View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Impacts of a STEM-Focused Summer Camp on Postsecondary Aspirations for Rural Appalachian High School Students

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Impacts of a STEM-Focused Summer Camp on Postsecondary Aspirations for Rural Appalachian High School Students
Language: English
Authors: Haley R. Ault (ORCID 0000-0002-2400-5936), Katherine D. Cook, Melinda M. Gibbons (ORCID 0000-0002-7080-0690), Erin E. Hardin (ORCID 0000-0003-4058-1068), Brittney Carneal
Source: Journal of Career Development. 2026 53(4):474-493.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DHHS)
Contract Number: R25GM129177
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Postsecondary Education
Higher Education
Descriptors: Student Experience, High School Students, STEM Education, Summer Programs, Camps, Student Attitudes, Postsecondary Education, Experiential Learning, Mentors, Career Exploration, College Attendance, Self Efficacy, Self Concept, Vocational Interests, Program Effectiveness
Geographic Terms: Tennessee
DOI: 10.1177/08948453261453002
ISSN: 0894-8453
1556-0856
Abstract: Out-of-school experiences are important opportunities for career and educational development, especially for underserved students. This study explored the experiences of rural Appalachian high school students who attended a STEM-based summer camp and the impacts on their college and STEM attitudes and beliefs. Grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994), the camp provided hands-on learning experiences, mentorship, and career exploration opportunities with the goal of increasing students' college-going self-efficacy, science identity, and STEM career interest. Findings indicate that students who attended the summer program experienced an immediate increase in self-efficacy and science identity following the summer camp, as well as a positive increase in STEM career interest over time compared to a matched sample of non-participants. These results highlight the potential of out-of-school STEM programming to support college and career development and extend the longer-term impact of STEM interventions.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1508593
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFMF6UfmIrcCuxwH6Axj-HvAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDFNuSRR6Tbk1RLvZbwIBEICBmxAwDbJ-mdKnKauvK9LvmGpVJVRacn7zJSlNDvNy7aR3z4Sq4lFq4gOuPuaAvVRwyT0RhMTfuM9-cRw87gXxkZkrUoR3SU5rqVqPoAje4d3mtmq6tQUpTQd7_iNk61MAT91MvD7tmC_Ghu_IhtNIB-2Aiw6knAx73btmrgaZciV9GrOYrhulD3foK_26--lLAaZziwNZa4uDdC3q
Text:
  Availability: 1
  Value: <anid>AN0194543399;[2yf6]01aug.26;2026Jun16.01:42;v2.2.500</anid> <title id="AN0194543399-1">Impacts of a STEM-Focused Summer Camp on Postsecondary Aspirations for Rural Appalachian High School Students </title> <p>Out-of-school experiences are important opportunities for career and educational development, especially for underserved students. This study explored the experiences of rural Appalachian high school students who attended a STEM-based summer camp and the impacts on their college and STEM attitudes and beliefs. Grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994), the camp provided hands-on learning experiences, mentorship, and career exploration opportunities with the goal of increasing students' college-going self-efficacy, science identity, and STEM career interest. Findings indicate that students who attended the summer program experienced an immediate increase in self-efficacy and science identity following the summer camp, as well as a positive increase in STEM career interest over time compared to a matched sample of non-participants. These results highlight the potential of out-of-school STEM programming to support college and career development and extend the longer-term impact of STEM interventions.</p> <p>Keywords: social cognitive career theory; college-going self-efficacy; STEM interest; rural Appalachia; career intervention</p> <p>For decades, United States employers and the labor force have continued to place a high value on postsecondary education. Individuals with more education after high school are more likely to receive higher wages and experience lower levels of unemployment ([<reflink idref="bib53" id="ref1">53</reflink>]). Given these trends, educators, administrators, and legislators have aligned in prioritizing postsecondary readiness to increase the number of high school students applying, attending, and completing postsecondary education degrees and certifications. In turn, the rate of college attainment has steadily increased over time, with 38% of people aged 25 and older holding at least a bachelor's degree in 2021 compared to only 30% in 2010 ([<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref2">36</reflink>]). Due to rapid technological advances, there is an increasing demand for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) related careers, specifically. Along with the demand for workers, a need exists for advanced job-specific skills, which continues to widen the gap in filling STEM positions ([<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref3">13</reflink>]). Because of a shortage of these advanced skills, STEM careers tend to be among the highest-paying positions, with the BLS reporting that the national average wage of STEM jobs is nearly double that of non-STEM jobs ([<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref4">17</reflink>]).</p> <p>Despite the gains in educational attainment and degree completion ([<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref5">36</reflink>]), there continue to be educational disparities in college attendance and graduation rates for underrepresented students, specifically first-generation college students, students from low-income families, and underrepresented racial and ethnic groups ([<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref6">1</reflink>]). In 2020, 54% of undergraduates' parents did not have a bachelor's degree and 26% of undergraduates' parents held no postsecondary education at all ([<reflink idref="bib45" id="ref7">45</reflink>]). Although first-generation college students make up a significant percentage of undergraduate student enrollment, they are less likely to enroll in STEM majors or successfully complete their STEM degrees than continuing-education peers ([<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref8">8</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref9">40</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib43" id="ref10">43</reflink>]). Given the growing demand for a diverse STEM workforce, intentional efforts are needed to expand awareness of STEM careers and postsecondary pathways for students from underrepresented backgrounds. In this manuscript, we explore the impact of a summer camp program for underrepresented high school students on their college-going and STEM beliefs.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-2">Rural Appalachian High School Students</hd> <p>Students from rural Appalachian communities are one subgroup that might benefit from greater support in college and STEM aspirations, as students from this population often face educational barriers to developing STEM identity. These include limited access to broadband internet, which may restrict teacher and student use of technology; fewer opportunities for advanced coursework due to funding and staffing limitations in schools; and different educational values that emphasize community involvement and local opportunities for work ([<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref11">52</reflink>]). Importantly, the geographical isolation and extractive history of the coal-mining and railroad industry create systemic barriers beyond education that may limit opportunity as well ([<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref12">52</reflink>]). Rural Appalachians, compared to those from other rural regions broadly, tend to have lower high school completion rates, fewer residents with bachelor's degrees, and higher unemployment and poverty rates (Appalachian Regional Commission, n.d.). Taken together, these disparities in educational attainment may be attributed to, or further exacerbated by, beliefs related to college-going, or their ability to get into and be successful in college ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref13">18</reflink>]).</p> <p>Further, rural Appalachian residents with bachelor's degrees are underrepresented in science and engineering ([<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref14">50</reflink>]). Given that family support and expectations for education are well-documented influences on career choice and postsecondary aspirations for this population, the underrepresentation in STEM role models is notable ([<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref15">2</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref16">3</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref17">5</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref18">52</reflink>]). Specifically, Agger and colleagues' (2018) investigation of family influence on educational aspirations and postsecondary enrollment indicate that higher educational expectations from parents may relate to increased postsecondary enrollment.</p> <p>With fewer rural Appalachian adults holding bachelor's degrees, many of their children may be the first in their families to pursue higher education. Prospective first-generation college students (PFGCS) may be at a disadvantage if they are not exposed to information about the college process; however, this barrier may be mitigated in rural communities through support from their schools, including their teachers and school counselors ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref19">31</reflink>]). In addition to concerns related to information and preparation, rural Appalachian students may also choose to not enroll in postsecondary education because they need to financially support themselves and their families ([<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref20">27</reflink>]). In fact, there was an 18% decrease in FAFSA completion for rural students from 2019 to 2020 (Postsecondary National Policy Institute [[<reflink idref="bib41" id="ref21">41</reflink>]). Furthermore, data highlights the underrepresentation of rural students in STEM programs, as only 11% of rural students completed STEM degrees within 6 years of high school graduation compared to urban (14%) and suburban students (17%; [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref22">37</reflink>]).</p> <p>Collectively, these findings suggests that rural Appalachian students may benefit from increased STEM-related career exposure and structured support that builds on their existing strengths. Despite documented challenges in postsecondary exploration, rural Appalachian youth often demonstrate resilience, adaptability, and a strong orientation toward community well-being ([<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref23">19</reflink>]), which are qualities that can be valuable assets in STEM fields that emphasize teamwork, application, and addressing real-world problems.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-3">STEM-Focused Career Development</hd> <p>A significant body of research suggests that interventions focused on developing STEM awareness and interest can increase self-efficacy ([<reflink idref="bib55" id="ref24">55</reflink>]), STEM and college persistence ([<reflink idref="bib49" id="ref25">49</reflink>]), and a sense of belonging in STEM ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref26">39</reflink>]), emphasizing the importance of continued efforts to intervene, especially with students from underrepresented backgrounds. In the educational system, educators tend to focus more on technology- and math-related skills to encourage their students to pursue STEM careers ([<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref27">11</reflink>]). However, it is recommended that educators take an integrated approach to STEM education, which involves helping students expand their knowledge of STEM fields beyond just math and technology ([<reflink idref="bib46" id="ref28">46</reflink>]). This might involve introducing students to a wide variety of STEM careers, applying STEM knowledge, and generating interest in STEM ([<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref29">47</reflink>]). In addition, current efforts are being made to diversify workers in STEM careers (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref30">26</reflink>]). Interventions to increase students' awareness of STEM careers have been used to increase the likelihood that students in underserved communities can obtain STEM employment.</p> <p>One specific type of intervention is <emph>out-of-school programming</emph>. These include after-school and summer programs designed to increase STEM knowledge, skills, or attitudes, and often recruit underrepresented middle and high school students ([<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref31">56</reflink>]). A recent nationwide study of first-year undergraduate students explored the impact of summer STEM programs and found that students who participated were more likely to have STEM career aspirations entering college ([<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref32">32</reflink>]). These programs range in length and focus, and research provides preliminary evidence that both shorter and longer programs can be effective ([<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref33">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref34">38</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref35">56</reflink>]). Programs that include both academic and social activities tend to be more impactful overall on STEM interest ([<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref36">56</reflink>]), with shorter programs having a greater impact on STEM attitudes and motivation ([<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref37">38</reflink>]). Beyond increasing knowledge and interest, out-of-school STEM programs may also play an important role in shaping students' sense of connection and identification with STEM fields.</p> <p>[<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref38">30</reflink>] describe STEM identity as a combination of a "sense of belonging" and "social acceptance" (p. 591). The researchers argue that STEM identity is an important social identity, shaped by the experience of feeling welcomed and accepted within the community of STEM professionals ([<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref39">30</reflink>]). According to [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref40">34</reflink>], supporting students in STEM involves increasing their STEM identity, rather than only generating interest, improving their proficiency in STEM, and helping students connect with STEM mentors. Students who receive access to mentorship, research opportunities, and study support are more likely to persist in STEM majors and continue on to STEM careers ([<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref41">14</reflink>]). Still, there are limitations for underrepresented populations that prevent them from receiving these types of support. For instance, research indicates that individuals from underrepresented communities, like rural Appalachia, may lack sufficient mentorship ([<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref42">4</reflink>]), access to safe and inclusive environments ([<reflink idref="bib9" id="ref43">9</reflink>]), or may encounter stereotypes ([<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref44">51</reflink>]). Addressing these barriers may contribute to students' aspirations for pursuing college and the likelihood of pursuing a STEM field.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-4">Out-of-School Summer Intervention: Camp</hd> <p>As previously noted, out-of-school STEM interventions can take a variety of forms. Our summer camp intervention is guided by the interest and choice model of Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref45">33</reflink>]), which proposes that individuals' career-related interests and goals are shaped by personal beliefs about their own abilities (self-efficacy), perceived benefits of career-related actions (outcome expectations), and real-world opportunities that facilitate career aspirations (contextual learning experiences). In this study, we apply the SCCT framework to college-going experiences centered around self-efficacy and interest development, providing a more proximal sense of students' interests and self-efficacy beliefs related to their college-going pursuits. Self-efficacy can be increased by engaging in experiences (performance accomplishments), watching others be successful in the experience (vicarious experiences), receiving positive feedback from supportive others (verbal encouragement), and feeling positive or negative emotions when engaging in the activity (affective states; [<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref46">6</reflink>]). College-going self-efficacy describes individuals' beliefs about both attending and persisting in college (e.g., financial considerations, family support, academic preparedness; [<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref47">18</reflink>]). Higher levels of college-going self-efficacy are consistently associated with a greater likelihood of pursuing or performing tasks related to college attendance and success, with outcome expectations also playing an important role in the broader SCCT model ([<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref48">7</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref49">18</reflink>]).</p> <p>SCCT has been used as a theoretical framework for a wide variety of college and career interventions for high school and college students ([<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref50">10</reflink>]). Many of these interventions focus on group counseling (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref51">16</reflink>]), classroom curriculum (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref52">20</reflink>]), multimodal workshops (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref53">35</reflink>]), and college campus visits (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib21" id="ref54">21</reflink>]). In one study, researchers evaluated the effectiveness of an immersive summer camp in increasing interest in STEM careers and enhancing science self-efficacy by engaging students in conversations with STEM mentors, participating in hands-on STEM activities, and immersing students in the college experience ([<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref55">12</reflink>]).</p> <p>While many out-of-school STEM interventions have demonstrated positive effects on students' self-efficacy and interest in science ([<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref56">12</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref57">56</reflink>]), most have focused on broad student populations or only urban minority students. Additionally, the content within the interventions often centers on teaching STEM concepts or technical skills, with less emphasis on how students develop confidence, identity, and aspirations related to STEM and college-going.</p> <p>In the present study, we discuss a summer camp that was designed to address the unique needs of students from rural Appalachian communities by integrating culturally relevant, health-science projects connected to STEM concepts and local community issues. The camp's activities were designed to provide performance accomplishments, vicarious learning, and verbal encouragement that could strengthen students' self-efficacy in their ability to succeed in college and STEM fields. In addition to examining self-efficacy, science identity, and STEM career interest as proximal outcomes, the employment of near-peer mentors from a similar geographical context supports representation and promote vicarious learning. By connecting hands-on STEM exploration activities with opportunities for developing college-going self-efficacy, this study sought to examine a short-term, SCCT-grounded summer camp, specifically designed for rural Appalachian students. This study expands on the previous research on PFGCS aspirations, as well as out-of-school programming, by examining the efficacy of an immersive learning experience. This study's research questions were as follows: (<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref58">1</reflink>) To what extent does a summer STEM camp intervention impact students' college-going self-efficacy and science identity from pre- to post-intervention? (<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref59">2</reflink>) Is this change in college-going self-efficacy sustained in a three-month follow-up after the camp? (<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref60">3</reflink>) Do campers demonstrate different changes in college-going self-efficacy and STEM career interest when compared to non-campers? (<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref61">4</reflink>) How do students describe their Camp experience and its influence on career options?</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-5">Method</hd> <p>This study is part of a multi-year federal grant-funded program aimed at increasing awareness of postsecondary education and STEM fields in rural Appalachian high school students. The larger project provides a multi-week curriculum intervention to ninth and tenth-grade students in four partner high schools in Central and South Central Appalachia during the regular academic calendar. The in-school curriculum is a SCCT-grounded, manualized intervention that includes training of all team members, along with weekly supervision and consultation among team members, curriculum leaders, and project staff to ensure fidelity of delivery. While related to the camp intervention, the in-school curriculum is focused on reducing barriers to career and postsecondary exploration, spanning across diverse postsecondary education options (e.g., two-year college, vocational school, and military). All students from the partner schools who receive the in-school curriculum are invited to participate in the camp intervention; however, the summer camp intervention is not a direct extension of the in-school curriculum, presenting an opportunity to investigate its unique outcomes.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-6">Participants</hd> <p>The participants in this study were 138 students from four high schools in Tennessee. All rising 10th, 11th, and 12th graders at the participating high schools were invited to submit an application to attend camp. To offset any financial barriers to attending camp (e.g., transportation and absence from work), each student was provided with a gift card for attending the 4 days of camp. Students completed a brief online application to express their interest in attending. Due to limited available spots, student applications were reviewed by the grant leadership team and prioritized for acceptance based on (<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref62">1</reflink>) students who were first-time camp attendees and (<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref63">2</reflink>) students' narrative descriptions about why they felt the camp experience would be beneficial to their development.</p> <p>In this study, we examined 81 students who attended the out-of-school Camp intervention over a two-year period (Summer 2023 and Summer 2024) and 57 students who made up a comparison group. The comparison group included students from these same four high schools who did not attend Camp. Of the total participants (<emph>N</emph> = 138), participants identified as White (<emph>N</emph> = 117), American Indian (<emph>N</emph> = 10), Black or African American (<emph>N</emph> = 11), Pacific Islander (<emph>N</emph> = 2), and Asian (<emph>N</emph> = 1), with participants able to select more than one racial identity. Ethnicity was reported separately, with most identifying as non-Hispanic/Latino (<emph>N</emph> = 114). Over half of students indicated at least one of their parents or caregivers had completed some college (continuing generation, 59%), with about 19% indicating neither parent had attended any schooling after high school (prospective first-generation), and about 22% who did not know about their parents' educational level (unsure). A full description of the participants by intervention group is outlined in Table 1.