Intactness and Accuracy of Online and Card Catalogs: ALIS II vs. Card Catalog at Texas A&M University.
Saved in:
| Title: | Intactness and Accuracy of Online and Card Catalogs: ALIS II vs. Card Catalog at Texas A&M University. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cook, Colleen, Payne, Leila |
| Source: | Information Technology and Libraries. Sep 1991 10(3):163-171. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 9 |
| Publication Date: | 1991 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Bibliographic Records, Card Catalogs, College Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Library Research, Online Catalogs, Research Needs |
| ISSN: | 0730-9295 |
| Abstract: | A study was conducted at Texas A&M University that compared the intactness (i.e., the presence or absence of a bibliographic record) and the accuracy of the bibliographic data in the public card catalog and in the online catalog (ALIS II). Results indicate the online catalog was less intact, but more accurate. (two references) (LRW) |
| Entry Date: | 1992 |
| Accession Number: | EJ433273 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | A study was conducted at Texas A&M University that compared the intactness (i.e., the presence or absence of a bibliographic record) and the accuracy of the bibliographic data in the public card catalog and in the online catalog (ALIS II). Results indicate the online catalog was less intact, but more accurate. (two references) (LRW) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0730-9295 |
