Adverse Childhood Experiences in Families with Intellectual Disabilities under Family Supervision Orders: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Adverse Childhood Experiences in Families with Intellectual Disabilities under Family Supervision Orders: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
Language: English
Authors: Jessica Vervoort-Schel (ORCID 0000-0001-9329-1617), Gabriëlle Mercera (ORCID 0000-0001-6851-4380), Inge Wissink (ORCID 0000-0002-4026-6618), Tessel Sterenborg (ORCID 0000-0003-3193-8803), Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen (ORCID 0000-0002-3644-3829), Peer van der Helm (ORCID 0000-0001-5425-8478), Ramón Lindauer (ORCID 0000-0002-0387-1309), Xavier Moonen (ORCID 0000-0002-1336-9152)
Source: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 2026 51(1):51-62.
Availability: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Early Experience, Intellectual Disability, Family (Sociological Unit), Foreign Countries, Children, Context Effect, Family Characteristics
Geographic Terms: Netherlands
DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663
ISSN: 1366-8250
1469-9532
Abstract: Background: Families with intellectual disabilities are overrepresented in child protection systems. However, little is known about how adverse experiences co-occur in this population. This study examined the prevalence and interrelations of original and extended adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and contextual child and family variables in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders (FSOs). Method: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of 128 Dutch case files concerning children aged 0-17 under an FSO, using structured codebooks. Results: Children were exposed to M = 4.4 original ACEs (SD = 2.0); 66.4% experienced four or more. Extended ACEs (e.g., out-of-home placement) and family risk factors (e.g., parental mental health problems, limited social support) were common. Several significant interrelations emerged across child, parent, and resource domains. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to address co-occurring adversities across family contexts when developing ACE-informed strategies in child protection settings.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1505282
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Background: Families with intellectual disabilities are overrepresented in child protection systems. However, little is known about how adverse experiences co-occur in this population. This study examined the prevalence and interrelations of original and extended adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and contextual child and family variables in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders (FSOs). Method: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of 128 Dutch case files concerning children aged 0-17 under an FSO, using structured codebooks. Results: Children were exposed to M = 4.4 original ACEs (SD = 2.0); 66.4% experienced four or more. Extended ACEs (e.g., out-of-home placement) and family risk factors (e.g., parental mental health problems, limited social support) were common. Several significant interrelations emerged across child, parent, and resource domains. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to address co-occurring adversities across family contexts when developing ACE-informed strategies in child protection settings.
ISSN:1366-8250
1469-9532
DOI:10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663