Resolving an Understanding Problem through an Extended Sequence

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Resolving an Understanding Problem through an Extended Sequence
Language: English
Authors: Chanyoung Park
Source: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL. 2025 25(2):1-20.
Availability: Teachers College, Columbia University. 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027. e-mail: tcsalt@tc.columbia.edu; Web site: https://tesolal.columbia.edu
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Korean, Native Speakers, Interpersonal Communication, Communication Problems
ISSN: 2576-2907
Abstract: This study investigates how a misunderstanding is sustained, escalated, and ultimately resolved through an extended trajectory of other-initiated repair in Korean conversation. Using a 45-minute phone call between two native speakers, the analysis traces how participants repeatedly return to a trouble source and deploy repair initiators that increase in specificity over time. The single-case analysis identifies three findings: (1) misunderstandings can remain relevant over long stretches of talk even after multiple topic shifts; (2) repair initiations may escalate from weaker to stronger formats across an extended sequence; and (3) a subset of assessments can function as indirect repair initiators by indexing epistemic trouble, a practice described as "doing-being-skeptical." Situating the case within cross-linguistic work on extended repair, the study advances understanding of how participants negotiate intersubjectivity beyond local adjacency. Limitations of the single-case design and implications for future research and language pedagogy are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1497699
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study investigates how a misunderstanding is sustained, escalated, and ultimately resolved through an extended trajectory of other-initiated repair in Korean conversation. Using a 45-minute phone call between two native speakers, the analysis traces how participants repeatedly return to a trouble source and deploy repair initiators that increase in specificity over time. The single-case analysis identifies three findings: (1) misunderstandings can remain relevant over long stretches of talk even after multiple topic shifts; (2) repair initiations may escalate from weaker to stronger formats across an extended sequence; and (3) a subset of assessments can function as indirect repair initiators by indexing epistemic trouble, a practice described as "doing-being-skeptical." Situating the case within cross-linguistic work on extended repair, the study advances understanding of how participants negotiate intersubjectivity beyond local adjacency. Limitations of the single-case design and implications for future research and language pedagogy are discussed.
ISSN:2576-2907