Building Bridges or Holy Huddles? Student Religious Organizations in British Universities
Saved in:
| Title: | Building Bridges or Holy Huddles? Student Religious Organizations in British Universities |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kristin Aune (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2025 18(5):726-739. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Universities, College Students, Student Organizations, Religious Organizations, Social Capital, Sense of Belonging, Friendship, Sense of Community, Social Life, Student Volunteers, Social Justice, Intergroup Relations |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom (Great Britain) |
| DOI: | 10.1037/dhe0000595 |
| ISSN: | 1938-8926 1938-8934 |
| Abstract: | Religion is increasingly being understood as an equality and diversity issue in universities, and religious students are central to debates in U.K. universities about freedom of speech and extremism. Yet, there is little qualitative or U.K.-based research on the primary institutional expression of student religiosity, student religious organizations. This study fills the gap. It explores what these organizations do, whether they are public- or private-facing, and what role they play in students' lives. It uses theories of social capital and thematic analysis to analyze data from semistructured interviews with 68 students in six U.K. universities. The article explores tensions between the organizations' focus on building community among members and on building bridges to people outside. It argues that student religious organizations are primarily sources of bonding (intracommunity) social capital; they play important roles in helping students feel at home on campus, creating friendships and strengthening religious identity, especially for minoritized students. To a lesser extent, the societies are also sources of bridging social capital (creating relationships with people outside the group), through volunteering and interfaith work. We argue that faith-sharing can also be considered a form of bridging as much as bonding social capital, challenging previous interpretations which see proselytism primarily as strengthening relationships within the group. The findings highlight the contribution of these organizations and the need for universities to be concerned with their flourishing. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1504560 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Religion is increasingly being understood as an equality and diversity issue in universities, and religious students are central to debates in U.K. universities about freedom of speech and extremism. Yet, there is little qualitative or U.K.-based research on the primary institutional expression of student religiosity, student religious organizations. This study fills the gap. It explores what these organizations do, whether they are public- or private-facing, and what role they play in students' lives. It uses theories of social capital and thematic analysis to analyze data from semistructured interviews with 68 students in six U.K. universities. The article explores tensions between the organizations' focus on building community among members and on building bridges to people outside. It argues that student religious organizations are primarily sources of bonding (intracommunity) social capital; they play important roles in helping students feel at home on campus, creating friendships and strengthening religious identity, especially for minoritized students. To a lesser extent, the societies are also sources of bridging social capital (creating relationships with people outside the group), through volunteering and interfaith work. We argue that faith-sharing can also be considered a form of bridging as much as bonding social capital, challenging previous interpretations which see proselytism primarily as strengthening relationships within the group. The findings highlight the contribution of these organizations and the need for universities to be concerned with their flourishing. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1938-8926 1938-8934 |
| DOI: | 10.1037/dhe0000595 |
