View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Speech-Language Pathology Social Communication Interventions for Autistic Children and Youth: A Scoping Review

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Speech-Language Pathology Social Communication Interventions for Autistic Children and Youth: A Scoping Review
Language: English
Authors: Maya Albin (ORCID 0000-0002-3689-4048), Michelle Phoenix, Peter Rosenbaum
Source: Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice. 2026 30(4):847-865.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Descriptors: International Organizations, Global Approach, Public Health, Classification, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Children, Youth, Intervention, Interpersonal Communication, Interpersonal Relationship, Models, Health, Disabilities
DOI: 10.1177/13623613251390609
ISSN: 1362-3613
1461-7005
Abstract: The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm in viewing autistic people's social communication holistically and in a strength-based manner. In this scoping review, we explored how social communication interventions for autistic children and youth map onto the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the field of speech-language pathology. OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Population, intervention and study data were extracted, as well as data on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains related to the social communication interventions. In total, 21 articles were included in our analysis. No studies explicitly mentioned the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. All the studies focused on participation and environmental factors (e.g., people's attitudes, physical environment), and some studies discussed other International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains such as body structures and functions, personal factors and activities. The examples provided for each International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domain may be helpful for clinicians and researchers looking to understand how components of social communication interventions link to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories. Future work could analyse how social communication interventions in other fields (e.g., psychology, occupational therapy) map onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1500984
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwEtwro1AF-aEtw4F6Jq5KCWAAAA4TCB3gYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHQMIHNAgEAMIHHBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDJSUI_QSZIh84ltmZAIBEICBmcBp52ueGE6vXBO7LhDkTGiiZhq54Dv1d3AkkQCr9_YFZbtOJxuQGyhFAKIyEwFy5xh3PGGzxPUDsytWkoyrzDU_QEaOXW6warnW_SdQEvi3hSssylrDjYKZcemyE_mWH1Rapy8K_87tfkvEVsYvQo8uav7jIOTdnD5ixZZjYuwmE13kylBYxiuBT_Ko-pPWUcHuVGubC_k9Gg==
Text:
  Availability: 1
  Value: <anid>AN0192433622;f9d01apr.26;2026Mar24.05:18;v2.2.500</anid> <title id="AN0192433622-1">Applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to speech-language pathology social communication interventions for autistic children and youth: A scoping review </title> <p>The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm in viewing autistic people's social communication holistically and in a strength-based manner. In this scoping review, we explored how social communication interventions for autistic children and youth map onto the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the field of speech-language pathology. OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Population, intervention and study data were extracted, as well as data on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains related to the social communication interventions. In total, 21 articles were included in our analysis. No studies explicitly mentioned the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. All the studies focused on participation and environmental factors (e.g., people's attitudes, physical environment), and some studies discussed other International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains such as body structures and functions, personal factors and activities. The examples provided for each International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domain may be helpful for clinicians and researchers looking to understand how components of social communication interventions link to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories. Future work could analyse how social communication interventions in other fields (e.g., psychology, occupational therapy) map onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. This review article investigates how the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health can be applied to better understand speech-language pathology social communication interventions. In recent years, academic articles have supported thinking differently about how autistic people communicate, including the many strengths autistic people have and how other people and the environment influence communication. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is a holistic, widely used framework that provides a neurodiversity-affirming perspective on social communication interventions for autistic children. We did not find any published literature applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to speech-language pathology social communication interventions for autistic children and youth and therefore wanted to explore whether and how social communication interventions reflect International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health concepts. To answer this question, we searched the academic literature using several databases using a methodology called a scoping review. We included articles that had autistic children and youth as participants and focused on social communication interventions in the field of speech-language pathology. We found 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria. No studies talked explicitly about the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. All the studies focused on participation and environmental factors (e.g., people's attitudes, physical environment), and some studies discussed other International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains such as body structures and functions, personal factors and activities. It is important for speech-language pathology social communication interventions to consider how the physical environment, social environment and personal factors impact social communication. Clinicians and researchers may find our application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to social communication interventions useful to shape how they think about interventions.</p> <p>Keywords: autism; children and youth; International Classification of Functioning; Disability and Health; social communication; speech-language pathology</p> <p>Frameworks of disability and health provide a lens through which to view people and societies, shaping service provision and attitudes related to disability. In the past two decades, the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has reframed how disability and health are conceptualized ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref1">93</reflink>]). The ICF provides a biopsychosocial framework to consider two major components of health – contextual elements (i.e., personal factors, environmental factors) and functioning and disability elements (i.e., body structures and functions, activities, participation), with bidirectional arrows connecting the domains to indicate their interconnectedness ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref2">93</reflink>]). Figure 1 shows a visual representation of the ICF. The five ICF domains provide a holistic perspective on a person's health by examining their body structures and functions (i.e., physical body parts, physiological and mental functions of a body), activities (i.e., execution of tasks), participation (i.e., involvement in life situations and society), personal factors (i.e., personal experiences including race, gender, age, preferences, culture) and environmental factors (i.e., any factor not inherent to the individual, including five subcategories of (<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref3">1</reflink>) products and technology, (<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref4">2</reflink>) environment and human-made changes to environment, (<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref5">3</reflink>) support and relationships, (<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref6">4</reflink>) attitudes and (<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref7">5</reflink>) services, systems and policies) ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref8">93</reflink>]).</p> <p>Graph: Figure 1. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) visual. Notes. From [<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref9">93</reflink>]. Arrows connect the domains, indicating bidirectional relationships between components. Image is from WHO documents and is licensed under Creative Commons, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.</p> <p>The ICF and its five domains can be applied generally, or by using specific sub-categories and alphanumeric codes organized into 'core sets' ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref10">93</reflink>]). ICF core sets include specific selections of ICF codes that were identified as relating to certain diagnoses, including autism ([<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref11">12</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref12">13</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib78" id="ref13">78</reflink>]). For example, the ICF core set for autism was developed in 2018 with the goal of standardizing assessment of functioning for autistic people in a variety of settings and includes 111 ICF categories ([<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref14">14</reflink>]). The ICF has inspired many tools and resources that can be used to support autistic youth[<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref15">8</reflink>]. For example, the Autism Classification System of Functioning: Social Communication (ACSF: SC) is a strength-based descriptive system based on the ICF that asks questions about a child/youth's social communication skills at their best and on a typical day ([<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref16">26</reflink>]). Other examples include the TEA-CIFunciona tool from Argentina that uses a synthesized version of the ICF autism core set to describe autistic children's functioning ([<reflink idref="bib68" id="ref17">68</reflink>]), and the 'your ideas about participation and environment' (YIPE) self-report tool that can be used to set goals or frame conversations between children with disabilities and healthcare providers ([<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref18">19</reflink>]).</p> <p>For autistic people, the ICF can be a helpful framework with which to explore the values and components of interventions, including social communication interventions that are commonly recommended for autistic children and youth. 'Social communication' refers to how and why language is used to communicate with others in social environments and is culture- and context-specific ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref19">3</reflink>]). Social communication includes social interaction and understanding, social cognition, verbal and nonverbal social behaviours (e.g., body language, tone of voice) and language processing ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref20">3</reflink>]). Service provision primarily focuses on children and youth, although some social communication interventions exist for autistic adults ([<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref21">24</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref22">29</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-2">Alignment between the ICF and the neurodiversity movement</hd> <p>Autistic people's social communication differences have historically been pathologized by people using a normative-focused medical model of disability, with many interventions aiming to remediate 'deficits' in the autistic person's social communication skills ([<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref23">6</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref24">44</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib45" id="ref25">45</reflink>]), including in the field of speech-language pathology (SLP) ([<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref26">38</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib91" id="ref27">91</reflink>]). In recent years, the neurodiversity movement and frameworks such as [<reflink idref="bib62" id="ref28">62</reflink>] double empathy problem have reframed autistic contributions to social communication as different rather than 'deficient' ([<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref29">36</reflink>]). Recent literature has emphasized the impact of personal and environmental factors on autistic people's social communication and the importance of using strength-based approaches ([<reflink idref="bib9" id="ref30">9</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref31">23</reflink>]). In addition to a shift in understanding, shifts in practice have been proposed to centre autistic people's perspectives, consider contextual factors and to move away from deficit-focused assessments and interventions ([<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref32">2</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref33">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref34">20</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib65" id="ref35">65</reflink>]).</p> <p>The ICF and the neurodiversity movement developed separately, yet both incorporate personal and environmental factors into goal setting and focus on strengths-based service delivery ([<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref36">13</reflink>]). The arrows connecting the ICF domains (Figure 1) align with recent literature outlining the interconnectedness of personal, sociocultural and sociopolitical, relational, interactional, and external factors in influencing a person's social communication abilities ([<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref37">10</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref38">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref39">20</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib86" id="ref40">86</reflink>]). For example, environmental factors align with the neurodiversity movement's description of the 'contextualization processes that devalue autistic ways of being and that render characteristics associated with autism disabling' ([<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref41">15</reflink>], p. 1599). Environmental factors also allow for the inclusion of different societal perspectives on autism and neurodiversity, as opposed to limiting our evidence base to only White, western scholarship ([<reflink idref="bib67" id="ref42">67</reflink>]).</p> <p>The ICF's personal and environmental factors domains also provide a framework to consider how culture influences perspectives on autism. In many Indigenous communities, perspectives on disability differ from White western deficits-based conceptualizations ([<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref43">5</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref44">17</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib41" id="ref45">41</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib53" id="ref46">53</reflink>]). In the Māori culture, for example, autism is referred to as 'Takiwatanga', translated to 'in their own time and space' ([<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref47">5</reflink>]). Perspectives on autism in some Indigenous communities may align with a social model of disability, although not labelled as such. For example, [<reflink idref="bib53" id="ref48">53</reflink>] described Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women's experiences of autism, and that although there were many challenges faced in daily life,</p> <p>most of the difficulties and stresses they spoke about were caused by their interactions with other people, services or institutions, not by their children. ([<reflink idref="bib53" id="ref49">53</reflink>], p. 44)</p> <p>In addition to exploring the alignment between the ICF and the neurodiversity movement, it is important to note criticism that the ICF overemphasizes impairment, rather than environmental factors, as the primary cause of disability ([<reflink idref="bib55" id="ref50">55</reflink>]). There is also criticism that the ICF classifies deviations from societal norms rather than focusing on human needs ([<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref51">35</reflink>]). [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref52">13</reflink>] addresses the perceived 'irreconcilable' relationship between the ICF and neurodiversity and outlines the many ways in which they can align and complement each other.