</p> <p>Table 1. Participant Demographics</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="top"><tr><th align="left" rowspan="2">Characteristic</th><th align="left" colspan="2">Camper (<italic>N</italic> = 81)</th><th align="left" colspan="2">Comparison (<italic>N</italic> = 57)</th><th align="left" colspan="2">Total (<italic>N</italic> = 138)</th></tr><tr><th align="left"><italic>n</italic></th><th align="left">%</th><th align="left"><italic>n</italic></th><th align="left">%</th><th align="left"><italic>n</italic></th><th align="left">%</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left" colspan="7">Gender</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Female</td><td align="char" char=".">50</td><td align="char" char=".">61.7</td><td align="char" char=".">37</td><td align="char" char=".">64.9</td><td align="char" char=".">87</td><td align="char" char=".">63.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Male</td><td align="char" char=".">22</td><td align="char" char=".">27.2</td><td align="char" char=".">19</td><td align="char" char=".">33.3</td><td align="char" char=".">41</td><td align="char" char=".">29.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Non-binary</td><td align="char" char=".">3</td><td align="char" char=".">3.7</td><td align="char" char=".">0</td><td align="left">-</td><td align="char" char=".">3</td><td align="char" char=".">2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Did not respond</td><td align="char" char=".">6</td><td align="char" char=".">7.4</td><td align="char" char=".">1</td><td align="char" char=".">1.8</td><td align="char" char=".">7</td><td align="char" char=".">5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="7">First-generation</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Continuing generation</td><td align="char" char=".">47</td><td align="char" char=".">58.0</td><td align="char" char=".">35</td><td align="char" char=".">61.4</td><td align="char" char=".">82</td><td align="char" char=".">59.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Prospective first-generation</td><td align="char" char=".">14</td><td align="char" char=".">17.3</td><td align="char" char=".">12</td><td align="char" char=".">21.1</td><td align="char" char=".">26</td><td align="char" char=".">18.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Unsure</td><td align="char" char=".">20</td><td align="char" char=".">24.7</td><td align="char" char=".">10</td><td align="char" char=".">17.5</td><td align="char" char=".">30</td><td align="char" char=".">21.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="7">Race</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> American Indian</td><td align="char" char=".">6</td><td align="char" char=".">7.4</td><td align="char" char=".">4</td><td align="char" char=".">7.0</td><td align="char" char=".">10</td><td align="char" char=".">7.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Asian</td><td align="char" char=".">1</td><td align="char" char=".">1.2</td><td align="char" char=".">0</td><td align="left">-</td><td align="char" char=".">1</td><td align="char" char=".">0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Black/African American</td><td align="char" char=".">6</td><td align="char" char=".">7.4</td><td align="char" char=".">5</td><td align="char" char=".">8.8</td><td align="char" char=".">11</td><td align="char" char=".">8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Pacific Islander</td><td align="char" char=".">2</td><td align="char" char=".">2.4</td><td align="char" char=".">0</td><td align="left">-</td><td align="char" char=".">2</td><td align="char" char=".">1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> White</td><td align="char" char=".">62</td><td align="char" char=".">76.5</td><td align="char" char=".">55</td><td align="char" char=".">96.5</td><td align="char" char=".">117</td><td align="char" char=".">84.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="7">Hispanic/Latino</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Yes</td><td align="char" char=".">10</td><td align="char" char=".">12.3</td><td align="char" char=".">4</td><td align="char" char=".">7.0</td><td align="char" char=".">14</td><td align="char" char=".">10.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> No</td><td align="char" char=".">63</td><td align="char" char=".">77.8</td><td align="char" char=".">53</td><td align="char" char=".">93.0</td><td align="char" char=".">116</td><td align="char" char=".">84.1</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>1 <emph>Note.</emph> Participants were able to select more than one racial group.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-7">Instrumentation</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0194543399-8">College-Going Self-Efficacy Scale</hd> <p>The College-Going Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (CGSES-SF; [<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref64">24</reflink>]) is a 14-item measure for assessing an individual's perceptions about their ability to complete tasks necessary for postsecondary attendance and success. Participants rate their level of confidence for completing each task using a 4-point Likert scale with 1 indicating "not at all sure" and 4 indicating "very sure." Example items include "I can choose a good college." "I can get accepted to a college." and "I could pick the right things to study in college." Adapted from a longer instrument measuring the same construct ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref65">18</reflink>]), the developers of the CGSES-SF found an internal consistency of α =.92 ([<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref66">24</reflink>]). The scale has been used for Latino middle and high school students ([<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref67">22</reflink>]) and rural Appalachian high school students ([<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref68">44</reflink>]), showing correlations with related variables, such as math self-efficacy ([<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref69">44</reflink>]) and educational barriers ([<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref70">22</reflink>]), as would be predicted by SCCT. These studies reported Cronbach's alphas of.97 ([<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref71">22</reflink>]) and.95 ([<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref72">44</reflink>]). The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency in the current sample (α =.91).</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-9">Science Identity Scale</hd> <p>The Science Identity Scale (SIS; [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref73">54</reflink>]) is a five-item measure that assesses how much a student considers themselves or believes others consider them as a person who is associated with science. The measure includes four items: "I am a science person." "My family sees me as a science person." "My friends see me as a science person." and "My teachers see me as a science person." Students answer each item on a 4-point scale (1 = NO!, 2 = No, 3 = Yes, 4 = YES!). The fifth item asks students to choose the statement that best fits them between "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) are not for me: I am definitely not a scientific/technological person." "If I can, I prefer to avoid doing STEM activities, or talking about those themes. I do not consider myself a scientific/technological person." "I enjoy STEM, and I do have some personal qualities that can be good for a scientific/technological person." and "I identify myself as a scientific/technological person." The original scale demonstrated an internal consistency of.84 across a sample of middle and high school students ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref74">54</reflink>]). The SIS has been adapted for multiple contexts, including measuring math identity in international students ([<reflink idref="bib42" id="ref75">42</reflink>]) and assessing science identity in middle school after-school science clubs ([<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref76">25</reflink>]). Prior research has demonstrated construct validity through associations between SIS and theoretically linked SCCT variables, such as career outcome expectations, math self-efficacy, and STEM career interests ([<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref77">28</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref78">29</reflink>]). In the current sample, the scale presented an internal consistency of α =.85.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-10">Math-Science Interest</hd> <p>As part of the larger project, students completed a 4-item Math-Science Interest (MSInt) scale to assess their interest in learning general math, advanced math, general science, and advanced science topics. Responses were averaged to yield an overall math-science interest score that could range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater interest in learning about math and science. In previous research with rural Appalachian high school students ([<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref79">44</reflink>]), the measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α =.83) and evidence for construct validity (e.g., students who reported higher levels of STEM career interests also had higher MSInt scores).</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-11">STEM Interest and Program Evaluation Survey</hd> <p>Participants completed researcher-developed items to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the overall program. The survey was administered both during the in-school curriculum and at Camp in alignment with the goals of the grant project. The items related to levels of understanding of postsecondary topics (e.g., how to explore financial aid options, how to make goals for the future) and interest in postsecondary pathways (e.g., two-year college, STEM careers). For this study, we utilized the single item "How interested are you in a STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) career?" as a measure of STEM career interest. Due to a change in survey format across the time points, responses at baseline and follow-up were collected on a 1 to 5 scale, whereas responses during camp were collected on a 1 to 10 scale. Standardized scores were used to complete analysis across time points. During the Camp evaluation survey, we also asked participants to list up to two careers of interest and describe their overall perceptions of the Camp experience.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-12">Procedures</hd> <p>As part of the larger grant project, the researchers obtained IRB approval through the university for the collection of research and program evaluation data. Each fall, all 9th and 10th grade students who are enrolled in the project's participating schools completed online surveys which included CGSES-SF and SIS. To reduce participant fatigue and minimize use of class time, students were randomly assigned to complete a subset of related measures, including MSInt. In our analysis, we identify the fall data point prior to Camp as "Baseline" and the first fall following Camp as "Follow-Up." After students applied to attend the Summer Camp Intervention ("Camp") and received acceptance, the students and their families attended an information session about Camp where the caregivers provided permission to participate in Camp activities. Students completed paper surveys on the first (Pre-Intervention) and last day of Camp (Post-Intervention) that included the CGSES-SF, the SIS, and the program evaluation survey. All paper surveys were entered into the computer by a grant team member. See Table 2 for a list of measures administered to students across the study.