Comparing the Impact of Individual- and Team-Based ChatGPT Collaboration on High School Students' Cognitive Competencies in Programming Education
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing the Impact of Individual- and Team-Based ChatGPT Collaboration on High School Students' Cognitive Competencies in Programming Education |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mahmood H. Hussein (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2026 42(2). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education Grade 12 |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, High School Students, Cognitive Processes, Programming, Teamwork, Cooperative Learning, Technology Uses in Education, Grade 12, Models, Individual Activities, Teaching Methods |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jcal.70226 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| Abstract: | Background: Increased research attention has recently been given to the topic of programming education, due to its significance in promoting students' critical thinking, complex problem-solving, creativity, and communication skills--commonly known as the '4Cs'. In particular, collaborative programming has been recognised as a promising instructional approach to promote students' cognitive competencies in programming education. However, simply offering students opportunities to collaborate will not necessarily improve their 4Cs. Thus, the potential of ChatGPT has been considered to address the drawbacks of conventional collaborative programming and to improve students' cognitive capabilities. Objective: To ascertain whether ChatGPT is a viable instructional tool in collaborative programming, this study proposes the ChatGPT-CIDI (Clarify, Ideate, Develop and Implement) learning model. Methods: A quasi-experimental method was implemented, wherein 61 students from two 12th-grade classes participated. One class (Group One) (n = 28, M[subscript age] = 17.25) was assigned to individual-based collaboration using the ChatGPT-CIDI model, while the second class (Group Two) (n = 33, M[subscript age] = 17.61) undertook team-based collaboration using the same model. Results and Conclusion: The empirical results demonstrated that this approach significantly improved students' critical thinking in Group One (individual-based), compared to Group Two (team-based). However, neither group experienced significant improvement in their complex problem-solving, creativity, or communication skills. This study concludes with implications for research and practice, while also indicating the research limitations to determine future research directions. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1500513 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1500513 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparing the Impact of Individual- and Team-Based ChatGPT Collaboration on High School Students' Cognitive Competencies in Programming Education – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mahmood+H%2E+Hussein%22">Mahmood H. Hussein</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-3907">0000-0001-9895-3907</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fatimah+Husayn+Amir+Aldeeb%22">Fatimah Husayn Amir Aldeeb</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-7009">0000-0001-8637-7009</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nor+Lisa+Sulaiman%22">Nor Lisa Sulaiman</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-3964">0000-0002-2070-3964</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Monther+M%2E+Elaish%22">Monther M. Elaish</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-2327">0000-0002-0983-2327</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. 2026 42(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programming%22">Programming</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teamwork%22">Teamwork</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Activities%22">Individual Activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/jcal.70226 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0266-4909<br />1365-2729 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Increased research attention has recently been given to the topic of programming education, due to its significance in promoting students' critical thinking, complex problem-solving, creativity, and communication skills--commonly known as the '4Cs'. In particular, collaborative programming has been recognised as a promising instructional approach to promote students' cognitive competencies in programming education. However, simply offering students opportunities to collaborate will not necessarily improve their 4Cs. Thus, the potential of ChatGPT has been considered to address the drawbacks of conventional collaborative programming and to improve students' cognitive capabilities. Objective: To ascertain whether ChatGPT is a viable instructional tool in collaborative programming, this study proposes the ChatGPT-CIDI (Clarify, Ideate, Develop and Implement) learning model. Methods: A quasi-experimental method was implemented, wherein 61 students from two 12th-grade classes participated. One class (Group One) (n = 28, M[subscript age] = 17.25) was assigned to individual-based collaboration using the ChatGPT-CIDI model, while the second class (Group Two) (n = 33, M[subscript age] = 17.61) undertook team-based collaboration using the same model. Results and Conclusion: The empirical results demonstrated that this approach significantly improved students' critical thinking in Group One (individual-based), compared to Group Two (team-based). However, neither group experienced significant improvement in their complex problem-solving, creativity, or communication skills. This study concludes with implications for research and practice, while also indicating the research limitations to determine future research directions. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1500513 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1500513 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/jcal.70226 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Programming Type: general – SubjectFull: Teamwork Type: general – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 12 Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Activities Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparing the Impact of Individual- and Team-Based ChatGPT Collaboration on High School Students' Cognitive Competencies in Programming Education Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mahmood H. Hussein – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fatimah Husayn Amir Aldeeb – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nor Lisa Sulaiman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Monther M. Elaish IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0266-4909 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1365-2729 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 42 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |