Differential Effects of a Literacy Intervention across Academic Cycles in Children with Learning Difficulties

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Differential Effects of a Literacy Intervention across Academic Cycles in Children with Learning Difficulties
Language: English
Authors: María Carmona (ORCID 0009-0007-3981-6567), Sara Mata (ORCID 0000-0002-4648-013X), Macarena De los Santos-Roig (ORCID 0000-0003-0566-743X), Francisca Serrano (ORCID 0000-0001-9000-6892)
Source: Journal of Research in Reading. 2026 49(2).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Descriptors: Learning Problems, Intervention, Literacy, Reading Skills, Skill Development, Reading Improvement, Elementary School Students, Foreign Countries, Phonology, Orthographic Symbols, Suprasegmentals, Reading Achievement, Achievement Gains, Reading Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Multiple Literacies
Geographic Terms: Spain
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.70025
ISSN: 0141-0423
1467-9817
Abstract: Background: This study explored the differential effects of a comprehensive intervention program for improving literacy skills in monolingual children with learning difficulties (LD) from Spain, enrolled in the second (Grades 3 and 4; aged 8-10 years) and third cycles (Grades 5 and 6; aged 10-12 years) of primary school. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre--post intervention design with three groups (intervention [LD-i], waiting-control [LD-w] and typical development [TD]) was used. A total of 34 second-cycle and 9 third-cycle children received 16 individualized sessions of explicit, systematic, and intensive training in reading, decoding, phonological, orthographic, prosodic, and morphological skills, at the sublexical and lexical levels. Evidence-based practices such as repeated practice and game-based techniques were applied, considering multisensory and cognitive approaches. The LD-i group was compared with the LD-w group (38 second-cycle and 20 third-cycle children) and with the TD group (31 second-cycle and 25 third-cycle children), who received regular school instruction. Results: Differential effects across cycles were observed after the intervention: second-cycle children in the LD-i group outperformed the LD-w group in phonological, orthographic and prosodic skills, reducing performance gaps with the TD group. Third-cycle students did not show statistical differences when compared with their LD-w peers. At the same time, both cycles showed similar gains after receiving the intervention, except for a word dictation task where second-cycle children improved more. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive, early, age-sensitive, and balanced literacy instruction to address LD, especially when older children experience persistent difficulties.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1506799
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Background: This study explored the differential effects of a comprehensive intervention program for improving literacy skills in monolingual children with learning difficulties (LD) from Spain, enrolled in the second (Grades 3 and 4; aged 8-10 years) and third cycles (Grades 5 and 6; aged 10-12 years) of primary school. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre--post intervention design with three groups (intervention [LD-i], waiting-control [LD-w] and typical development [TD]) was used. A total of 34 second-cycle and 9 third-cycle children received 16 individualized sessions of explicit, systematic, and intensive training in reading, decoding, phonological, orthographic, prosodic, and morphological skills, at the sublexical and lexical levels. Evidence-based practices such as repeated practice and game-based techniques were applied, considering multisensory and cognitive approaches. The LD-i group was compared with the LD-w group (38 second-cycle and 20 third-cycle children) and with the TD group (31 second-cycle and 25 third-cycle children), who received regular school instruction. Results: Differential effects across cycles were observed after the intervention: second-cycle children in the LD-i group outperformed the LD-w group in phonological, orthographic and prosodic skills, reducing performance gaps with the TD group. Third-cycle students did not show statistical differences when compared with their LD-w peers. At the same time, both cycles showed similar gains after receiving the intervention, except for a word dictation task where second-cycle children improved more. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive, early, age-sensitive, and balanced literacy instruction to address LD, especially when older children experience persistent difficulties.
ISSN:0141-0423
1467-9817
DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.70025