</p> <p>Table 2. Measures Administered Across Time</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="top"><tr><th align="left">Data point</th><th align="left">Time</th><th align="left">CGSES-SF</th><th align="left">MSInt</th><th align="left">SIS</th><th align="left">STEM career interest</th><th align="left">Camp program evaluation</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left">Baseline (T0)</td><td align="left">Collected in school during fall semester (August) prior to Camp attendance</td><td align="left">CamperComparison</td><td align="left">CamperComparison*</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">CamperComparison</td><td align="left">​</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Pre-intervention (T1)</td><td align="left">Collected on the first day of Camp (June)</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">​</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">​</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Post-intervention (T2)</td><td align="left">Collected on the last day of Camp (June)</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">​</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">Camper</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Follow-up (T3)</td><td align="left">Collected in school during fall semester (August) after Camp attendance</td><td align="left">CamperComparison</td><td align="left">CamperComparison*</td><td align="left">Camper</td><td align="left">CamperComparison</td><td align="left">​</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>2 <sups>*</sups>In the Fall surveys, approximately one-half of students completed MSInt due to random assignment of complementary measures.</p> <p>Camp was held on the campus of a southeastern university for four consecutive days during the summer terms of 2023 and 2024. The Camp facilitators arranged transportation for students ("Campers") from their local high school to the university. The Campers arrived on campus by 8:30 AM and departed around 6:30 PM each day. Campers were provided breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks daily while attending Camp. Each day of Camp followed a structured program of activities of both academic and applied learning experiences aligned with social cognitive career theory (SCCT; [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref80">33</reflink>]). To support college-going self-efficacy, students received lectures on college admissions and financial aid and participated in a campus scavenger hunt. To address interest in STEM careers, students engaged in hands-on STEM lab experiences and met with experts across diverse STEM fields (e.g., agriculture, biology, and computer science). Lastly, Campers engaged in a research-based project throughout the week focused on addressing real-world health issues in their local communities to help support students' science identity or seeing themselves as a "science person" ([<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref81">54</reflink>]). The activities and intended outcomes of this intervention are outlined in Table 3.</p> <p>Table 3. Camp Components and SCCT Alignment</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="top"><tr><th align="left">Camp experience</th><th align="left">Intended outcome</th><th align="left">Connection to SCCT Model</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left">Campus tour and scavenger hunt</td><td align="left">How confident am I that I could navigate a college campus?</td><td align="left">College-going self-efficacy (performance accomplishment)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Brain lecture led by the university faculty</td><td align="left">How confident am I that I could be successful in a college course?</td><td align="left">College-going self-efficacy (performance accomplishment)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Team-building activities with Camp Counselors</td><td align="left">How similar am I to other successful college students?</td><td align="left">College-going self-efficacy (vicarious learning/positive affective state)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">College presentations (Admissions, financial Aid)</td><td align="left">What do I need to know in order to attend college?</td><td align="left">College-going self-efficacy (verbal encouragement)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Dinner speakers</td><td align="left">Do I have what it takes to attend college?</td><td align="left">College-going self-efficacy (verbal encouragement)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Health-science issues in My Community Project</td><td align="left">How can attending college benefit my community?</td><td align="left">Outcome expectations (perceived value in STEM)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Visit to the Agriculture Campus</td><td align="left">What is it like to pursue a STEM major?</td><td align="left">Science self-efficacy (performance accomplishment) and interest</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Visit STEM labs (e.g., materials engineering, anatomy simulation)</td><td align="left">What types of research do undergraduate students conduct?</td><td align="left">Science self-efficacy (performance accomplishment) and interest</td></tr><tr><td align="left">STEM mini-labs (e.g., marshmallow catapult, data science, infant perception)</td><td align="left">What types of questions can STEM researchers answer?</td><td align="left">Science self-efficacy (performance accomplishment/positive affective state) and interest</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Research presentations from peers</td><td align="left">What types of research can high school students conduct?</td><td align="left">Science self-efficacy (vicarious learning)</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>Camp counselors were hired as near-peer role models to help facilitate and accompany students during activities on campus. Drawing on Bandura's theory (1997), near-peer mentors can help to facilitate self-efficacy through vicarious learning and observing others successfully accomplish the task. Counselors consisted of current undergraduate and graduate students from the university, many of whom identified as first-generation college students or from rural communities. Many counselors had participated in the multi-week curriculum intervention during the school year or had a personal interest in supporting first-generation college students. Prior to Camp, counselors completed an orientation focused on culturally affirming and supportive practices for working with rural Appalachian youth, including strategies for building rapport and validating students' strengths. The orientation also introduced counselors to the goals of Camp, introducing the concepts behind SCCT and emphasizing how activities were designed to promote college-going self-efficacy and interest in STEM.</p> <p>Each Camper was assigned to a small group led by two university counselors. In their small groups, Campers completed community-building activities, researched their health-science presentations, and debriefed after each of the scheduled experiences. With the support of their counselors, each small group identified a health issue within their community and explored how it could be addressed through STEM careers. Some of the topics that students researched included concerns related to nutrition, chronic lung diseases, mental health, and substance use. For example, one group of Campers discussed the impacts of substance use on their community and proposed that health teachers can develop preventative programming against substance use in schools, while psychologists can implement therapeutic interventions for those struggling with substance use.</p> <p>Data collected from fall surveys were used as baseline scores in a matched-comparison group design to establish a control group of students who received the larger in-school intervention, but did not attend camp. Matched-comparison group design is a quasi-experimental research design frequently used in educational research settings without randomized control groups. This approach was intended to reduce baseline group differences and partially mitigate threats to internal validity by assuming that both groups were exposed to similar contextual and developmental influences over time. Following procedures by [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref82">23</reflink>], each student who attended Camp was matched with a student who did not attend Camp from the same school, grade level, and gender, and who also met as many of these additional criteria as possible, in order: who had a baseline CGSES-SF score within 0.25 z-score of the Camper, was of the same first-generation status, and was within 0.25 z-score of the Camper on math/science interest. When two possible comparison students had z-scores equidistant above and below the Camper's score, we selected the student with the higher baseline score for the matched comparison. We prioritized matching based on CGSES-SF scores rather than MSInt scores for two reasons. First, while virtually all students completed the CGSES-SF, MSInt scores were missing for approximately one-half of potential comparison students due to random assignment survey branching. Second, according to SCCT ([<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref83">33</reflink>]), self-efficacy is a direct outcome of learning experiences, whereas interests are more distal; thus, we expected the learning experiences provided by Camp to have the greater impact on self-efficacy, making it relatively a more important control variable.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-13">Results</hd> <p>Since data were collected across multiple time points, some gaps in the data exist. Across the two camps, 74 students completed both pre- and post-surveys. For the purposes of analysis, the 2023 and 2024 cohorts were combined into a single Camper group. If a student attended Camp more than once, we only utilized the data from their first participation and removed any duplicate cases. For the analyses regarding the sustained impacts of Camp, data were collected during the Fall semester prior to attending Camp (Baseline) and the Fall immediately following Camp (Follow-Up). To ensure equivalence between our matched-comparison groups, we conducted an independent t-test between 57 Campers and 57 comparison students. Students who attended Camp (<emph>M</emph> = 2.86, <emph>SD</emph> =.68) were not significantly different from the comparison group (<emph>M</emph> = 2.85, <emph>SD</emph> =.65) in CGSES-SF at Baseline, <emph>t</emph>(<reflink idref="bib112" id="ref84">112</reflink>) =.03, <emph>p</emph> =.66. Given these time gaps and participant attrition associated with longitudinal studies, independent analyses may report differing sample sizes.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-14">Research Question 1: Short-Term Impacts</hd> <p>A paired samples t-test was conducted to determine the effect of Camp on college-going self-efficacy and science identity. The results of the t-test indicate that there was a significant increase in college-going self-efficacy from pre-intervention (<emph>M =</emph> 2.96, <emph>SD</emph> =.53) to post-intervention (<emph>M =</emph> 3.20, <emph>SD</emph> =.53; <emph>t</emph>[<reflink idref="bib73" id="ref85">73</reflink>] = −4.89, <emph>p</emph> <.001, <emph>d</emph> =.44). Additionally, there was a significant increase in science identity between pre-intervention (<emph>M =</emph> 2.75, <emph>SD</emph> =.62) to post-intervention (<emph>M =</emph> 2.90, <emph>SD</emph> =.65; <emph>t</emph>[<reflink idref="bib73" id="ref86">73</reflink>] = −2.43, <emph>p</emph> =.02, <emph>d</emph> = 52). Each of these increases represents a medium effect size where college-going self-efficacy tended to increase by about 44% and science identity increased by 52% of a standard deviation across the duration of Camp.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-15">Research Question 2: Three-Month Follow-Up</hd> <p>A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate whether there were any sustained changes in college-going self-efficacy (<emph>N</emph> = 51) measured the first day of Camp, immediately following Camp, and approximately 3 months after Camp. The repeated-measures ANOVA indicated a significant time effect, Wilks' Lambda =.62, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref87">2</reflink>, 49) = 14.95, <emph>p</emph> <.001. Partial eta squared (η<sups>2</sups> =.38) showed a large effect size. Consistent with this finding, the univariate within-subjects test was also significant, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref88">2</reflink>, 100) = 13.51, <emph>p</emph> <.001, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.21, indicating meaningful changes in CGSES-SF across time. Post hoc comparisons indicated that there was a significant difference before Camp and immediately following Camp (<emph>p</emph> <.001), demonstrating the increase in CGSES-SF. However, scores significantly declined from post-intervention to follow-up (<emph>p</emph> <.001), returning to Baseline levels (<emph>p</emph> =.90).