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-3">The ICF in SLP literature</hd> <p>In addition to exploring how the ICF links to neurodiversity, it is important to explore whether and how existing SLP interventions already apply the ICF, both generally and for social communication services specifically. There is SLP literature discussing the ICF ([<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref53">11</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref54">56</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib59" id="ref55">59</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref56">79</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib85" id="ref57">85</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib91" id="ref58">91</reflink>]), including how activities and participation ([<reflink idref="bib70" id="ref59">70</reflink>]) and contextual factors ([<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref60">37</reflink>]) can be incorporated in SLP interventions. The ICF has been applied in specific SLP practice areas such as speech ([<reflink idref="bib59" id="ref61">59</reflink>]) and language disorders ([<reflink idref="bib91" id="ref62">91</reflink>]). The ICF is discussed explicitly by Speech-Language and Audiology Canada (SAC) in their position statement on outcome measurement ([<reflink idref="bib81" id="ref63">81</reflink>]) and on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA) website, which includes an ICF section and ICF-focused case studies ([<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref64">4</reflink>]). The ICF is also incorporated in SLP training programmes, such as at [<reflink idref="bib60" id="ref65">60</reflink>] SLP programme, which incorporates the ICF into all coursework and problem-based learning.</p> <p>For social communication particularly, there are social communication models in the SLP academic literature that incorporate the ICF ([<reflink idref="bib43" id="ref66">43</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib48" id="ref67">48</reflink>]) and literature acknowledging the impact of contextual factors on social communication ([<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref68">10</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref69">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref70">20</reflink>]). Yet, to date, the ICF has not been applied to analyse social communication interventions for autistic children and youth. Exploring how social communication interventions map onto ICF domains aligns with a broader shift in the field of SLP to ensure that interventions are holistic and neurodiversity-affirming ([<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref71">30</reflink>]). Although speech-language pathologists may be aware of the ICF and its components, they may not feel confident incorporating the concepts into clinical practice ([<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref72">79</reflink>]). Applying the ICF to social communication interventions and documenting the associated process may allow clinicians to expand their frameworks and implement a similar process to analyse the social communication interventions they use. A comprehensive review of SLP social communication interventions for autistic children and youth will also provide valuable information to clinicians and researchers on the common components of these interventions using the language of the ICF.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-4">Objective and research questions</hd> <p>The primary objective of this scoping review is to describe the SLP social communication intervention literature for autistic children and youth through the lens of the ICF. The focal research question was:</p> <p></p> <ulist> <item> <bold> Research Question 1: </bold> How do social communication interventions for autistic children and youth map onto the domains of the ICF in the field of speech-language pathology (SLP)?</item> </ulist> <p>In asking this question, we were interested in whether and how SLP social communication intervention concepts can be mapped onto the ICF concepts, and not simply whether ICF terminology was used.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-5">Method</hd> <p>A scoping review ([<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref73">7</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref74">52</reflink>]) was conducted to synthesize evidence, identify research gaps and disseminate knowledge regarding how social communication interventions in the field of SLP map onto the ICF. Scoping review principles, outlined by [<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref75">7</reflink>] and refined by [<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref76">52</reflink>], were followed to (a) identify research objectives; (b) search the literature for relevant studies; (c) select studies systematically; (d) chart the extracted data and (e) collate, summarize and report the results. This review is reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) by [<reflink idref="bib88" id="ref77">88</reflink>]. Search strategy and inclusion criteria documents were uploaded to [<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref78">27</reflink>], an open-access repository, in October 2024 prior to full-text screening and were made public in November 2024 (https://figshare.com/s/6e008854dd4277bf1267?file=49872516 & https://figshare.com/s/8e016c56bbcbe41065f7?file=49872489).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-6">Development of research question and objectives</hd> <p>The first author, a speech-language pathologist and doctoral student (M.A.), met regularly with PR, a paediatrician and scientist, to develop the research question as stated above. This project began as part of an ICF-focused course at McMaster University. A scientist and speech-language pathologist (M.P.) also provided feedback on the proposed research question and manuscript. Preliminary database searches of OVID Medline and Embase, Cochrane reviews and Google Scholar were conducted to ensure that no current reviews existed that answer this research question.</p> <p>Given the culturally dependent nature of social communication ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref79">3</reflink>]), the research questions and analysis are inherently influenced by the positionality of the authors. In our authorship team, all authors are Canadian, cisgender, neurotypical healthcare providers who have clinical experiences supporting autistic children and youth as speech-language pathologists (M.A. and M.P.) and as a paediatrician (P.R.) but are not autistic themselves. The research question was developed by M.A. in consultation with P.R., related to M.A.'s clinical experiences as a speech-language pathologist providing neurodiversity-affirming social communication assessment and intervention. McMaster University's ICF-focused course allowed M.A. to explore the ICF's utility as a clinical framework in the field of SLP and led to curiosity as to how the ICF could be applied to SLP social communication interventions.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-7">Search strategy to identify relevant studies</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0192433622-8">Database search</hd> <p>Following discussion by M.A. and P.R., a McMaster University health sciences librarian provided guidance and feedback on the research question, databases chosen and the search terms. Electronic searches of OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO and Web of Science were conducted in October 2024. Search terms were categorized as follows: children/youth, diagnosed with autism, social communication (e.g., social skills, pragmatic language), and speech-language pathology (e.g., speech-language therapy, SLP). Terms were modified slightly according to each database's properties. Table 1 shows an example of search terms used. Covidence was used to deduplicate, collate and review articles ('<emph>Covidence systematic review software</emph>', [<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref80">22</reflink>]).</p> <p>Table 1. Search terms from OVID Medline database.</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><colgroup><col align="left" /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left">Category</th><th align="left">Subject headings</th><th align="left">Keywords</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>(Population)</td><td>Autism Spectrum Disorder/Autistic Disorder/</td><td>autis<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.ASD.mp.Asperger<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.PDD NOS.mp.</td></tr><tr><td>(Population)</td><td /><td>Child<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Youth.mp.Toddler<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Teen<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Adolescen<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Pre-teen<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Pre-adolescen<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Kindergarten<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Preschool<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.</td></tr><tr><td>(Concept)</td><td>Social Skills/Social Interaction/Social Behaviour/</td><td>social<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref> competen<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref> communicat<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref> skill<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Pragmatic<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref> interact<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social cognition.mp.Social interven<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref> relat<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social cue<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Social behav<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.</td></tr><tr><td>(Context)</td><td>Speech-Language Pathology/Speech Therapy/</td><td>Speech lang<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Speech thera<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.SLP.mp.SLT.mp.Language ther<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.Communication ther<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2">*</xref>.mp.</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>1 Terms in each category were connected with 'OR', and each group was connected with 'AND'.</p> <p>2 = truncation, / = subject heading.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-9">Selection of relevant studies</hd> <p>Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed by the study team and refined. Two reviewers, M.A. and SLP student M.K., piloted and further refined the inclusion/exclusion criteria on 15 articles and then completed minor revisions to inclusion criteria as needed before proceeding with title and abstract screening. Studies were included if: (a) they included participants who were children and youth between the ages of 2 and 21 years; (b) participants were diagnosed with autism or other pre-<emph>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</emph> (5th ed.; DSM-V) terms (e.g., Aspergers, PDD-NOS); (c) social communication was listed as an aim and/or outcome of the intervention; and (d) there was SLP involvement in delivery, training or creation of the intervention. We focused on SLP literature to capture how speech-language pathologists specifically are approaching social communication intervention. Additional criteria included (e) peer-reviewed studies with full texts available in English and (f) published in or after 2001 – the year that the ICF was published ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref81">93</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-10">Charting and extraction of data</hd> <p>A data-charting form was created using Microsoft Excel and was modified following discussions with authors M.A. and P.R. [<reflink idref="bib74" id="ref82">74</reflink>] recommendations for data charting and extraction, synthesis, and analysis for scoping reviews were followed. The data extracted included direct quotations with a corresponding page number or paraphrasing longer sections of text along with a corresponding page number. Data extraction was guided by the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework ([<reflink idref="bib73" id="ref83">73</reflink>]). For <emph>population</emph> data, we extracted the ages, diagnoses, and the number of children/youth in the studies. <emph>Concept</emph> data included details on the studies/interventions, such as the study design, if any of the social communication terms used in the article were defined, and who delivered the intervention (e.g., only speech-language pathologists, other professionals as well).</p> <p> <emph>Context</emph> data explored how the intervention mapped onto the ICF. We extracted if the ICF was explicitly mentioned anywhere in the study, as well as which of the five ICF domains mapped onto the intervention purpose. We then analysed intervention content using the ICF by extracting and coding whether participation, activities (not otherwise captured by participation domain), body structures and functions (not otherwise captured by activities or participation), environmental factors, and/or personal factors were reported in intervention aims (i.e., what intervention strives to achieve, which can include purpose or goals) and/or outcomes (i.e., outcome measures used, outcomes authors report based on their intervention).</p> <p>Any data relevant to each ICF domain were extracted. Coders read and re-read each article and assessed which ICF domains were captured by extracting quotes and assigning a 'yes' or 'no' rating to represent the presence or absence of each ICF domain. The ICF was applied broadly, using the definitions of each ICF domain from the ICF manual to guide data extraction and coding ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref84">93</reflink>]). Coders extracted data from each article by evaluating which components of the social communication intervention related to each ICF domain. The study did not need to use ICF terminology to fit a specific domain; rather, the 'gestalt' of the definitions was applied to capture which domains were present and examples thereof. For example, 'activity' is the execution of tasks or actions by an individual, while 'participation' involves activities completed in the context of a life situation ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref85">93</reflink>]). Intervention content was coded as 'activity' when there was no mention of participation in a life situation (e.g., listening to facts about turn-taking), but coded as 'participation' if the context of a life situation was present (e.g., applying turn-taking information to a conversation with peers). For environmental factors, data were organized using the five ICF categories of environmental factors ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref86">93</reflink>]): (<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref87">1</reflink>) products and technology, (<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref88">2</reflink>) natural environment and human-made changes to the environment, (<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref89">3</reflink>) service systems and policies, (<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref90">4</reflink>) support and relationships and (<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref91">5</reflink>) attitudes ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref92">93</reflink>]). The data extraction table also included a section for reflection and additional thoughts not captured elsewhere on the extraction form. The only area of data extraction where ICF terminology was required was the question of whether the ICF was explicitly mentioned in the study.</p> <p>Data were extracted by two people. The first author (M.A.) extracted all the data on the Excel spreadsheet. An SLP student (M.E.) acted as a second coder and extracted data using the same document, marking any additions or disagreements in a different colour to track the percent agreement between the two reviewers. After both authors extracted data, they reviewed all data together and discussed any disagreements. Both authors agreed on over 98% of the data extracted, with only 10 of the 609 cells of data extracted having disagreements. All disagreements were resolved with discussion between the two reviewers. A third reviewer (M.P.) was available to adjudicate, but this was not required. Supplementary Materials, posted to Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/aa0d3bffe0d9dc8da010), show the raw extracted data spreadsheet.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-11">Synthesis of extracted data</hd> <p>Following data extraction, the completed Excel sheet was re-read several times by M.A. Descriptive data were summarized in tables and charts, and written summaries were created in Word documents to synthesize the data further. The ICF-related data (e.g., examples from each domain, the purpose of each study and the classification according to the ICF) were synthesized, using summaries written by M.A. that maintained attribution for all study data (i.e., study authors, page numbers). Data were copied and pasted from the Excel sheet into Microsoft Word, and the highlight function was used to identify common thematic groupings. Memoing was also completed by M.A. and M.E. using comments and a separate word document to help synthesize the data. The ICF data summary documents and highlighted themes were reviewed with the authorship team to discuss how data should be interpreted and reported and to ensure the entire authorship team agreed with how the data were classified in ICF domains. M.A., M.P. and P.R. all reached consensus on how to report the results.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-12">Results</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0192433622-13">Article selection</hd> <p>Once duplicates were removed, 1,354 titles and abstracts were screened. After screening 15 articles together to establish mutual understanding of inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers (M.A. and S.K.) independently screened over 10% of all titles and abstracts to establish reliability for title and abstract screening, both screening 143 articles. M.A. and S.K. had high inter-rater agreement (96% agreement; Cohen's κ = 0.65). Given the high inter-rater reliability and substantial agreement according to Cohen's Kappa ([<reflink idref="bib21" id="ref93">21</reflink>]), two reviewers proceeded with individually screening the remaining titles and abstracts. A third reviewer (M.P.) was available to adjudicate any disagreement throughout the screening process, which was not needed. Figure 2 shows a PRISMA flow chart. In total, 72 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Both reviewers screened four full texts together to ensure agreement on the inclusion and exclusion criteria at full text. Both reviewers then independently screened 10% of full texts (eight). They established 100% inter-rater agreement, and therefore, two reviewers proceeded with individual review of the remaining full texts. In total, 51 studies were excluded with reasons listed in the PRISMA flow chart (Figure 2), and a total of 21 studies were included.</p> <p>Graph: Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram.[<reflink idref="bib64" id="ref94">64</reflink>].</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-14">Population, intervention and study characteristics</hd> <p>Table 2 shows a summary of population, intervention and study data for the included articles. Studies were published between 2001 and 2024. In total, 536 children (age range = 1–12 years) participated across studies. Despite including specific search terms to capture youth (e.g., adolescent, teen, youth), none of the studies had participants older than age 12. As per our inclusion criteria, within each study at least 50% of participants included met criteria for autism. Consistent with the evolving terminology related to autism since 2001, diagnostic labels referring to autism varied and included ASD, autism, autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). Co-occurring diagnoses included intellectual disability (ID), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorder, Down syndrome, developmental coordinator disorder, epilepsy and/or seizure disorder. Studies were conducted in seven countries, most frequently the United States (<emph>N</emph> = 5) and Canada (<emph>N</emph> = 4). Studies were primarily quantitative (<emph>N</emph> = 15), with some qualitative (<emph>N</emph> = 1) and mixed methods (<emph>N</emph> = 5) studies. Study designs varied widely, including randomized control trials ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref95">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref96">80</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref97">92</reflink>]), nonrandomized control trials ([<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref98">72</reflink>]), multiple baseline or case studies ([<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref99">28</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref100">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref101">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref102">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref103">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref104">89</reflink>]), studies comparing pre- and post-intervention outcomes for two groups ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref105">51</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref106">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref107">63</reflink>]), pilot studies ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref108">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref109">66</reflink>]), a programme evaluation ([<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref110">61</reflink>]), a single-arm feasibility study ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref111">1</reflink>]), a quasi-experimental design ([<reflink idref="bib82" id="ref112">82</reflink>]), a programme report ([<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref113">77</reflink>]) and an exploratory intervention study ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref114">57</reflink>]). The qualitative study was an implementation study ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref115">32</reflink>]).</p> <p>Table 2. Population, intervention and study data.</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><colgroup><col align="left" /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left">Citation</th><th align="left" colspan="3">Population data</th><th /><th align="left" colspan="6">Intervention and study data</th></tr><tr><th align="left">First author and year</th><th align="left">Child age range (years)</th><th align="left">Diagnoses reported & terminology used</th><th align="left">Number of children<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn4">a</xref></th><th align="left">Details on clinicians providing intervention<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn5">b</xref></th><th align="left">Social communication (SC) terms used</th><th align="left">SC term defined?</th><th align="left">Country of study</th><th align="left">Intervention name</th><th align="left">Manualized?</th><th align="left">Study design</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr54">Lim et al. (2007)</xref></td><td>5–7</td><td>'High-functioning ASD' or language delay</td><td>10</td><td>SLP & OT co-facilitating</td><td>Social behaviour</td><td>Y</td><td>Singapore</td><td>'Pilot clinic-based social skills group'</td><td>NR</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr40">Hutchins & Prelock (2013)</xref></td><td>4–12</td><td>ASD, PDD-NOS, Autistic disorder</td><td>20</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Communication skills</td><td>N</td><td>The United States</td><td>Social Stories</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr32">Godoy et al. (2024)</xref></td><td>2–10</td><td>Autism, autism + ID</td><td>15</td><td>SLPs + other disciplines (OT, medicine, psychology)</td><td>Social + communication, development, behaviour, abilities</td><td>N</td><td>Brazil</td><td>Paediatric Autism Communication Therapy (PACT)</td><td>Y</td><td>Qual</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr57">MacEvilly et al. (2024)</xref></td><td>8–12</td><td>Autism or autism + ADHD, anxiety</td><td>51</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Social + skills, behaviour, competence</td><td>N</td><td>Ireland</td><td>Secret Agent Society (SAS)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr31">Girolametto et al. (2007)</xref></td><td>2–3</td><td>Autism, PDD-NOS</td><td>3</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Social interaction</td><td>Y</td><td>Canada</td><td>More Than Words (MTW)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr66">Müller et al. (2016)</xref></td><td>7–10</td><td>ASD, ASD + ADHD, PDD-NOS + ADHD</td><td>4</td><td>SLPs + other disciplines (teacher, OT, social worker)</td><td>Social cognition</td><td>Y</td><td>United States</td><td>Conversation Club Curriculum</td><td>NR</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr51">Lerna et al. (2012)</xref></td><td>1–5</td><td>Autism</td><td>18</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Socio-communicative abilities</td><td>N</td><td>Italy</td><td>Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr39">Hutchins & Prelock (2006)</xref></td><td>6–12</td><td>ASD</td><td>2</td><td>SLPs supervising SLP graduate students</td><td>Social cognition</td><td>N</td><td>The United States</td><td>Social Stories & Conversation Comic Strips</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr63">Mohammadzaheri et al. (2022)</xref></td><td>6–12</td><td>ASD & mild to moderate ID</td><td>20</td><td>SLPs supervising SLP graduate students</td><td>Social initiation</td><td>N</td><td>Iran</td><td>Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT)</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr50">Lerna et al. (2014)</xref></td><td>1–6</td><td>Autism</td><td>14</td><td>'Specialists in SLP with extensive expertise with ASD'</td><td>Social-communicative abilities</td><td>Y</td><td>Italy</td><td>Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr18">Casenhiser et al. (2013)</xref></td><td>2–4</td><td>ASDs</td><td>51</td><td>SLPs or OTs</td><td>Social interaction</td><td>Y</td><td>Canada</td><td>Milton & Ethel Harris Research Initiative Treatment (MEHRIT) Programme</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr28">Franco et al. (2013)</xref></td><td>5–8</td><td>Autism, autism + seizure disorder</td><td>6</td><td>SLP + BCBA</td><td>Intentional communication</td><td>Y</td><td>The United States</td><td>Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching (PMT)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr61">Miletic et al. (2024)</xref></td><td>3–8</td><td>ASD</td><td>31</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Social communication skills, play skills</td><td>Y</td><td>Canada</td><td>More Than Words (MTW)</td><td>Y</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr72">Pereira et al. (2022)</xref></td><td>3–6</td><td>ASD or DLD</td><td>20</td><td>SLTs only</td><td>Pragmatic skills</td><td>Y</td><td>Portugal</td><td>Pragmatic Intervention Programme (PICP)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr89">van der Meer et al. (2014)</xref></td><td>10</td><td>ASD + ID + epilepsy + DCD</td><td>1</td><td>SLP + support worker</td><td>Social communication, communicative interactions</td><td>N</td><td>New Zealand</td><td>Preference-enhanced communication intervention</td><td>NR</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr1">Adams et al. (2020)</xref></td><td>5–10</td><td>ASD</td><td>20</td><td>SLTs + 'special needs teacher'</td><td>Pragmatic competence, social communication</td><td>N</td><td>The United Kingdom</td><td>Social Communication Intervention Programme (SCIP)</td><td>Y</td><td>Mixed</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr77">Salt et al. (2001)</xref></td><td>NR</td><td>Autism</td><td>87</td><td>SLPs + other disciplines (OTs, teachers, nursery nurses)</td><td>Social + awareness, interaction, skills</td><td>N</td><td>Scotland</td><td>Scottish Centre for Autism Preschool Treatment Programme</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr92">Williams et al. (2024)</xref></td><td>3</td><td>Autism</td><td>27</td><td>SLTs only</td><td>Social + communication, responses, initiations</td><td>Y</td><td>The United Kingdom</td><td>Music Assisted Programme (MAP)</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr82">Sun et al. (2017)</xref></td><td>5–12</td><td>ASD</td><td>20</td><td>SLPs only</td><td>Functional communication, social cognitive performance</td><td>Y</td><td>Brazil</td><td>Simulation of Executive Functions (SEF)</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr80">Shire et al. (2017)</xref></td><td>2–3</td><td>ASD</td><td>113</td><td>SLPs + other disciplines (social workers, OTs)</td><td>Social communication, play skills</td><td>Y</td><td>The United States</td><td>jasPEER, adaptation of Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement and Regulation (JASPER)</td><td>Y</td><td>Quant</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr47">Katz & Girolametto (2013)</xref></td><td>4–5</td><td>ASD</td><td>3</td><td>SLP + ECE</td><td>Engagement in a social interaction</td><td>Y</td><td>Canada</td><td>Peer-mediated intervention programme</td><td>NR</td><td>Quant</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <ulist> <item>3 <emph>Notes.</emph> NR = not reported; <emph>N</emph> = sample size; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; PDD-NOS = pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified; ID = intellectual disability; DLD = Developmental Language Disorder; DCD = Developmental Coordination Disorder; ADHD = attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; SLP = speech-language pathologist; SLT = speech-language therapist; OT = occupational therapist; BCBA = Board Certified Behaviour Analyst; ECE = Early Childhood Educator; Qual = qualitative data; Quant = quantitative data; Mixed = mixed methods study (i.e., qualitative and quantiative methods).</item> <item>4 Sample size listed includes all children, including both autistic and nonautistic participants. All studies needed to have at least 50% autistic participants. We only included participants that continued throughout the entire study (e.g., excluded participants who were recruited but dropped out).</item> <item>5 We included interventions requiring SLP involvement either in carrying out the intervention, supervising those carrying out the intervention or developing the intervention. SLP involvement had to be listed in some capacity for an intervention to be included.</item> </ulist> <p>In addition to speech-language pathologists, most studies involved other disciplines (e.g., occupational therapists, music therapists, teachers) and/or SLP students in intervention delivery (<emph>N</emph> = 13). Eight studies had only speech-language pathologists delivering the intervention to children and families. Some interventions were reported in multiple studies, including More Than Words (<emph>N</emph> = 2) and the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) (<emph>N</emph> = 2). Ten studies reported that their interventions were manualized, and 11 studies did not report any details about whether their interventions were manualized.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-15">Social communication terminology and definitions</hd> <p>All studies discussed social communication concepts related to their interventions (e.g., social skills, social behaviour, pragmatic language). Table 1 shows search terms used for the concept of social communication. The terminology used to refer to social communication varied widely across studies, including whether the terms were defined, as detailed in Table 2. The most common term was 'social' combined with other words, such as 'behaviour', 'communication', 'skills', 'competence', 'cognition', 'initiation', 'interaction', 'awareness' and 'responses'. Other terms included the concept of play skills, functional communication or pragmatic skills and/or competence. Most studies used multiple social communication-related terms throughout their paper. Nine studies did not define any of the social communication terms that they used in their papers, including in the introduction, methods or other sections. Twelve studies did define at least one of the social communication terms they used. Table 2 shows further details.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-16">ICF characteristics</hd> <p>Table 3 provides an overview of the ICF data for all studies. None of the 21 studies explicitly referenced the ICF ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref116">93</reflink>]). All data were extracted in reference to the child (e.g., personal factors of the child, participation of the child). For interventions that had multiple areas of focus, only data related to social communication was extracted. For example, [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref117">40</reflink>] used social stories to target social communication but also to target behaviours unrelated to communication with children (e.g., toileting, dressing).</p> <p>Table 3. ICF components present in the studies.