Evaluating the Association for the Accreditation of Architectural Education (MIAK) in Türkiye: A Comparative Analysis within the Framework of the Canberra Accord and UNESCO-UIA Standards
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating the Association for the Accreditation of Architectural Education (MIAK) in Türkiye: A Comparative Analysis within the Framework of the Canberra Accord and UNESCO-UIA Standards |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Guliz Ozorhon (ORCID |
| Source: | European Journal of Education. 2026 61(1). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Architectural Education, Accreditation (Institutions), Foreign Countries, Educational Quality, Quality Assurance, Academic Standards |
| Geographic Terms: | Turkey |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ejed.70375 |
| ISSN: | 0141-8211 1465-3435 |
| Abstract: | This study analyzes the Architectural Accreditation Board of Turkey (MIAK) within both national and international contexts. Using comparative content analysis, MIAK's criteria and procedures were evaluated against those of the UNESCO-UIA Charter and the member organisations of the Canberra Accord. The findings reveal that MIAK has significantly advanced the quality and international recognition of Turkish architectural education by aligning its standards with global frameworks. Strong convergence is observed in core areas such as design and technical competencies, while divergence remains in leadership and professional ethics. The study also identifies ambiguities in how these dimensions are articulated across international systems. By positioning MIAK within global accreditation discourse, the research highlights its contributions to educational quality assurance and professional harmonisation, while underscoring the need for greater emphasis on professional formation and ethical practice. This analysis fills a notable gap in comparative accreditation literature. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1497817 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | This study analyzes the Architectural Accreditation Board of Turkey (MIAK) within both national and international contexts. Using comparative content analysis, MIAK's criteria and procedures were evaluated against those of the UNESCO-UIA Charter and the member organisations of the Canberra Accord. The findings reveal that MIAK has significantly advanced the quality and international recognition of Turkish architectural education by aligning its standards with global frameworks. Strong convergence is observed in core areas such as design and technical competencies, while divergence remains in leadership and professional ethics. The study also identifies ambiguities in how these dimensions are articulated across international systems. By positioning MIAK within global accreditation discourse, the research highlights its contributions to educational quality assurance and professional harmonisation, while underscoring the need for greater emphasis on professional formation and ethical practice. This analysis fills a notable gap in comparative accreditation literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0141-8211 1465-3435 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ejed.70375 |