</p> <p>A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted to examine changes in STEM career interest across the four time points using standardized scores to account for differences in response format. The multivariate test revealed no significant overall effect of time on STEM career interest, Wilks' Λ =.899, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref89">3</reflink>, 31) = 1.16, <emph>p</emph> =.34, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.10. Consistent with this finding, the within-subjects test was also non-significant, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref90">3</reflink>, 99) = 1.12, <emph>p</emph> =.34, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.03. All means and standard deviations for the Camper-specific analyses are presented in Table 4.</p> <p>Table 4. Means and Standard Deviations for Measures of Campers Across Pre-, Post-, and Follow-Up</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="top"><tr><th align="left">Measure</th><th align="left">Baseline<italic>M</italic> (SD)</th><th align="left">Pre-intervention<italic>M</italic> (SD)</th><th align="left">Post-intervention<italic>M</italic> (SD)</th><th align="left">Follow-Up<italic>M</italic> (SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left">CGSES-SF</td><td align="left">2.86 (.69)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.96 (.53)</td><td align="char" char="(">3.20 (.53)*</td><td align="left">2.93 (.56)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">SIS</td><td align="left">—</td><td align="char" char="(">2.75 (.62)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.90 (.65)*</td><td align="left">—</td></tr><tr><td align="left">STEM Career int</td><td align="left">6.40 (2.75)</td><td align="char" char="(">8.04 (2.37)*</td><td align="char" char="(">7.79 (2.37)</td><td align="left">6.93 (2.67)</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <ulist> <item>3 <emph>Note.</emph> – Measure not collected at this time point.</item> <item>4 <sups>*</sups><emph>p</emph> <.05 for significant increase from previous time point.</item> </ulist> <hd id="AN0194543399-16">Research Question 3: Comparison Groups</hd> <p>We conducted a mixed repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the differences in CGSES-SF before and after Camp in comparison to the matched-comparison group. We used CGSES-SF from the Fall prior to Camp (Baseline) and CGSES-SF from Fall after the students attended Camp (Follow-Up) as within-subjects factors and the intervention or comparison group as between-subjects factors. The repeated-measures ANOVA did not produce a significant main effect of Time, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref91">1</reflink>, 72) =.85, <emph>p</emph> =.36, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.01, and there was not a significant Time × Group interaction, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref92">1</reflink>, 72) =.13, <emph>p</emph> =.72, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.002. These results indicate that CGSES-SF did not change across the academic year for either group.</p> <p>We conducted a second mixed repeated-measures ANOVA examining differences in STEM career interest from the first Fall to the second Fall. The main effect of Time was not significant, Wilks' Lambda =.99, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref93">1</reflink>, 67) =.53, <emph>p</emph> =.47, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.01, indicating that STEM interest did not change significantly across the year. However, the Time × Group interaction was significant, Wilks' Lambda =.93, <emph>F</emph>(<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref94">1</reflink>,<reflink idref="bib67" id="ref95">67</reflink>) = 4.74, <emph>p</emph> =.03, partial η<sups>2</sups> =.07. Campers demonstrated growth in STEM career interest from baseline (<emph>M</emph> = 3.32) to 1 year follow-up (<emph>M</emph> = 3.95), while non-Campers showed a slight decline from baseline (<emph>M</emph> = 3.07) to follow-up (<emph>M</emph> = 2.94). Means and standard deviations for the third research question are provided in Table 5.</p> <p>Table 5. Means and Standard Deviations for Matched-Comparison ANOVA</p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="top"><tr><th align="left">Measure</th><th align="left">Baseline</th><th align="left">Follow-Up</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td align="left" colspan="3">CGSES-SF</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Camper (<italic>N</italic> = 41)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.87 (.69)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.96 (.54)</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Comparison (<italic>N</italic> = 33)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.84 (.73)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.88 (.79)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="3">STEM Career interest</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Camper (<italic>N</italic> = 37)</td><td align="char" char="(">3.32 (1.27)</td><td align="char" char="(">3.95 (1.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="left"> Comparison (<italic>N</italic> = 32)</td><td align="char" char="(">3.07 (1.49)</td><td align="char" char="(">2.94 (1.39)</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>5 <emph>Note.</emph> Raw means and standard deviations are presented for descriptive purposes. Analyses involving STEM career interest were conducted using standardized scores to account for differences in response scale format across time points.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-17">Research Question 4: Camper Perceptions</hd> <p>In the post-survey, Campers were asked to list up to two career choices they wanted to pursue. Of the 124 careers they listed, 96 were STEM-related. Students also indicated how much learning they experienced from Camp activities. Three-quarters of participants felt that Camp helped them learn about different types of science careers and more than half reported learning a lot about how to apply to college and what to do in high school to better prepare for college.</p> <p>Participants also completed questions about their overall experience with Camp and their perceptions of how Camp influenced their postsecondary and STEM beliefs. Over the two years, 92.5% of Campers reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their camp experience. Their favorite and most interesting activities included visits to the STEM labs and the lecture about the brain. When asked about the most surprising thing they learned during Camp, responses varied, with the most common responses focusing on STEM careers being more possible and college being more affordable than they thought. Some example quotes include "Science is just learning and trying new things," "The most unexpected thing was understanding all the different careers in STEMM," "I knew there were specialty fields but I was surprised by how many there were and getting to see some of the research opportunities," and "That there are lots of scholarships."</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-18">Discussion</hd> <p>This study examined the effectiveness of a week-long out-of-school intervention grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref96">33</reflink>]) for high school students from rural Appalachia. Students participated in an immersive summer camp focused on increasing self-efficacy and interest in attending college and pursuing STEM careers. The mixed results indicate promise for a short-term social cognitive career intervention for high school students while opening further discussion about the long-term impacts.</p> <p>A primary goal of this study was to assess the impacts of a week-long STEM camp on STEM and college aspirations, and our findings supported the immediate increases in students' college-going self-efficacy and science identity following their camp experiences. Given the brief nature of the camp, it is unlikely that this increase was due to maturation or factors unrelated to the camp, suggesting that a short-term out-of-school STEM program can positively impact attitudes and beliefs for underrepresented students. Given that the goal of Camp is to encourage more STEM representation for students from Appalachia, this outcome is important.</p> <p>This study also extends prior research on STEM camps. Whereas many enrichment programs focus primarily on laboratory skills or academic content (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref97">56</reflink>]), our intervention intentionally integrated college-going self-efficacy, financial aid knowledge, and near-peer mentoring, elements that are rarely addressed in tandem within STEM camp interventions. Further, the camp emphasized health-related STEM careers tied to students' rural communities, offering real-world relevance that aligns with SCCT's focus on contextualized learning experiences. Finally, by including a matched-comparison group and a follow-up assessment, this study contributes stronger evidence regarding the persistence and limitations of short-term STEM interventions for underrepresented youth.</p> <p>Our summer camp followed best practices that may have impacted its success. As [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref98">32</reflink>] noted, the odds of ending high school with STEM aspirations significantly increase when students participate in STEM summer programs and increase even more so when the program provides real-life relevance. Our program specifically focuses on researching STEM careers that address a health issue in the students' local communities, creating real-life relevance for the importance of entering the STEM field. Similarly, [<reflink idref="bib56" id="ref99">56</reflink>] highlighted the positive impact of summer programs that include both academic and social activities. Our camp intentionally included academic enrichment through hands-on learning experiences and college information sessions as well as social engagement with near-peer role models and other rural Appalachian high school students.</p> <p>We were encouraged to see the increase in STEM career interest for our campers over time compared to the non-campers. Given that the two groups differed at baseline, our Campers, with their initial higher interest, might have shown an increased interest over time even without the Camp intervention. However, prior research indicates that high school students' STEM aspirations may decline over time, particularly for STEM-underrepresented groups ([<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref100">47</reflink>]). Since STEM career interest increased for our intervention group but not for the comparison group, we feel optimistic that the Camp experience influenced the observed changes in interest. Since an increase in STEM awareness and interest can have positive impacts on college success in STEM fields ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref101">39</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib49" id="ref102">49</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib55" id="ref103">55</reflink>]), interventions such as ours can help to supplement the important work of math and science teachers who facilitate academic skill development in STEM. With diligent efforts being made to diversify STEM fields ([<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref104">26</reflink>]), intentional programming can help to increase the representation of underrepresented students (e.g, racial minority groups, first-generation college students) in various STEM majors and professions.