</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><colgroup><col align="left" /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /><col align="char" char="." /></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left">Citation</th><th align="left">Body structures and functions</th><th align="left">Participation</th><th align="left">Activities (not involving participation)</th><th align="left">Personal factors</th><th align="left">Environmental factors</th><th align="left">Subcategories of environmental factors<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7">a</xref></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr1">Adams et al. (2020)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,4,5</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr18">Casenhiser et al. (2013)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr28">Franco et al. (2013)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr31">Girolametto et al. (2007)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>3,4</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr32">Godoy et al. (2024)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3,4,5</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr39">Hutchins & Prelock (2006)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3,5</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr40">Hutchins & Prelock (2013)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,3,5</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr47">Katz & Girolametto (2013)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr51">Lerna et al. (2012)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr50">Lerna et al. (2014)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr54">Lim et al. (2007)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3,4</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr57">MacEvilly et al. (2024)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr61">Miletic et al. (2024)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3,4,5</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr63">Mohammadzaheri et al. (2022)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr66">Müller et al. (2016)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr72">Pereira et al. (2022)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr77">Salt et al. (2001)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3,4</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr80">Shire et al. (2017)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr82">Sun et al. (2017)</xref></td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr89">van der Meer et al. (2014)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3</td></tr><tr><td><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bibr92">Williams et al. (2024)</xref></td><td /><td>✓</td><td /><td>✓</td><td>✓</td><td>1,2,3,4</td></tr><tr><td>Totals (out of 21)</td><td>8</td><td>21</td><td>6</td><td>19</td><td>21</td><td>N/A</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <ulist> <item>6 <emph>Note.</emph> A check mark indicates that the social communication intervention data mapped onto a particular ICF domain in each paper.</item> <item>7 Subcategories of environmental factors include (<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref118">1</reflink>) products and technology; (<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref119">2</reflink>) natural environment and human-made changes to environment; (<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref120">3</reflink>) support and relationships; (<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref121">4</reflink>) attitudes and (<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref122">5</reflink>) services, systems and policies.</item> </ulist> <hd id="AN0192433622-17">Intervention aims and ICF domains</hd> <p>We analysed the intervention aims using the ICF as a lens and extracted any relevant ICF domains for each intervention's aims. The aims for each intervention were often categorized into multiple ICF domains. In total, 20 of the 21 interventions had a participation-related aim. Only [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref123">32</reflink>] did not report a participation-focused aim but focused on the environmental factor of parent behaviour change. Interventions varied widely regarding their participation-related aims, with some listing specific intervention aims such as children selecting topics of mutual interest or asking follow-up questions (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref124">66</reflink>]), while other studies mentioned general aims such as children learning 'how to understand and manage social interaction' ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref125">57</reflink>], p. 58) or 'enhance social and communicative skills' ([<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref126">50</reflink>], p. 479).</p> <p>Five studies included changes in environmental factors as aims, including equipping parents with the necessary skills to continue the intervention ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref127">54</reflink>]); increasing parental sensitivity and responsivity with their children ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref128">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref129">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref130">61</reflink>]) and promoting skill generalization in multiple environments (e.g., home vs. kindergarten, peers vs. teachers) ([<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref131">72</reflink>]). Two studies ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref132">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref133">57</reflink>]) had body structures/functions aims, including 'emotional regulation' ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref134">57</reflink>], p. 58) and 'remediating the social, behavioral, and communicative impairments characteristic of autism spectrum disorder' ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref135">39</reflink>], p. 47). Two studies mentioned activities not in the context of participation, specifically improving abilities such as '[concentrating] on given tasks... following instructions' ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref136">54</reflink>], p. 35) and improving 'theoretical knowledge of anxiety and anger management strategies' ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref137">57</reflink>], p. 69).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-18">Body structures and functions</hd> <p>Eight papers included body structure and function components in their interventions. For information to be listed under body structures and functions, it was not discussed in the context of activities or participation. Examples included psychological and cognitive changes such as deep breathing or self-talk to manage emotions ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref138">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref139">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref140">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref141">77</reflink>]); improving the theory-of-mind, described as the 'root cause of the core deficits characteristic of ASD' ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref142">39</reflink>], p. 49); requiring eye contact for a set number of seconds ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref143">51</reflink>]); increasing vocabulary size ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref144">31</reflink>]); changing responses to sensory stimuli ([<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref145">77</reflink>]) or improving basic cognitive processes such as inhibitory control ([<reflink idref="bib82" id="ref146">82</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-19">Activities</hd> <p>Six studies reported activities not in the context of participation, including children completing social skills homework ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref147">54</reflink>]), playing independently in a 'typical' way ([<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref148">40</reflink>]), activities based on specific cognitive skills (e.g., memorizing sequences of coloured tokens for working memory or copying mosaic patterns for inhibitory control) ([<reflink idref="bib82" id="ref149">82</reflink>]) and increasing knowledge of social communication strategies or facts without applying them in social contexts ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref150">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref151">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref152">89</reflink>]). For example, [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref153">57</reflink>] measured children's knowledge of social communication strategies, without capturing whether children's knowledge of strategies changed their social behaviour. One study ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref154">18</reflink>]) discussed how they modified an outcome measure to change the focus from activities to participation, explaining:</p> <p>our modification to the coding specified that the activity take place in the context of an interaction with the caregiver... without the modification, a child who repetitively lines up cars while ignoring the parent might ostensibly score high in attention to interactive activity or involvement (p. 227).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-20">Participation</hd> <p>All studies had participation components in their interventions. Examples varied widely across studies, but there were several common aspects of participation. Most studies discussed intervention components to increase the child's social initiation, including initiation of play with another person, asking questions, making comments, initiation of requests or using nonverbal communication such as physically approaching peers, picture exchange or speech-generating devices ([<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref155">28</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref156">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref157">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref158">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref159">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref160">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref161">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref162">63</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref163">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref164">72</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref165">77</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib82" id="ref166">82</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref167">89</reflink>]). Many studies discussed children reciprocating in play or conversations, including concepts such as turn-taking, 'back and forth' conversation, participation in group games and engaging in back and forth songs ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref168">1</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref169">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref170">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref171">51</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref172">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref173">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref174">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref175">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref176">72</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref177">80</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib82" id="ref178">82</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref179">89</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref180">92</reflink>]).</p> <p>Other participation concepts included children developing friendships ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref181">1</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref182">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref183">54</reflink>]), maintaining conversation topics ([<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref184">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref185">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref186">66</reflink>]), managing social scenarios requiring problem-solving and managing their emotions (e.g., winning and losing, repairing communication breakdowns, conflict resolution, coping with mistakes) ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref187">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref188">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref189">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref190">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref191">80</reflink>]) and reducing 'negative' social behaviours such as interrupting ([<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref192">40</reflink>]) or 'insisting that others continue an activity' ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref193">39</reflink>], p. 55). Additional concepts included modulating nonverbal communication such as speech volume ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref194">54</reflink>]) or behaviours to show listening, including eye contact ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref195">51</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref196">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref197">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref198">77</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-21">Environmental factors</hd> <p>All studies discussed environmental factors. Most mentioned support and relationships, such as parent involvement to support intervention strategies ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref199">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref200">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref201">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref202">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref203">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref204">77</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref205">92</reflink>]). [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref206">61</reflink>] discussed support and relationships from people outside of parents, including support from other family members in implementing child-led strategies or parents benefitting from support from other parents in the intervention to reflect on their own use of strategies. Some studies discussed peers rather than parents providing support to carry out interventions ([<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref207">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref208">80</reflink>]). Products and technology were commonly mentioned, including intervention tools such as books or social stories ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref209">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref210">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref211">47</reflink>]), video games ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref212">57</reflink>]), visual materials ([<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref213">66</reflink>]), augmentative and alternative communication tools ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref214">51</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref215">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref216">89</reflink>]) or parents watching video recordings of their own interactions with their child ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref217">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref218">61</reflink>]). Some products discussed were related to positive or negative reinforcement for children (e.g., providing toys, token system, star chart for 'good behaviour') ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref219">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref220">63</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref221">66</reflink>]). Some interventions required technology for their online service delivery ([<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref222">61</reflink>]) or used phone apps for parents to track their home practice ([<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref223">92</reflink>]).</p> <p>Examples of natural and human-made changes to the environment included actions to generalize gains to new environments (e.g., new people, new physical spaces) ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref224">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref225">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref226">72</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref227">77</reflink>]) or discussed as a limitation when generalization did not occur ([<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref228">63</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref229">89</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref230">80</reflink>]). Many studies discussed their intervention occurring in children's natural environments such as at home or school ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref231">1</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref232">28</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref233">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref234">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref235">72</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref236">92</reflink>]). Environmental changes were also discussed in relation to service delivery changes due to COVID-19 ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref237">32</reflink>]). One study also discussed changes to the environment to facilitate a child's regulation, including lighting changes or providing sensory equipment such as swings ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref238">18</reflink>]). Attitudes were discussed in relation to parents changing their attitudes about their child's social communication skills and what intervention activities and service delivery models can best support skill development ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref239">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref240">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref241">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref242">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref243">92</reflink>]). Attitude changes also included changing their knowledge and attitudes towards autism ([<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref244">77</reflink>]).