A Microscope or a Mirror?: A Question of Study Validity Regarding the Use of Dissertation Citation Analysis for Evaluating Research Collections

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Microscope or a Mirror?: A Question of Study Validity Regarding the Use of Dissertation Citation Analysis for Evaluating Research Collections
Language: English
Authors: Beile, Penny M., Boote, David N., Killingsworth, Elizabeth K.
Source: Journal of Academic Librarianship. Sep 2004 30(5):347-353.
Availability: Elsevier Customer Service Department, 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126 (Toll Free); Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 7
Publication Date: 2004
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, Periodicals
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.001
ISSN: 0099-1333
Abstract: Use of dissertation citation analysis for collection evaluation was investigated. Analysis of 1842 education dissertation citations from three institutions suggests the assumption of doctoral student expertise in their use of the scholarly literature may be overstated. For purposes of developing research collections, dependence on dissertation citation analyses should proceed cautiously.
Abstractor: Author
Entry Date: 2005
Accession Number: EJ697414
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Use of dissertation citation analysis for collection evaluation was investigated. Analysis of 1842 education dissertation citations from three institutions suggests the assumption of doctoral student expertise in their use of the scholarly literature may be overstated. For purposes of developing research collections, dependence on dissertation citation analyses should proceed cautiously.
ISSN:0099-1333
DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.001