</p> <p>The lack of long-term sustainability of the other attitudes and beliefs is disappointing but not necessarily surprising. We know that rural Appalachian high school students, like other underrepresented groups, face a multitude of college-going and STEM career barriers. Challenges include higher poverty rates, a lack of college-educated role models, and fewer residents with STEM careers ([<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref105">50</reflink>]). Even prolonged summer interventions struggle to impact career and college beliefs (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref106">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib48" id="ref107">48</reflink>]). It is possible that ongoing programming, including programming that occurs during the school year, may be needed to see the long-term impacts of a one-week summer intervention. Additionally, the students' reports of positive satisfaction with the overall programming and the exposure to new STEM careers may lead them to engage in additional career and college development opportunities in the future.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-19">Limitations and Future Directions</hd> <p>As with most studies, our research project had several limitations to note. First, because this was not a true randomized controlled experiment with students assigned by chance to participate or not participate in the camp intervention, we cannot definitively conclude that Camp itself caused short-term increases in self-efficacy and science identity or longer-term changes in STEM career interest. This limitation is partially mitigated by the brief nature of the intervention and the use of a closely matched comparison group; however, the approximately year-long interval between baseline and follow-up assessments introduces potential threats to internal validity, where unmeasured factors may have influenced outcomes independent of the camp experience. Randomly assigning students not to participate in this kind of enrichment activity has ethical challenges; however, future researchers may attempt to utilize true waitlist control groups to test hypotheses about the effects of these programs more rigorously.</p> <p>Relatedly, our participants self-selected to apply to and attend our summer camp, indicating possible increased interest in postsecondary education or STEM careers. Students have various reasons for attending camp, but it is likely that campers had more academic and career motivation than their peers who chose not to participate in our camp. Although our closely matched comparison sample still allows us to examine the longer-term effects on science identity, it is unknown whether camp would have had the same short-term effects on a sample with differing motivations. Also, the response scale used to assess STEM career interest differed across time points due to a procedural inconsistency. Although standardized scores were used to mitigate potential scale-related bias in the analyses, future studies should prioritize consistent instrumentation to allow for more direct comparisons over time.</p> <p>In addition, our participants were all from one of four partner high schools in Tennessee, so their experiences may differ from other rural Appalachian students outside of our grant partnership schools. It would be helpful for future research to assess the utility of our summer camp program with students across Appalachian regions (i.e., Northern or North Central). Also, although rural Appalachia has cultural similarities to rural communities in general, Appalachia is considered a unique subculture with its own traditions and values. We cannot assume that our camp would have the same outcomes with students from non-Appalachian rural communities. Lastly, we were unable to collect full demographic data across all time points which limited our ability to interpret differences across demographic groups (e.g., first-generation status and gender). Future research could examine how these short-term out-of-school interventions are effective across subgroup populations.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-20">Implications for Research and Practice</hd> <p>Out-of-school programming is a useful and supportive practice for encouraging postsecondary education and career exploration. Research demonstrates the impact of these types of programs, but less is known about which practices are most effective. Future studies can explore the specific components of a summer program, such as that in the present study, which will have the biggest impact on college-going and STEM beliefs and attitudes. For example, it may be that hearing about college admissions is a vital component of this type of program, or perhaps simply spending time on a college campus is most helpful. Although our students reported the camp activities they most enjoyed and what they learned from those activities, we did not assess the extent to which each specific activity contributed to their learning.</p> <p>Furthermore, our camp is grounded in SCCT ([<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref108">33</reflink>]), but we only collected data on college-going self-efficacy, STEM identity, and STEM career interest during our program. It is possible that other SCCT variables, such as career outcome expectations or perceived barriers, were impacted by the camp experience, and future research could explore these beliefs. Although we focused on educational rather than occupational outcomes, future longitudinal research could examine how college-going self-efficacy and interests later translate into career outcome expectations and perceptions of career barriers. Relatedly, researchers could investigate how a camp grounded in a different career theory may contribute differently to aspects of career development for underserved students.</p> <p>For those who are considering designing similar programs, we recommend identifying underserved groups within the local community and collaborating with within-group partners to offer programming tailored to their career development needs. Engaging with community members early in the process, such as school counselors, caregivers, and students, can help ensure that the programming is culturally relevant and accessible. The process of developing long-standing partnerships with schools and local organizations can be challenging due to the time commitment and logistical circumstances, but these relationships are integral to the sustainability of programming and its lasting impact on participants. Further, these partnerships can aid in identifying solutions for logistical challenges, such as transportation and financial considerations, to make the program more inclusive and equitable for all participants to attend.</p> <p>Additionally, incorporating information about STEM careers may help address the critical need for job growth in these fields (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref109">14</reflink>]). We specifically sought to include STEM-related activities that were both interactive and informative, such as lab visits and community projects, to not only deepen curiosity and interest but also to encourage participants to envision themselves in STEM careers. Moreover, STEM-specific activities were meant to help participants learn more about the college-going process by exposing them to potential STEM careers and information about how to pursue those paths through education and training. Our program intentionally included near-peer role models and presentations by speakers about relevant college planning topics (e.g., financial aid and study skills) to normalize the college experience and provide tangible information about overcoming potential barriers to college. By incorporating these activities into the program, we hoped to encourage students to view higher education and pursuing STEM careers as attainable goals for their futures.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-21">Conclusion</hd> <p>Rural Appalachian students face a multitude of real and perceived barriers that can contribute to their educational interests and pursuits. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a dedicated out-of-school STEM intervention for rural Appalachian high school students. Grounded in social cognitive career theory, our intervention aimed to increase the college-going self-efficacy, STEM identity, and STEM career interests of this population. Our analysis found mixed, yet promising, results regarding the short and long-term impacts of immersive out-of-school interventions on underserved communities. These findings emphasize the importance of developing intentional programming that addresses the unique needs of the student participants while opening up future discussions about the need for varied programming to support the development of long-term career aspirations.</p> <hd id="AN0194543399-22">ORCID iDs</hd> <p>Haley R. Ault https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2400-5936</p> <p>Melinda M. Gibbons https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7080-0690</p> <p>Erin E. Hardin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-1068</p> <ref id="AN0194543399-23"> <title> References </title> <blist> <bibl id="bib1" idref="ref6" type="bt">1</bibl> <bibtext> ACT Inc. (2019). Condition of college and career readiness 2019. https://<ulink href="http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/secured/documents/cccr-2019/National-CCCR-2019.pdf">www.act.org/content/dam/act/secured/documents/cccr-2019/National-CCCR-2019.pdf</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib2" idref="ref15" type="bt">2</bibl> <bibtext> Agger C., Meece J., Byun S. Y. (2018). The influences of family and place on rural adolescents' educational aspirations and post-secondary enrollment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(12), 2554–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0893-7</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib3" idref="ref16" type="bt">3</bibl> <bibtext> Ali S. R., Saunders J. L. (2006). College expectations of rural Appalachian youth: An exploration of social cognitive career theory factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 55(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00003.x</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib4" idref="ref42" type="bt">4</bibl> <bibtext> Atkins K., Dougan B. M., Dromgold-Sermen M. S., Potter H., Sathy V., Panter A. T. (2020). "Looking at myself in the future": How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib5" idref="ref17" type="bt">5</bibl> <bibtext> Ault H. R., Sexton K., Gibbons M. M., Wynn M. K., Lange R. (2024). Career and college readiness programming of rural Appalachian school counselors: A consensual qualitative research study. Professional School Counseling, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X231225219</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib6" idref="ref46" type="bt">6</bibl> <bibtext> Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib7" idref="ref48" type="bt">7</bibl> <bibtext> Berbery M. L., O'Brien K. M. (2018). Going to college? Latina/Latino high school students' college-going self-efficacy and educational goals. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717695587</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib8" idref="ref8" type="bt">8</bibl> <bibtext> Bettencourt G. M., Manly C. A., Kimball E., Wells R. S. (2020). STEM degree completion and first-generation college students: A cumulative disadvantage approach to the outcomes gap. The Review of Higher Education, 43(3), 753–779. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0006</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib9" idref="ref43" type="bt">9</bibl> <bibtext> Campbell-Montalvo R., Cooke H., Smith C. A., Hughes Miller M., Wao H., Puccia E., Mayberry M., Skvoretz J. (2022). "Now i'm not afraid": The influence of identity-focused STEM professional organizations on the persistence of sexual and gender minority undergraduates in STEM. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 780331. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.780331</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Damodar P., Shetty A., Dsouza M. P., Prakash A., Gudi N. (2024). Crafting careers through theory-driven interventions: A scoping review of the utility of social cognitive career theory and career maturity inventory. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), Article 2308081. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2308081</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Dare E. A., Keratithamkul K., Hiwatig B. M., Li F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers' conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Deemer E. D., Sharma P. (2019). Situational interest and scientific self-efficacy: Influence of an energy science career intervention. The Career Development Quarterly, 67(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12179</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Deming D. J., Noray K. L. (2018). STEM careers and technological change (Vol. 24, No. 25065, pp. 1–67). National Bureau of Economic Research.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Doerschuk P., Bahrim C., Daniel J., Kruger J., Mann J., Martin C. (2016). Closing the gaps and filling the STEM pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 682–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9622-8</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Elam M. E., Donham B. L., Solomon S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program for underrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 35–44. https://<ulink href="http://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1619">www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1619</ulink>.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Falco L. D., Summers J. J. (2019). Improving career decision self-efficacy and STEM self-efficacy in high school girls: Evaluation of an intervention. Journal of Career Development, 46(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317721651</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Fayer S., Lacey A., Watson A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Spotlight on Statistics, 1, 1–35.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gibbons M. M., Borders L. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00186.x</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gibbons M. M., Brown E. C., Daniels S., Rosecrance P., Hardin E. E., Farrell I. (2019). Building on strengths while addressing barriers: Career interventions in rural Appalachian communities. Journal of Career Development, 46(6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319827652</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gibbons M. M., Hardin E. E., Taylor A. L., Brown E., Graham D. (2020). Evaluation of an SCCT-based intervention to increase postsecondary awareness in rural Appalachian youth. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319832972</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Glessner K., Rockinson-Szapkiw A. J., Lopez M. L. (2017). "Yes, I Can": Testing an intervention to increase middle school students' college and career self-efficacy. The Career Development Quarterly, 65(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12110</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gonzalez L. M., Stein G. L., Huq N. (2013). The influence of cultural identity and perceived barriers on college-going beliefs and aspirations of Latino youth in emerging immigrant communities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986312463002</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hanita M., Ansel D., Shakman K. (2017). Matched-comparison group design: An evaluation brief for educational stakeholders. Education Development Center. https://<ulink href="http://www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/matched%5fcomparison%5fgroup%5fdesign.pdf">www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/matched%5fcomparison%5fgroup%5fdesign.pdf</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hardin E. E., Gibbons M. M., Cook K. D., Sexton K., Bagwell L. (2021). Development and validation of a short form of the College-Going Self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720968241</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hill P. W., Kelly G. M., McQuillan J., Ledesma J., Melson M., Gauthier G. R. (2024). Exploring the associations of afterschool science participation and friendships with science identities. Research in Science Education, 54(6), 1155–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10173-6</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Ihrig L. M., Lane E., Mahatmya D., Assouline S. G. (2018). STEM excellence and leadership program: Increasing the level of STEM challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745158</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Irvin M. J., Byun S., Meece J. L., Farmer T. W., Hutchins B. C. (2012). Educational barriers of rural youth: Relation of individual and contextual difference variables. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711420105</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Jiang Z., Tang X., Tan L., Su R., Wei B. (2025). STEM identity and STEM career intention: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00578-8</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kaleva S., Celik I., Nogueiras G., Pursiainen J., Muukkonen H. (2023). Examining the predictors of STEM career interest among upper secondary students in Finland. Educational Research and Evaluation, 28(1–3), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2161579</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kim A. Y., Sinatra G. M., Seyranian V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> King S. B. (2018). Increasing college-going rate, parent involvement, and community participation in rural communities. The Rural Educator, 33(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i2.415</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kitchen J. A., Sonnert G., Sadler P. (2018). The impact of college- and university-run high school summer programs on students' end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 102(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21332</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Lent R. W., Brown S. D., Hackett G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Martin-Hansen L. (2018). Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0150-3</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> McWhirter E. H., Rojas-Araúz B. O., Ortega R., Combs D., Cendejas C., McWhirter B. T. (2019). ALAS: An intervention to promote career development among Latina/o immigrant high school students. Journal of Career Development, 46(6), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319828543</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Digest of education statistics. Table 104.10. Rates of high school completion and bachelor's degree attainment among persons age 25 and over, by race/ethnicity and sex: Selected years, 1910 through 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_104.10.asp</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2024). High school benchmarks. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. https://nscresearchcenter.org/high-school-benchmarks/</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Nugent G., Barker B., Grandgenett N., Adamchuk V. I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782557</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Payne M. R., LaDue N. D., Dugas D., Winitkun D., Schmidt S. (2024). "I feel listened to and heard": How social support fosters a sense of belonging for low‐income STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Peña C., Ruedas-Gracia N., Cohen J. R., Tran N., Stratton M. B. (2022). Ten simple rules for successfully supporting first-generation/low-income (FLI) students in STEM. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(10), Article e1010499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010490</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Postsecondary National Policy Institute. (2023). Rural students in higher education. Postsecondary National Policy Institute. https://pnpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/RuralStudents_Mar23.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Radišić J., Krstić K., Blažanin B., Mićić K., Baucal A., Peixoto F., Schukajlow S. (2024). Am I a math person? Linking math identity with students' motivation for mathematics and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1513–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00811-y</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Riegle-Crumb C., King B., Irizarry Y. (2019). Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x19831006</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Rosecrance P. H., Graham D., Manring S., Cook K. D., Hardin E. E., Gibbons M. M. (2019). Rural Appalachian high school students' college-going and STEMM perceptions. Career Development Quarterly, 67(4), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12202</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> RTI International. (2023). First-generation college students in 2020: Demographic characteristics and postsecondary enrollment: FirstGen Forward. https://firstgen.naspa.org/files/dmfile/15405_NASPA_FactSheet-01.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Sanders M. E. (2012). Integrative stem education as "best practice.". In Middleton H. (Ed.), Explorations of best practice in technology, design, & engineering education (2, pp. 103–117): Griffith Institute for Educational Research.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Saw G., Chang C.-N., Chan H.-Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18787818</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Saw G. K., Swagerty B., Brewington S., Change C. N., Culbertson R. (2019). Out-of-school time STEM program: Students' attitudes toward and career interests in mathematics and science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18702</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Shortlidge E. E., Gray M. J., Estes S., Goodwin E. C. (2024). The value of support: STEM intervention programs impact student persistence and belonging. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(2), ar23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-04-0059</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Srygley S., Khairunnisa N., Elliott D. (2024). The Appalachian region: A data overview from the 2018-2022 American community survey chartbook. Appalachian regional Commission. https://<ulink href="http://www.arc.gov/about-the-appalachian-region/the-chartbook/">www.arc.gov/about-the-appalachian-region/the-chartbook/</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Starr C. R. (2018). "I'm not a science nerd!" STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318793848</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Statti A., Torres K. (2020). The forgotten minority: Exploring deficiencies in access to education and technology in rural America. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1745608</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Education pays, 2023. Career Outlook. https://<ulink href="http://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2024/data-on-display/education-pays.htm">www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2024/data-on-display/education-pays.htm</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Vincent-Ruz P., Schunn C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Williams M. M., George-Jackson C. (2014). Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2014004477</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Young J. R., Ortiz N. A., Young J. L. (2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.61149</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <ref id="AN0194543399-24"> <title> Footnotes </title> <blist> <bibtext> The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: National Institutes of Health, Science Education Partnership Award (R25GM129177).