</p> <p>Services, systems and policies were difficult to categorize, as only three studies discussed these factors impacting intervention components. Examples included challenges applying the intervention due to differing cultural beliefs about parent involvement in intervention ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref245">32</reflink>], p. 131); the COVID-19 pandemic preventing parents from applying intervention activities outside of their immediate family ([<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref246">61</reflink>]) and challenges delivering interventions at home compared to at school ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref247">1</reflink>]). Many studies provided valuable background information on how services, systems and policies in their contexts (whether country, city or health system) impacted how the intervention came to be. Details included describing the health system or organization to which an intervention was tied and how it operates ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref248">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref249">51</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref250">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref251">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref252">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref253">77</reflink>]); how the laws of a specific country impact the services for which children with disabilities are eligible ([<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref254">89</reflink>]) or what other health and rehabilitation services children received in addition to the described intervention ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref255">18</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-22">Personal factors</hd> <p>Nineteen studies discussed personal factors. Examples included considering how a child's school activities overlap with intervention activities ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref256">54</reflink>]) or identifying how each child's strengths, challenges and interests inform intervention goals and/or activities ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref257">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref258">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref259">50</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref260">61</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref261">63</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref262">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref263">72</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib80" id="ref264">80</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref265">89</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib92" id="ref266">92</reflink>]). Many studies asked parents about personal factors as part of demographic information, including children's living arrangements, childcare status (e.g., daycare or in-home, months attending childcare), siblings or parent characteristics such as their employment, mental health or marital status ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref267">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref268">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref269">47</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib77" id="ref270">77</reflink>]). No studies had children report their own interests or goals, even when studies had children fill out other information, such as homework ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref271">54</reflink>]). Some studies discussed children's individual sensory, physical or emotional profiles to ensure that interventions were tailored to their physical needs ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref272">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref273">28</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-23">Connections between ICF domains</hd> <p>There were connections identified between components of the ICF. For example, participation was sometimes related to personal factors (e.g., personal experiences, characteristics or preferences), such as selecting personally interesting topics of conversation ([<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref274">66</reflink>]) or considering personal factors to create more engaging interventions that increase the child's participation ([<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref275">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib63" id="ref276">63</reflink>]). Body structures and functions were combined with participation to describe making eye contact with a communication partner ([<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref277">66</reflink>]) or using emotional regulation strategies in real-world situations or teaching parents to support co-regulation ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref278">18</reflink>]).</p> <p>Some interventions that had changes in environmental factors as intervention aims (e.g., parent behaviour change) discussed child participation changes as outcomes. For example, [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref279">32</reflink>] did not mention participation as an objective but did discuss intervention outcomes such as the child approaching other children and initiating communication as outcomes of their parent-focused intervention. More Than Words, a social communication intervention for autistic children focused on parent training, had some participation aims but was mostly environment-focused, given that it targets parental behaviour change to create supportive social communication environments for children. For studies discussing More Than Words ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref280">31</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref281">61</reflink>]), the focal intervention aims are related to parents' behaviour change, yet the changes in child participation were mentioned as key outcomes. Another example of participation relating to environmental factors was the role of the COVID-19 pandemic impacting a child's ability to participate in social interactions ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref282">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib61" id="ref283">61</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-24">Discussion</hd> <p>By applying components of the ICF, 21 studies were analysed to explore SLP social communication interventions for autistic children and youth. No studies explicitly cited the ICF. All studies discussed participation and environmental factors as part of the intervention, and some discussed body structures and functions, personal factors and activities. Although we included search terms related to youth, none of the 21 studies focused on children or youth over the age of 12. We intended to capture interventions including children between the ages of 2 and 21 years, but some interventions included children as young as age 1 in addition to older children (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref284">50</reflink>] included ages 1–6 years). The examples extracted in our study should therefore be contextualized as relating to social communication interventions for younger children between the ages of 1 and 12 years. The examples detailed within each ICF domain may be helpful to SLPs looking to understand how different components of social communication interventions link to ICF categories. Our study results also illustrate the current landscape of social communication interventions and provide detailed examples of intervention components, organized according to the ICF. Below, we discuss key takeaways related to applying the ICF to social communication interventions and describe future directions associated with this work.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-25">Defining social communication terminology</hd> <p>We extracted whether each paper defined at least one of the social communication terms they used in the study; nine did not do so. Of the 11 studies that did provide at least one definition, terms were variable (e.g., social + interaction, behaviour, cognition, communication abilities, responses, initiations, cognitive performance, engagement). It is important for clinicians and researchers to define clearly the social communication-related domains they are targeting (e.g., social cognition, social skills, social relationships). A 2021 scoping review identified 293 sources that defined social communication in autism and found a lack of consensus in their definitions and an overall lack of clarity in the skills measured ([<reflink idref="bib84" id="ref285">84</reflink>]). Providing specific operational definitions is essential for transparency and rigour and helps readers make judgements about ecological validity. For example, there is evidence that social cognition, social skill and social motivation measures minimally predict social interaction outcomes for autistic adults ([<reflink idref="bib65" id="ref286">65</reflink>]) and that contextual factors such as the social abilities of neurotypical communication partners and the built environment can be more significant predictors of social outcomes ([<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref287">10</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref288">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref289">20</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib65" id="ref290">65</reflink>]). SLPs should thoughtfully consider how this evidence impacts the social communication components they choose to target in interventions and report on what specific social communication components they are targeting.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-26">How do SLP social communication interventions reflect the ICF domains?</hd> <p>Although ICF components were present in all studies extracted, none of the 21 studies explicitly discussed the ICF. This is consistent with underutilization of the ICF in other rehabilitation fields ([<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref291">8</reflink>]) and in the field of SLP ([<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref292">79</reflink>]). For example, [<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref293">79</reflink>] studied ICF uptake by SLP students and found that there were challenges understanding the ICF beyond a rudimentary level and limited opportunity to bridge academic learning about the ICF to practice ([<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref294">79</reflink>]). Our study's findings similarly reflect an underutilization of the ICF in SLP social communication interventions. Future research on the specific barriers and facilitators to ICF implementation for social communication interventions would be valuable to guide decision-making.</p> <p>Regarding how intervention content mapped onto ICF domains, participation was unsurprisingly the most common focus, as social communication requires another person with whom to engage and is inextricably linked to participation. Environmental factors, specifically the support and relationships subcategory, are also likely to be part of any social communication intervention, given the relational nature of social communication. Some papers discussed activities not related to participation, such as increasing knowledge of social communication concepts, rather than in the context of applying those activities in social contexts ([<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref295">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref296">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib89" id="ref297">89</reflink>]). Our results must be contextualized within our definitions of ICF domains, namely, to consider activity components in the absence of participation to differentiate the categories. However, all studies that discussed participation would include activity components as part of participation.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-27">What can be learned from the process of applying ICF concepts to SLP social communication int...</hd> <p>By assessing the presence or absence of ICF domains and reporting examples of how each ICF domain is reflected in SLP social communication interventions for autistic children and youth, we have provided a high-level overview and exploration of the literature. Our analysis demonstrates that the ICF can be used as a lens to analyse and report social communication interventions and provide a common language to discuss what the intervention aims to change, and the outcomes reported by authors, as has been done in other areas of SLP and rehabilitation ([<reflink idref="bib59" id="ref298">59</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib91" id="ref299">91</reflink>]). However, describing the presence or absence of specific ICF domains may not capture whether the intervention incorporates child and family perspectives or focuses on a child's strengths ([<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref300">13</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib46" id="ref301">46</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref302">93</reflink>]). In addition to exploring each domain, we must describe the interconnectedness among the ICF domains, including between contextual factors (i.e., personal factors, environmental factors) and functioning and disability factors (i.e., body structures and functions, activities, participation), as well as various permutations of combinations (e.g., connection between personal factors and environmental factors) to achieve holistic and generalizable interventions. There is some literature focusing on the bidirectional relationships between ICF domains and their real-world implications ([<reflink idref="bib76" id="ref303">76</reflink>]), including in the field of SLP ([<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref304">25</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib91" id="ref305">91</reflink>]).</p> <p>When mapping the interventions onto ICF domains, we found that similar intervention components could be categorized differently using the ICF depending on how authors reported their intervention. For example, the observed 'behaviour' of eye contact was coded as body structures and function when described as 'child looked into therapist's eyes for 2 seconds' ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref306">51</reflink>], p. 612), without any activity or participation context provided, but was coded as 'participation' when described as the purpose of making eye contact to gain the attention or show engagement with a communication partner ([<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref307">66</reflink>]). This example illustrates the importance of authors clearly describing their intervention components and the context in which they occur. In other words, the 'meaning' of an observed 'behaviour' requires context. It is possible that [<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref308">51</reflink>] also targeted eye contact within a participation context when carrying out their intervention, but this is not explicitly mentioned in their description. Personal and environmental factors should be reported to contextualize how attitudes, culture, support and relationships, and services, systems and policies inform functioning domains (i.e., body structures and functions, activities, participation) ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref309">93</reflink>]). Building upon the example of eye contact, personal and/or environmental factors related to eye contact were not discussed in any studies. Eye contact is described in the autism literature as highly dependent on who the autistic person is speaking to (environment) and can feel aversive for some autistic people (personal factors) ([<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref310">33</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib87" id="ref311">87</reflink>]). Interventions risk lacking vital context and causing harm if they fail to contextualize their interventions by describing relevant personal and environmental factors.