The Use of First Year as an Academically Diagnostic Year: A Re-examination

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Use of First Year as an Academically Diagnostic Year: A Re-examination
Authors: Otto, E. P.
Source: Vestes. 77 20(1-2):24-28.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 5
Publication Date: 1977
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Articulation (Education), College Freshmen, College Students, Higher Education, Performance, Probationary Period, Sex Differences, Statistical Analysis, Student College Relationship, Student Evaluation
Geographic Terms: Australia
Abstract: Current policies that require students in some departments to perform to a certain standard before they can continue with their course appear to be justified on empirical grounds and seem to apply equally well to college student populations. Male and female students should be evaluated separately, suggests the author. (LBH)
Entry Date: 1978
Accession Number: EJ164570
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ164570
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ164570
AccessLevel: 3
PubTypeId: unknown
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Use of First Year as an Academically Diagnostic Year: A Re-examination
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Otto%2C+E%2E+P%2E%22">Otto, E. P.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Vestes%22"><i>Vestes</i></searchLink>. 77 20(1-2):24-28.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 5
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1977
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Articulation+%28Education%29%22">Articulation (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Freshmen%22">College Freshmen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance%22">Performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probationary+Period%22">Probationary Period</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+Differences%22">Sex Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+College+Relationship%22">Student College Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Current policies that require students in some departments to perform to a certain standard before they can continue with their course appear to be justified on empirical grounds and seem to apply equally well to college student populations. Male and female students should be evaluated separately, suggests the author. (LBH)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1978
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ164570
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ164570
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 24
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Articulation (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Freshmen
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Performance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probationary Period
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student College Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Use of First Year as an Academically Diagnostic Year: A Re-examination
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Otto, E. P.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1977
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 20
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1-2
ResultId 1