</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <aug> <p>By Haley R. Ault; Katherine D. Cook; Melinda M. Gibbons; Erin E. Hardin and Brittney Carneal</p> <p>Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author</p> <p></p> <p>Haley R. Ault is an Assistant Professor of Counselor Education and Practice at Georgia State University. She earned a PhD in counselor education and supervision from the University of Tennessee. Her research focuses on promoting effectiveness and equity in counseling practice through promoting school counselor leadership identity and advocacy, career development and postsecondary outcomes for students, and assessment practices in counselor education. In her free time, she enjoys reality television, being outdoors, and spending time with her goldendoodle.</p> <p>Katie Cook is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Emory & Henry University in Southwest Virginia. She received her PhD in counseling psychology from the University of Tennessee. Katie's research focuses on examining the intersection between work, mental health, and social change to promote access to meaningful and sustainable employment, particularly among underserved populations. In her free time, she enjoys spending time with family and friends, cooking, and reading.</p> <p>Melinda M. Gibbons is a Professor and Academic Unit Director of Counselor Education in the Department of Counseling, Human Development, and Family Science. She received her PhD in Counseling and Counselor Education from The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her research interests focus on career and educational development for underserved populations, including rural students, first-generation college students, and students with disabilities. Dr. Gibbons has been awarded over $15 million in grant funding for engaged scholarship related to this research agenda. Currently, she serves as PI for a five-year NIH-SEPA grant, PiPES3, which provides postsecondary and STEM awareness programming for rural Appalachian high school students. In her free time, she enjoys spending time with her family and puppy, reading science fiction and mystery novels, and baking.</p> <p>Erin E. Hardin is Professor and interim department head in the Department of Psychology & Neuroscience at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her PhD in counseling psychology from The Ohio State University. Her research has focused on cultural differences in the self and understanding individuals' career development in their unique cultural contexts. Most recently, her work has examined the recruitment and retention of underrepresented individuals in science, technology, engineering, math, and medical science, with particular focus on individuals from rural Appalachia. Her hobbies include cooking, playing poker, and spending time with family.</p> <p>Brittney H. Carneal is a current Counselor Education doctoral student at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her M.Ed. from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Prior to returning to graduate school, she worked as a Professional School Counselor in Tennessee and Florida. Her current research interests include strengthening workforce development for school counselors, such as recruiting and retaining diverse students in graduate preparation programs and developing role-specific training for school counselors serving on school threat assessment teams. Her hobbies include being in nature and collecting cool rocks, spending time with friends and family, and being the most fun aunt to all of her nieces and nephews.</p> </aug> <nolink nlid="nl1" bibid="bib53" firstref="ref1"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl2" bibid="bib36" firstref="ref2"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl3" bibid="bib13" firstref="ref3"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl4" bibid="bib17" firstref="ref4"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl5" bibid="bib45" firstref="ref7"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl6" bibid="bib40" firstref="ref9"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl7" bibid="bib43" firstref="ref10"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl8" bibid="bib52" firstref="ref11"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl9" bibid="bib18" firstref="ref13"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl10" bibid="bib50" firstref="ref14"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl11" bibid="bib31" firstref="ref19"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl12" bibid="bib27" firstref="ref20"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl13" bibid="bib41" firstref="ref21"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl14" bibid="bib37" firstref="ref22"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl15" bibid="bib19" firstref="ref23"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl16" bibid="bib55" firstref="ref24"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl17" bibid="bib49" firstref="ref25"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl18" bibid="bib39" firstref="ref26"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl19" bibid="bib11" firstref="ref27"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl20" bibid="bib46" firstref="ref28"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl21" bibid="bib47" firstref="ref29"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl22" bibid="bib26" firstref="ref30"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl23" bibid="bib56" firstref="ref31"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl24" bibid="bib32" firstref="ref32"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl25" bibid="bib15" firstref="ref33"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl26" bibid="bib38" firstref="ref34"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl27" bibid="bib30" firstref="ref38"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl28" bibid="bib34" firstref="ref40"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl29" bibid="bib14" firstref="ref41"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl30" bibid="bib51" firstref="ref44"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl31" bibid="bib33" firstref="ref45"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl32" bibid="bib10" firstref="ref50"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl33" bibid="bib16" firstref="ref51"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl34" bibid="bib20" firstref="ref52"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl35" bibid="bib35" firstref="ref53"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl36" bibid="bib21" firstref="ref54"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl37" bibid="bib12" firstref="ref55"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl38" bibid="bib24" firstref="ref64"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl39" bibid="bib22" firstref="ref67"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl40" bibid="bib44" firstref="ref68"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl41" bibid="bib54" firstref="ref73"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl42" bibid="bib42" firstref="ref75"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl43" bibid="bib25" firstref="ref76"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl44" bibid="bib28" firstref="ref77"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl45" bibid="bib29" firstref="ref78"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl46" bibid="bib23" firstref="ref82"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl47" bibid="bib112" firstref="ref84"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl48" bibid="bib73" firstref="ref85"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl49" bibid="bib67" firstref="ref95"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl50" bibid="bib48" firstref="ref107"></nolink>
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1508593
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Impacts of a STEM-Focused Summer Camp on Postsecondary Aspirations for Rural Appalachian High School Students
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haley+R%2E+Ault%22">Haley R. Ault</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2400-5936">0000-0002-2400-5936</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Katherine+D%2E+Cook%22">Katherine D. Cook</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Melinda+M%2E+Gibbons%22">Melinda M. Gibbons</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7080-0690">0000-0002-7080-0690</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Erin+E%2E+Hardin%22">Erin E. Hardin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-1068">0000-0003-4058-1068</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brittney+Carneal%22">Brittney Carneal</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Career+Development%22"><i>Journal of Career Development</i></searchLink>. 2026 53(4):474-493.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DHHS)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R25GM129177
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Summer+Programs%22">Summer Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Camps%22">Camps</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiential+Learning%22">Experiential Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mentors%22">Mentors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Career+Exploration%22">Career Exploration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Attendance%22">College Attendance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+Interests%22">Vocational Interests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tennessee%22">Tennessee</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/08948453261453002
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0894-8453<br />1556-0856
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Out-of-school experiences are important opportunities for career and educational development, especially for underserved students. This study explored the experiences of rural Appalachian high school students who attended a STEM-based summer camp and the impacts on their college and STEM attitudes and beliefs. Grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994), the camp provided hands-on learning experiences, mentorship, and career exploration opportunities with the goal of increasing students' college-going self-efficacy, science identity, and STEM career interest. Findings indicate that students who attended the summer program experienced an immediate increase in self-efficacy and science identity following the summer camp, as well as a positive increase in STEM career interest over time compared to a matched sample of non-participants. These results highlight the potential of out-of-school STEM programming to support college and career development and extend the longer-term impact of STEM interventions.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1508593
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1508593
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/08948453261453002
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 474
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Student Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: STEM Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Summer Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Camps
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experiential Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mentors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Career Exploration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Attendance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Concept
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vocational Interests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tennessee
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Impacts of a STEM-Focused Summer Camp on Postsecondary Aspirations for Rural Appalachian High School Students
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Haley R. Ault
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Katherine D. Cook
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Melinda M. Gibbons
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Erin E. Hardin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brittney Carneal
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0894-8453
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1556-0856
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Career Development
              Type: main
ResultId 1