A Prospective Test of Cognitive Vulnerability Models of Depression with Adolescent Girls

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Prospective Test of Cognitive Vulnerability Models of Depression with Adolescent Girls
Language: English
Authors: Bohon, Cara, Stice, Eric, Burton, Emily
Source: Behavior Therapy. Mar 2008 39(1):79-90.
Availability: Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2008
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Substance Abuse, Females, Eating Disorders, Depression (Psychology), Symptoms (Individual Disorders), Adolescents, At Risk Persons, Longitudinal Studies, Stress Variables, Predictor Variables, Negative Attitudes, Self Esteem
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.003
ISSN: 0005-7894
Abstract: This study sought to provide a more rigorous prospective test of two cognitive vulnerability models of depression with longitudinal data from 496 adolescent girls. Results supported the cognitive vulnerability model in that stressors predicted future increases in depressive symptoms and onset of clinically significant major depression for individuals with a negative attributional style, but not for those with a positive attributional style, although these effects were small. This model appeared to be specific to depression, in that it did not predict future increases in bulimia nervosa or substance abuse symptoms. In contrast, results did not support the integrated cognitive vulnerability self-esteem model that asserts stressors should only predict increased depression for individuals with a confluence of negative attributional style and low self-esteem, and this model did not appear to be specific to depression.
Abstractor: Author
Entry Date: 2008
Accession Number: EJ796897
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study sought to provide a more rigorous prospective test of two cognitive vulnerability models of depression with longitudinal data from 496 adolescent girls. Results supported the cognitive vulnerability model in that stressors predicted future increases in depressive symptoms and onset of clinically significant major depression for individuals with a negative attributional style, but not for those with a positive attributional style, although these effects were small. This model appeared to be specific to depression, in that it did not predict future increases in bulimia nervosa or substance abuse symptoms. In contrast, results did not support the integrated cognitive vulnerability self-esteem model that asserts stressors should only predict increased depression for individuals with a confluence of negative attributional style and low self-esteem, and this model did not appear to be specific to depression.
ISSN:0005-7894
DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.003