Sit Still or Move More? The Impact of Fidgeting on Creativity
Saved in:
| Title: | Sit Still or Move More? The Impact of Fidgeting on Creativity |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Marily Oppezzo (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Psychology. 2026 118(2):194-208. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (DHHS/NIH) |
| Contract Number: | K01HL136702 T32HL00703439 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Grade 6 Intermediate Grades Middle Schools Grade 7 Junior High Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Physical Activities, Student Behavior, Grade 6, Grade 7, Middle School Students, Creative Thinking, Attention, Psychomotor Skills, Movement Education, Manipulative Materials, Object Manipulation, Personal Autonomy, Memory |
| DOI: | 10.1037/edu0000980 |
| ISSN: | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
| Abstract: | Many modern classrooms impose constraints on student movement, both physical (e.g., stable, upright chairs) and psychological (e.g., norms that "being still" signals paying attention). We conducted two separate studies with 32 sixth-grade (11- to 12-year-old) and 43 seventh-grade (12- to 13-year-old) students. Study 1 was a within-subject design and compared students' creative ideation on the alternate uses test and a verbal memory task through two conditions: sit still (on a regular chair with instructions to not move) or freedom to move (on a wiggle stool with ability to move as they wanted). There was a significant effect of condition on novel ideas, as well as number of novel ideas/total ideation (creativity ratio). There was no significant difference by condition on the verbal memory task. Study 2 was a within-subject design. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, each student completed two of three conditions: sit still, freedom to move, and sit as usual (on a regular chair with instructions to sit as if they were paying attention in class). This study compared students' creative ideation and a focused attention task instead of Study 1's memory task. There was a significant effect of condition on novel ideas and creativity ratio, but pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant. There was no condition effect on focused attention. The freedom to move effects appear selective only for creative ideation. Implications for future research and small classroom changes to support natural movement are discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1507576 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Many modern classrooms impose constraints on student movement, both physical (e.g., stable, upright chairs) and psychological (e.g., norms that "being still" signals paying attention). We conducted two separate studies with 32 sixth-grade (11- to 12-year-old) and 43 seventh-grade (12- to 13-year-old) students. Study 1 was a within-subject design and compared students' creative ideation on the alternate uses test and a verbal memory task through two conditions: sit still (on a regular chair with instructions to not move) or freedom to move (on a wiggle stool with ability to move as they wanted). There was a significant effect of condition on novel ideas, as well as number of novel ideas/total ideation (creativity ratio). There was no significant difference by condition on the verbal memory task. Study 2 was a within-subject design. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, each student completed two of three conditions: sit still, freedom to move, and sit as usual (on a regular chair with instructions to sit as if they were paying attention in class). This study compared students' creative ideation and a focused attention task instead of Study 1's memory task. There was a significant effect of condition on novel ideas and creativity ratio, but pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant. There was no condition effect on focused attention. The freedom to move effects appear selective only for creative ideation. Implications for future research and small classroom changes to support natural movement are discussed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
| DOI: | 10.1037/edu0000980 |
