A Preliminary Analysis of Adaptive Responding Under Open and Closed Economies

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Preliminary Analysis of Adaptive Responding Under Open and Closed Economies
Language: English
Authors: Roane, Henry S., Call, Nathan A., Falcomata, Terry S.
Source: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Fall 2005 38(3):335-335.
Availability: Department of Applied Behavioral Science, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., KU, Lawrence, KS 66045-2133. Web site: http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2005
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Positive Reinforcement, Developmental Disabilities, Economic Factors, Behavior Modification, Patterned Responses, Psychological Patterns
ISSN: 0021-8855
Abstract: In the current investigation, we evaluated the effects of open and closed economies on the adaptive behavior of 2 individuals with developmental disabilities. Across both types of economy, progressive-ratio (PR) schedules were used in which the number of responses required to obtain reinforcement increased as the session progressed. In closed-economy sessions, participants were able to obtain reinforcement only through interaction with the PR schedule requirements (i.e., more work resulted in more reinforcer access). In open-economy sessions, participants obtained reinforcers by responding on the PR schedule and were given supplemental (free) access to the reinforcers after completion of the session. In general, more responding was associated with the closed economy.
Abstractor: Author
Entry Date: 2006
Access URL: https://www.jeabjaba.org/jaba/toc/2005/jabaFall05.php
Accession Number: EJ725225
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:In the current investigation, we evaluated the effects of open and closed economies on the adaptive behavior of 2 individuals with developmental disabilities. Across both types of economy, progressive-ratio (PR) schedules were used in which the number of responses required to obtain reinforcement increased as the session progressed. In closed-economy sessions, participants were able to obtain reinforcement only through interaction with the PR schedule requirements (i.e., more work resulted in more reinforcer access). In open-economy sessions, participants obtained reinforcers by responding on the PR schedule and were given supplemental (free) access to the reinforcers after completion of the session. In general, more responding was associated with the closed economy.
ISSN:0021-8855