Evaluation of a Co-Research Program: Optimising Engagement in Research

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of a Co-Research Program: Optimising Engagement in Research
Language: English
Authors: Ashley Scott (ORCID 0009-0009-0727-8914), Sophie Rowland, Aniqua Mehdi, Eric Rubenstein (ORCID 0000-0002-9146-4497)
Source: British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2026 54(1):28-38.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute on Aging (NIA) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R01AG073179
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Program Evaluation, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities, Down Syndrome, Inclusion, Medical Research, Research Assistants, Cooperation, Researchers, Participatory Research
DOI: 10.1111/bld.70012
ISSN: 1354-4187
1468-3156
Abstract: Background: Co-research methods have improved the inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities on research teams. This article presents the evaluation of the DS-TO-THE-MAX Co-Research Program to assess program process and outcomes. The team consists of co-researchers with Down syndrome and academic researchers who collaborate on health research projects important to the Down syndrome community. Methods: We developed a logic model to map program components and outcomes. From the model, we identified and assessed five key areas. We interviewed seven co-researchers with Down syndrome and conducted a focus group with research assistants based on key areas. We analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: We found that mutual recognition of contributions and multiple communication modes facilitated engagement and team connectedness. Co-researchers reported their interests and experiences drove contributions, and they saw benefits from collaborating with each other. Co-researchers noticed accessible team practices and described self-advocating. Though co-researchers did not explicitly identify as researchers, they reported making decisions and feeling heard and valued. They shared barriers such as difficult vocabulary. Conclusions: Our evaluation showed that relationships and co-researchers' experiences and interests were central to research engagement. Co-research team evaluations are feasible mechanisms to improve inclusive collaboration for research team members with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1496563
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Background: Co-research methods have improved the inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities on research teams. This article presents the evaluation of the DS-TO-THE-MAX Co-Research Program to assess program process and outcomes. The team consists of co-researchers with Down syndrome and academic researchers who collaborate on health research projects important to the Down syndrome community. Methods: We developed a logic model to map program components and outcomes. From the model, we identified and assessed five key areas. We interviewed seven co-researchers with Down syndrome and conducted a focus group with research assistants based on key areas. We analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: We found that mutual recognition of contributions and multiple communication modes facilitated engagement and team connectedness. Co-researchers reported their interests and experiences drove contributions, and they saw benefits from collaborating with each other. Co-researchers noticed accessible team practices and described self-advocating. Though co-researchers did not explicitly identify as researchers, they reported making decisions and feeling heard and valued. They shared barriers such as difficult vocabulary. Conclusions: Our evaluation showed that relationships and co-researchers' experiences and interests were central to research engagement. Co-research team evaluations are feasible mechanisms to improve inclusive collaboration for research team members with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
ISSN:1354-4187
1468-3156
DOI:10.1111/bld.70012