</p> <p>Regarding participation, extracting data by summarizing examples of participation for all studies (e.g., making friends, having conversations with peers, playing a back-and-forth activity) provides a valuable overview of the literature, yet can miss the nuances of how participation interacts with personal and/or environmental factors. For example, the participation-focused goal of having conversations with peers was discussed by several studies ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref312">18</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref313">54</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref314">57</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib66" id="ref315">66</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib72" id="ref316">72</reflink>]). Conversation preferences and topics of interest (personal factors) often differ between autistic and neurotypical people ([<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref317">23</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref318">36</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib65" id="ref319">65</reflink>]) and within the heterogeneous group of autistic people ([<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref320">23</reflink>]). Incorporating personal factors would allow clinicians to consider whether having the autistic child apply neurotypical conversation norms (e.g., taking turns, small talk, nonverbal communication) aligns with that child's preferences for socializing.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-28">Limitations and future directions</hd> <p>The authorship team did not include autistic researchers or people with lived and living experience; their inclusion might have yielded different research questions or perspectives in data analysis. Our analysis was also limited by the detail provided by the original authors on their interventions, which varied across studies. We acknowledge that how authors reported on their interventions may differ from how they were carried out. We did not complete quality appraisal or risk of bias assessment for the studies extracted as this is an optional component of scoping reviews, and our primary objective was to explore applications of the ICF to SLP social communication literature without a specific focus on the quality of the interventions analysed. However, appraisal of the studies and assessment of bias could be a valuable future direction for researchers interested in this information on the SLP social communication interventions.</p> <p>In addition, none of the studies included participants older than 12 years of age. Our results therefore reflect SLP social communication interventions for younger children, rather than youth. There are several reasons why youth may not be represented. First, many popular social communication interventions for autistic youth are not specifically SLP social communication interventions (e.g., PEERS; [<reflink idref="bib49" id="ref321">49</reflink>]) and therefore would not have fit our inclusion/exclusion criteria of SLP involvement in the intervention. Second, autism research primarily focuses on younger children and 'early intervention', and youth may be studied less often ([<reflink idref="bib42" id="ref322">42</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib58" id="ref323">58</reflink>]). Social communication interventions from other disciplines were outside of the scope of this review, which focused on the SLP literature. However, future research may wish to examine social communication interventions for autistic children and youth broadly, as evidence from other fields may be of interest to speech-language pathologists, particularly for youth. Another future direction could be to use the ICF as a lens to study social communication interventions in specific fields such as occupational therapy, behaviour therapy, psychology, or education, to reflect on how various professions conceptualize social communication interventions using the ICF as a lens.</p> <p>A future direction for our authorship team is to apply the findings from this article to analyse SLP social communication interventions with additional detail, including whether interventions are strengths- or deficit-based, and whether there is child or family involvement in intervention goals or outcome measurement. These explorations would provide valuable information on SLP social communication interventions but are outside of the scope of this article, which focuses on how the ICF can be used as a lens to analyse social communication interventions. Although the ICF is considered a strength-based and holistic framework, the ICF ([<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref324">93</reflink>]) does not include a formal way to describe whether the information provided in the ICF domains is strength-based or deficit-based. To capture the strength-based element of the ICF for children and youth, clinicians and researchers may consider using language from the F-Words for Childhood Development ([<reflink idref="bib75" id="ref325">75</reflink>]), a paediatric 'animation' of the ICF that uses strength-based language such as functioning, friends and fun, among other terms, and is written from the child's perspective.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-29">Putting it all together: illustrating how ICF concepts could be considered in an intervention</hd> <p>In our discussion, we have described how SLP social communication interventions can be analysed through the lens of the ICF, and have outlined various considerations for applying the ICF in a manner that considers contextual factors. In the following, we have created a fictional example of how an SLP social communication intervention can apply the ICF:</p> <p></p> <ulist> <item> A fictional SLP social communication intervention, 'Connections', aims to increase the amount of time spent socializing on the playground, and does so by measuring the length of time that 7- to 9-year-old autistic children spend in social interactions with peers at a playground. The intervention uses the outcome measures of parents reporting how long their child spends interacting with peers at the playground, children reporting on their own playground participation and a therapist watching videos of the children at the playground and coding them for pre- and post-intervention observations.</item> </ulist> <p>The ICF could serve as a valuable framework for researchers and clinicians to consider the intervention structure, aims and outcomes. The researchers decide to use the ICF in conjunction with another intervention planning framework, the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) ([<reflink idref="bib90" id="ref326">90</reflink>]), to outline clearly their intervention aims and key ingredients ([<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref327">34</reflink>]). For example, the researchers identify that their intervention primarily targets child participation, but after looking at the ICF, they also wonder if their intervention targets environmental factor changes, specifically support from parents to facilitate interactions at the playground, or attitude changes in parents to understand the different ways that autistic children may enjoy playing ([<reflink idref="bib71" id="ref328">71</reflink>]). The researchers ask themselves how their intervention will consider personal factors and environmental factors: How will they obtain information about the children's baseline communication preferences and skills? What aspects of the parents' or children's attitudes on playing with peers do they plan to change? How will they capture the culture of each family and how their values may influence intervention uptake? How will they describe if intervention strategies were individualized to each child and family's strengths, preferences and goals? These questions are merely a few examples to illustrate how applying the ICF to guide our thinking can lead researchers and clinicians alike to develop social communication interventions thoughtfully. Figure 3 shows an illustration of these reflections, which can be used as a visual to prompt SLP researchers and clinicians to consider how contextual factors and functioning and disability factors interact.</p> <p>Graph: Figure 3. ICF functioning and disability factors and contextual factors. Notes. Figure created based upon the [<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref329">93</reflink>] ICF, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The ICF contextual factors and functioning and disability factors interact, indicated by bidirectional arrows between the two categories. The purple section in the middle provides several examples of reflection questions that incorporate multiple ICF domains. These examples are nonexhaustive and aim to prompt further reflection from readers, written from the perspective of a child.</p> <hd id="AN0192433622-30">Conclusions and clinical implications</hd> <p>SLPs delivering social communication interventions may find our application of the ICF helpful to evaluate and reflect upon their intervention practices, including how the ICF framework may be a valuable lens through which to view their therapy practices. Figure 3 and the associated case study provide an example of how the ICF can be applied to a fictional SLP social communication intervention. This article provides a high-level overview of the ICF domains that are commonly present or absent in SLP social communication interventions and examples of each domain. This review adds to the body of literature applying the ICF to SLP practice, working towards holistic, strengths-based interventions that consider the impact of personal and environmental factors on functioning, disability and health. When applying the ICF, clinicians and researchers must be clear about what aspects of social communication their intervention targets and ensure that relevant terminology is defined. The ICF's personal and environmental factors domains can create a space for clinicians and researchers to reflect upon the alignment between intervention goals and the contextual factors (e.g., cultural norms, communication preferences) that are relevant to the autistic child and their family.</p> <p>We gratefully acknowledge Dr Vanessa Tomas, who provided guidance on this manuscript as the course instructor for McMaster University's ICF Theory and Use course ([<reflink idref="bib69" id="ref330">69</reflink>]). We also gratefully acknowledge Laura Banfield, McMaster University Librarian, for her guidance on our search terms and databases, Minseo (Sunny) Kim (M.K.) for her contributions to screening articles for this review, and Mona Elmikaty (M.E.) for her support as a second coder for our data extraction.</p> <ref id="AN0192433622-31"> <title> Footnotes </title> <blist> <bibl id="bib1" idref="ref3" type="bt">1</bibl> <bibtext> Maya Albin</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext>Graph https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-4048</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib2" idref="ref4" type="bt">2</bibl> <bibtext> Maya Albin: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Methodology; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.Michelle Phoenix: Conceptualization; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.Peter Rosenbaum: Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib3" idref="ref5" type="bt">3</bibl> <bibtext> The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: M.A. is funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Award (CGS-D).</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib4" idref="ref6" type="bt">4</bibl> <bibtext> The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib5" idref="ref7" type="bt">5</bibl> <bibtext> The authors confirm that the study data are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials. See Table 1 and Figshare documents uploaded for inclusion/exclusion criteria, the search strategy and an Excel spreadsheet of our extracted data.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib6" idref="ref23" type="bt">6</bibl> <bibtext> This is a scoping review in which we analysed the published literature, and therefore, no data were collected directly from individuals or families. We therefore have no recruitment or sampling information to report. We have included some demographic characteristics (e.g., age) but did not include gender, race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, given they were not part of our research question.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib7" idref="ref73" type="bt">7</bibl> <bibtext> Supplemental material for this article is available at https://figshare.com/s/aa0d3bffe0d9dc8da010.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib8" idref="ref15" type="bt">8</bibl> <bibtext> Identity-first language is used throughout this article, as this terminology is preferred by many in the autistic community, as many feel it reflects autism as 'inseparable from and fundamental to an individual's experience of the world' ([16], p. 21; [83]).</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib9" idref="ref30" type="bt">9</bibl> <bibtext> Current affiliation: Maya Albin and Michelle Phoenix are now affiliated with CanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, Canada. Peter Rosenbaum is now affiliated with Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <ref id="AN0192433622-32"> <title> References </title> <blist> <bibtext> *Adams C., Gaile J., Roddam H., Baxendale J., Clitheroe L., Emsley R. (2020). Evaluation of a manualised speech and language therapy programme for children with social communication disorder: The SCIP feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6, 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00658-2</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Albin M., Chawrun I., Tint A. (2024). Rethinking social communication support: Exploring communication partner training for autistic adults and their neurotypical communication partners. Autism in Adulthood, 7(5), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0181</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> ASHA (n.d.-a). Components of social communication. ASHA Clinical Topics. https://<ulink href="http://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/social-communication-disorder/components-of-social-communication/">www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/social-communication-disorder/components-of-social-communication/</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> ASHA (n.d.-b). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). ASHA SLP. https://<ulink href="http://www.asha.org/slp/icf/">www.asha.org/slp/icf/</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> AltogetherAutism. (2019). Strengths and abilities in autism. https://<ulink href="http://www.altogetherautism.org.nz/strengths-and-abilities-in-autism/">www.altogetherautism.org.nz/strengths-and-abilities-in-autism/</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. (DSM-5). Pilgrim Press.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Arksey H., O'Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Barradell S., Scholten I. (2024). How, and to what end, is the WHO-ICF framework represented in physiotherapy? Insights from a qualitative research synthesis. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 41, 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2370345</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Binns A. V., Oram Cardy J. (2019). Developmental social pragmatic interventions for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518824497</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Black M. H., McGarry S., Churchill L., D'Arcy E., Dalgleish J., Nash I...Girdler S. (2022). Considerations of the built environment for autistic individuals: A review of the literature. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 26(8), 1904–1915. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221102753</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Blake H., McLeod S. (2018). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Considering individuals from a perspective of health and wellness. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(17), 69–77.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bölte S., de Schipper E., Robison J. E., Wong V. C., Selb M., Singhal N...Zwaigenbaum L. (2014). Classification of functioning and impairment: The development of ICF core sets for autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research: Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 7(1), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1335</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bölte S., Lawson W. B., Marschik P. B., Girdler S. (2021). Reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable: The WHO's ICF system integrates biological and psychosocial environmental determinants of autism and ADHD. Bioessays, 43(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202000254</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bölte S., Mahdi S., de Vries P. J., Granlund M., Robison J. E., Shulman C...Selb M. (2018). The Gestalt of functioning in autism spectrum disorder: Results of the international conference to develop final consensus International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core sets. Autism, 23(2), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318755522</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bottema-Beutel K. (2024). Putting autism research in social contexts. Autism, 28(7), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241245642</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bottema-Beutel K., Kapp S. K., Lester J. N., Sasson N. J., Hand B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0014</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Bruno G., Lindblom A., Tupou J., Kewene F., Waisman T., Magiati I. (2025). Decolonizing autism research: Integrating Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing. Autism, 29(11), 2637–2643. