Learning of Grammar-Like Sequences by Children with Developmental Language Disorder: An Electrophysiological Examination

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Learning of Grammar-Like Sequences by Children with Developmental Language Disorder: An Electrophysiological Examination
Language: English
Authors: Ziyi Cao (ORCID 0009-0008-0117-9969), Kelsey Black, Asiya Gul (ORCID 0000-0001-6743-598X), Lauren S. Baron (ORCID 0000-0002-4068-6479), Shivani Patel, Annika Lynn Schafer, Yael Arbel (ORCID 0000-0002-5749-393X)
Source: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2026 69(3):1033-1052.
Availability: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R01DC018295
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Children, Developmental Disabilities, Language Impairments, Grammar, Language Acquisition, Cognitive Processes, Brain, Individual Differences
Geographic Terms: Massachusetts
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals
DOI: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00107
ISSN: 1092-4388
1558-9102
Abstract: Purpose: Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition that affects approximately 7% of children in the United States. One notable characteristic of DLD is difficulty in mastering nonadjacent dependencies, such as the third-person singular "-s" or passive construction "be -ed." This study examines behavioral and electrophysiological measures of nonadjacent dependencies learning in children with DLD in the context of a visual grammar-like learning paradigm. Method: Fifty-one children (22 DLD, 29 typical language development [TD]) aged 8;0-12;4 (years;months) completed an aXb/cXd grammar learning task, followed by an immediate and 1-week follow-up test. Neurophysiological responses to grammatical and nongrammatical stimuli were measured by recording electroencephalography during the immediate test. Results: Children with and without DLD performed similarly and above chance level during the immediate test. Performance on the follow-up test indicated improved accuracy in children with TD. The DLD group, on the other hand, no longer exhibited above chance-level performance, pointing to limited consolidation. Event-related potentials extracted in relation to the grammaticality of the test items highlighted processing differences in responses to grammatical violations between the two groups (TD and DLD). While a P600 was found sensitive to grammatical violations in the TD group, a frontal N400-like activation was found sensitive to violations in the DLD group. These findings are interpreted to suggest familiarity-based associative learning rather than rule-based processing in children with DLD. Conclusion: Children with DLD achieved comparable scores on the immediate behavioral test as their TD peers but did not show evidence of rule abstraction and long-term retention.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1499709
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Purpose: Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition that affects approximately 7% of children in the United States. One notable characteristic of DLD is difficulty in mastering nonadjacent dependencies, such as the third-person singular "-s" or passive construction "be -ed." This study examines behavioral and electrophysiological measures of nonadjacent dependencies learning in children with DLD in the context of a visual grammar-like learning paradigm. Method: Fifty-one children (22 DLD, 29 typical language development [TD]) aged 8;0-12;4 (years;months) completed an aXb/cXd grammar learning task, followed by an immediate and 1-week follow-up test. Neurophysiological responses to grammatical and nongrammatical stimuli were measured by recording electroencephalography during the immediate test. Results: Children with and without DLD performed similarly and above chance level during the immediate test. Performance on the follow-up test indicated improved accuracy in children with TD. The DLD group, on the other hand, no longer exhibited above chance-level performance, pointing to limited consolidation. Event-related potentials extracted in relation to the grammaticality of the test items highlighted processing differences in responses to grammatical violations between the two groups (TD and DLD). While a P600 was found sensitive to grammatical violations in the TD group, a frontal N400-like activation was found sensitive to violations in the DLD group. These findings are interpreted to suggest familiarity-based associative learning rather than rule-based processing in children with DLD. Conclusion: Children with DLD achieved comparable scores on the immediate behavioral test as their TD peers but did not show evidence of rule abstraction and long-term retention.
ISSN:1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI:10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00107