LAL principles, followed by the skills and knowledge components, which revealed tensions among these components. Regarding assessment practices, the participants demonstrated competence in using various types of assessments aligned with institutional policies. However, discrepancies were identified between their LAL and actual practices, which may be influenced by external factors. Implications for the participants' future professional development were discussed.
ISSN:2409-3351
2410-8286