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251382398</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Casenhiser D. M., Shanker S. G., Stieben J. (2013). Learning through interaction in children with autism: Preliminary data from asocial-communication-based intervention. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 17(2), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361311422052</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cheeseman D., Madden R., Bundy A. (2013). Your ideas about participation and environment: A new self-report instrument. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(22), 1903–1908. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.767385</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Chen Y.-L., Schneider M., Patten K. (2022). Exploring interpersonal and environmental factors of autistic adolescents' peer engagement in integrated education. Autism, 26(5), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211046158</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104(Originalworkpublished1960)</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Covidence systematic review software. (n.d.). Veritas Health Innovation. <ulink href="http://www.covidence.org">www.covidence.org</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Crompton C. J., Ropar D., Evans-Williams C. V., Flynn E. G., Fletcher-Watson S. (2020). Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 24(7), 1704–1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320919286</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cummins C., Pellicano E., Crane L. (2020). Autistic adults' views of their communication skills and needs. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12552</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Dempsey L., Skarakis-Doyle E. (2010). Developmental language impairment through the lens of the ICF: An integrated account of children's functioning. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(5), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.004</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Di Rezze B., Rosenbaum P. (2016). Developing a classification system of social communication functioning of preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 58(9), 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13152</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Figshare. (2024). Figshare data with private de-identified links including: Search terms (https://figshare.com/s/6e008854dd4277bf1267?file=49872516); Inclusion and exclusion criteria (https://figshare.com/s/8e016c56bbcbe41065f7?file=49872489), and raw data extraction chart (https://figshare.com/s/aa0d3bffe0d9dc8da010).</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Franco J. H., Davis B. L., Davis J. L. (2013). Increasing social interaction using prelinguistic milieu teaching with nonverbal school-age children with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3). 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/10-0103)</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Fuller E. A., Kaiser A. P. (2020). The effects of early intervention on social communication outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(5), 1683–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03927-z</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gaddy C., Crow H. (2023). A primer on neurodiversity-affirming speech and language services for autistic individuals. ASHA Perspectives Sig 1 Language Learning and Education, 8, 1220–1237. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-23-00106</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Girolametto L., Sussman F., Weitzman E. (2007). Using case study methods to investigate the effects of interactive intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(6), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.11.001</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Godoy P. B. G., McWilliams L., Rodrigues da, Silveira L., de Cesaro Revers Biasão M., Speggiorin Pereira Alarcão F., Seda L...Shephard E. (2024). Acceptability and feasibility of a parent-mediated social-communication therapy for young autistic children in Brazil: A qualitative implementation study of Paediatric Autism Communication Therapy. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 28(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221144501</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hadjikhani N., Åsberg Johnels J., Zürcher N. R., Lassalle A., Guillon Q., Hippolyte L...Gillberg C. (2017). Look me in the eyes: Constraining gaze in the eye-region provokes abnormally high subcortical activation in autism. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 3163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03378-5</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hamilton J., Sohlberg M. M., Turkstra L. (2024). Opening the black box of cognitive rehabilitation: Integrating the ICF, RTSS, and PIE. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(2), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12774</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hammell K. (2015). Rethinking rehabilitation's assumptions: Challenging 'thinking-as-usual' and envisioning a relevant future. In Rethinking rehabilitation (pp. 45–68). https://doi.org/10.1201/b18118-5</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Heasman B., Gillespie A. (2019). Neurodivergent intersubjectivity: Distinctive features of how autistic people create shared understanding. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 23(4), 910–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318785172</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Howe T. J. (2008). The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1–2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701774824</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hsieh M., Lynch G., Madison C. (2018). Intervention techniques used with autism spectrum disorder by speech-language pathologists in the United States and Taiwan: A descriptive analysis of practice in clinical settings. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1091–1104. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0039</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Hutchins T. L., Prelock P. A. (2006). Using social stories and comic strip conversations to promote socially valid outcomes for children with autism. Seminars in Speech and Language, 27(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-932438</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Hutchins T. L., Prelock P. A. (2013). The social validity of social stories TM for supporting the behavioural and communicative functioning of children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.743174</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Ineese-Nash N. (2020). Disability as a colonial construct: The missing discourse of culture in conceptualizations of disabled indigenous children. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(3), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v9i3.645</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Jang J., Matson J. L., Adams H. L., Konst M. J., Cervantes P. E., Goldin R. L. (2014). What are the ages of persons studied in autism research: A 20-year review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(12), 1756–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.08.008</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Jethava V., Kadish J., Kakonge L., Wiseman-Hakes C. (2022). Early attachment and the development of social communication: A neuropsychological approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 838950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.838950</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kapp S. (2019). How social deficit models exacerbate the medical model: Autism as case in point. Autism Policy & Practice, 2(1), 3–28.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kapp S. (2020). Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement: Stories from the frontline. Springer Nature.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Karhula M., Saukkonen S., Xiong E., Kinnunen A., Heiskanen T., Anttila H. (2021). ICF personal factors strengthen commitment to person-centered rehabilitation–a scoping review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2, Article 709682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.709682</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Katz E., Girolametto L. (2013). Peer-mediated intervention for preschoolers with ASD implemented in early childhood education settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121413484972</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Keegan L. C., Hoepner J. K., Togher L., Kennedy M. (2023). Clinically applicable sociolinguistic assessment for cognitive-communication disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(2S), 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00102</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Laugeson E. A., Frankel F., Gantman A., Dillon A. R., Mogil C. (2012). Evidence-based social skills training for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: The UCLA PEERS program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1339-1</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Lerna A., Esposito D., Conson M., Massagli A. (2014). Long-term effects of PECS on social-communicative skills of children with autism spectrum disorders: A follow-up study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(4), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12079</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Lerna A., Esposito D., Conson M., Russo L., Massagli A. (2012). Social-communicative effects of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) in autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(5), 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00172.x</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Levac D., Colquhoun H., O'Brien K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Lilley R., Sedgwick M., Pellicano E. (2019). 'We look after our own mob': Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander experiences of autism. Macquarie University. https://research-management.mq.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/114274862/114273488.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Lim S. M., Kattapuram A., Lian W. B. (2007). Evaluation of a pilot clinic-based social skills group. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260707000109</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Lundälv J., Törnbom M., Larsson P. O., Sunnerhagen K. S. (2015). Awareness and the arguments for and against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health among representatives of disability organisations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 3293–3300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120303293</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Ma E. P. M., Threats T. T., Worrall L. E. (2008). An introduction to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for speech-language pathology: Its past, present and future. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1–2), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701772612</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *MacEvilly D., Maguire K., Brosnan G., Gaffney L. (2024). Enhancing children's emotional regulation and social communication through group intervention – evidence of impact in an Irish outpatient child and adolescent mental health Service. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 40(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/02656590241228424</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Maksimović S., Marisavljević M., Stanojević N., Ćirović M., Punišić S., Adamović T...Subotić M. (2023). Importance of early intervention in reducing autistic symptoms and speech-language deficits in children with autism spectrum disorder. Children (Basel), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010122</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> McLeod S. (2009). Speech pathologists' application of the ICF to children with speech impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 6(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040410001669516</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> McMaster University. (n.d.). Graduate studies: Speech-language pathology. https://gs.mcmaster.ca/program/speech-language-pathology/</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Miletic K., Servais M., Cardy J. O., Denusik L. (2024). Do caregiver perceptions of the virtual More Than Words® program differ based on autistic children's attributes? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(3), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00278</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Milton D. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The 'double empathy problem '. Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Mohammadzaheri F., Koegel L. K., Bakhshi E., Khosrowabadi R., Soleymani Z. (2022). The effect of teaching initiations on the communication of children with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(6), 2598–2609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05153-y</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Morrison K., DeBrabander K., Jones D., Ackerman R., Sasson N. (2020). Social cognition, social skill, and social motivation minimally predict social interaction outcomes for autistic and non-autistic adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591100</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Müller E., Cannon L. R., Kornblum C., Clark J., Powers M. (2016). Description and preliminary evaluation of a curriculum for teaching conversational skills to children with high-functioning autism and other social cognition challenges. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0042</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Nair V. K., Farah W., Boveda M. (2024). Is neurodiversity a Global Northern Whit paradigm? Autism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241280835</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Napoli S. B., Vitale M. P., Cafiero P. J., Micheletti M. B., Bradichansky P. P., Lejarraga C...Schiariti V. (2021). Developing a culturally sensitive ICF-based tool to describe functioning of children with autism spectrum disorder: TEA-CIFunciona version 1.0 pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073720</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Nguyen T., Fayed N., Gorter J. W., MacDermid J. (2016). Enhancing interprofessional education and practice: Development and implementation of a new graduate-level course using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(3), 385–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2016.1139557</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> O'Halloran R., Larkins B. (2008). The ICF activities and participation related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701772620</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> O'Keeffe C., McNally S. (2025). 'Like it's making my heart run': A strengths-based understanding of the play of autistic children. Autism, 29, 1469–1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251315985</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Pereira T., Ramalho A. M., Valente A. R. S., Couto P. S., Lousada M. (2022). The effects of the pragmatic intervention programme in children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental language disorder. Brain Sciences, 12(12), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121640</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Peters M. D. J., Marnie C., Tricco A. C., Pollock D., Munn Z., Alexander L... Khalil H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Pollock D., Peters M. D. J., Khalil H., McInerney P., Alexander L., Tricco A. C... Munn Z. (2023). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Rosenbaum P., Gorter J. W. (2012). The 'F-words' in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think!. