Comparing the Validity of Automated and Human Scoring of Essays.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing the Validity of Automated and Human Scoring of Essays. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Powers, Donald E., Burstein, Jill C., Chodorow, Martin S. |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2002 26(4):407-425. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2002 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Computer Uses in Education, Cost Effectiveness, Graduate Study, Intermode Differences, Performance Based Assessment, Scoring, Student Evaluation, Validity, Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills |
| ISSN: | 0735-6331 |
| Abstract: | Discusses the validity of automated, or computer-based, scoring for improving the cost effectiveness of performance assessments and describes a study that examined the relationship of scores from a graduate level writing assessment to several independent, non-test indicators of examinee's writing skills, both for automated scores and for scores assigned by trained human readers. (Author/LRW) |
| Journal Code: | CIJAPR2003 |
| Entry Date: | 2003 |
| Accession Number: | EJ657882 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Discusses the validity of automated, or computer-based, scoring for improving the cost effectiveness of performance assessments and describes a study that examined the relationship of scores from a graduate level writing assessment to several independent, non-test indicators of examinee's writing skills, both for automated scores and for scores assigned by trained human readers. (Author/LRW) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0735-6331 |