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(4), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01338.x</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Rouquette A., Badley E. M., Falissard B., Dub T., Leplege A., Coste J. (2015). Moderators, mediators, and bidirectional relationships in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework: An empirical investigation using a longitudinal design and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Social Science & Medicine, 1982(1982), 135133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.007</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Salt J., Sellars V., Shemilt J., Boyd S., Coulson T., McCool S. (2001). The Scottish Centre for Autism Preschool Treatment Programme. I: A developmental approach to early intervention. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 5(4), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361301005004003</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Schiariti V., Mahdi S., Bölte S. (2018). International classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, and attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 60(9), 933–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13922</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Scholten I., Ross K., Bickford J. (2019). 'A way to think of the client holistically': Factors influencing speech-language pathology students' ICF regard and uptake. MedEdPublish (2016), 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2019.000061.2</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Shire S. Y., Chang Y. C., Shih W., Bracaglia S., Kodjoe M., Kasari C. (2017). Hybrid implementation model of community-partnered early intervention for toddlers with autism: A randomized trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 58(5), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12672</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Speech-Language and Audiology Canada (SAC). (2010). Position statement on outcome measures [SAC Position Statements]. https://<ulink href="http://www.sac-oac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/outcomes%5fmeasures%5fposition%5fstatement%5fenglish.pdf">www.sac-oac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/outcomes%5fmeasures%5fposition%5fstatement%5fenglish.pdf</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Sun I. Y. I., Varanda C. A., Fernandes F. D. (2017). Stimulation of executive functions as part of the language intervention process in children with autism spectrum disorder. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica: Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 69, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479586</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Taboas A., Doepke K., Zimmerman C. (2023). Preferences for identity-first versus person-first language in a US sample of autism stakeholders. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 27(2), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221130845</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Tajik-Parvinchi D., Hidecker M. J. C., Selvakumaran S., Fan L., Batth S., Fang H...DiRezze B. (2021). Operationalizing social communication in autism and related neurodevelopmental research: A scoping review over 20 years. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 8(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-021-00224-2</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Threats T. T. (2010). The ICF and speech-language pathology: Aspiring to a fuller realization of ethical and moral issues. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549500903568476</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Tola G., Talu V., Congiu T., Bain P., Lindert J. (2021). Built environment design and people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063203</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Trevisan D. A., Roberts N., Lin C., Birmingham E. (2017). How do adults and teens with self-declared Autism Spectrum Disorder experience eye contact? A qualitative analysis of first-hand accounts. PLOS ONE, 12(11), Article e0188446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188446</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Tricco A. C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O'Brien K. K., Colquhoun H., Levac D...Straus S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *van der Meer L., Sigafoos J., Sutherland D., McLay L., Lang R., Lancioni G. E... Marschik P. B. (2014). Preference-enhanced communication intervention and development of social communicative functions in a child with autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Case Studies, 13(3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650113508221</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Van Stan J. H., Dijkers M. P., Whyte J., Hart T., Turkstra L. S., Zanca J. M., Chen C. (2019). The rehabilitation treatment specification system: Implications for improvements in research design, reporting, replication, and synthesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.112</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Westby C., Washington K. N. (2017). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in assessment and intervention of school-aged children with language impairments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0037</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> *Williams T. I., Loucas T., Sin J., Jeremic M., Meyer S., Boseley S...Liu F. (2024). Using music to assist language learning in autistic children with minimal verbal language: The MAP feasibility RCT. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 28(10), 2515–2533. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241233804</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health (ICF). Geneva.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <aug> <p>By Maya Albin; Michelle Phoenix and Peter Rosenbaum</p> <p>Reported by Author; Author; Author</p> </aug> <nolink nlid="nl1" bibid="bib93" firstref="ref1"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl2" bibid="bib12" firstref="ref11"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl3" bibid="bib13" firstref="ref12"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl4" bibid="bib78" firstref="ref13"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl5" bibid="bib14" firstref="ref14"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl6" bibid="bib26" firstref="ref16"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl7" bibid="bib68" firstref="ref17"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl8" bibid="bib19" firstref="ref18"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl9" bibid="bib24" firstref="ref21"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl10" bibid="bib29" firstref="ref22"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl11" bibid="bib44" firstref="ref24"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl12" bibid="bib45" firstref="ref25"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl13" bibid="bib38" firstref="ref26"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl14" bibid="bib91" firstref="ref27"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl15" bibid="bib62" firstref="ref28"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl16" bibid="bib36" firstref="ref29"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl17" bibid="bib23" firstref="ref31"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl18" bibid="bib15" firstref="ref33"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl19" bibid="bib20" firstref="ref34"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl20" bibid="bib65" firstref="ref35"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl21" bibid="bib10" firstref="ref37"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl22" bibid="bib86" firstref="ref40"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl23" bibid="bib67" firstref="ref42"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl24" bibid="bib17" firstref="ref44"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl25" bibid="bib41" firstref="ref45"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl26" bibid="bib53" firstref="ref46"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl27" bibid="bib55" firstref="ref50"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl28" bibid="bib35" firstref="ref51"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl29" bibid="bib11" firstref="ref53"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl30" bibid="bib56" firstref="ref54"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl31" bibid="bib59" firstref="ref55"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl32" bibid="bib79" firstref="ref56"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl33" bibid="bib85" firstref="ref57"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl34" bibid="bib70" firstref="ref59"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl35" bibid="bib37" firstref="ref60"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl36" bibid="bib81" firstref="ref63"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl37" bibid="bib60" firstref="ref65"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl38" bibid="bib43" firstref="ref66"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl39" bibid="bib48" firstref="ref67"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl40" bibid="bib30" firstref="ref71"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl41" bibid="bib52" firstref="ref74"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl42" bibid="bib88" firstref="ref77"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl43" bibid="bib27" firstref="ref78"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl44" bibid="bib22" firstref="ref80"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl45" bibid="bib74" firstref="ref82"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl46" bibid="bib73" firstref="ref83"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl47" bibid="bib21" firstref="ref93"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl48" bibid="bib64" firstref="ref94"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl49" bibid="bib18" firstref="ref95"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl50" bibid="bib80" firstref="ref96"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl51" bibid="bib92" firstref="ref97"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl52" bibid="bib72" firstref="ref98"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl53" bibid="bib28" firstref="ref99"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl54" bibid="bib31" firstref="ref100"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl55" bibid="bib40" firstref="ref101"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl56" bibid="bib39" firstref="ref102"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl57" bibid="bib47" firstref="ref103"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl58" bibid="bib89" firstref="ref104"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl59" bibid="bib51" firstref="ref105"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl60" bibid="bib50" firstref="ref106"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl61" bibid="bib63" firstref="ref107"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl62" bibid="bib54" firstref="ref108"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl63" bibid="bib66" firstref="ref109"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl64" bibid="bib61" firstref="ref110"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl65" bibid="bib82" firstref="ref112"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl66" bibid="bib77" firstref="ref113"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl67" bibid="bib57" firstref="ref114"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl68" bibid="bib32" firstref="ref115"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl69" bibid="bib84" firstref="ref285"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl70" bibid="bib46" firstref="ref301"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl71" bibid="bib76" firstref="ref303"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl72" bibid="bib25" firstref="ref304"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl73" bibid="bib33" firstref="ref310"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl74" bibid="bib87" firstref="ref311"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl75" bibid="bib49" firstref="ref321"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl76" bibid="bib42" firstref="ref322"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl77" bibid="bib58" firstref="ref323"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl78" bibid="bib75" firstref="ref325"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl79" bibid="bib90" firstref="ref326"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl80" bibid="bib34" firstref="ref327"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl81" bibid="bib71" firstref="ref328"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl82" bibid="bib69" firstref="ref330"></nolink>
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1500984
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Speech-Language Pathology Social Communication Interventions for Autistic Children and Youth: A Scoping Review
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maya+Albin%22">Maya Albin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-4048">0000-0002-3689-4048</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michelle+Phoenix%22">Michelle Phoenix</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peter+Rosenbaum%22">Peter Rosenbaum</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Autism%3A+The+International+Journal+of+Research+and+Practice%22"><i>Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice</i></searchLink>. 2026 30(4):847-865.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+Organizations%22">International Organizations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Global+Approach%22">Global Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Health%22">Public Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Autism+Spectrum+Disorders%22">Autism Spectrum Disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Youth%22">Youth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+Communication%22">Interpersonal Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+Relationship%22">Interpersonal Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health%22">Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disabilities%22">Disabilities</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/13623613251390609
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1362-3613<br />1461-7005
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm in viewing autistic people's social communication holistically and in a strength-based manner. In this scoping review, we explored how social communication interventions for autistic children and youth map onto the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the field of speech-language pathology. OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Population, intervention and study data were extracted, as well as data on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains related to the social communication interventions. In total, 21 articles were included in our analysis. No studies explicitly mentioned the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. All the studies focused on participation and environmental factors (e.g., people's attitudes, physical environment), and some studies discussed other International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains such as body structures and functions, personal factors and activities. The examples provided for each International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domain may be helpful for clinicians and researchers looking to understand how components of social communication interventions link to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories. Future work could analyse how social communication interventions in other fields (e.g., psychology, occupational therapy) map onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1500984
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1500984
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/13623613251390609
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 847
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: International Organizations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Global Approach
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Autism Spectrum Disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Youth
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disabilities
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Speech-Language Pathology Social Communication Interventions for Autistic Children and Youth: A Scoping Review
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maya Albin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Michelle Phoenix
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peter Rosenbaum
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1362-3613
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1461-7005
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1