Postsecondary Disability Service Providers' Perceptions about Implementing Universal Design for Instruction (UDI)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Postsecondary Disability Service Providers' Perceptions about Implementing Universal Design for Instruction (UDI)
Language: English
Authors: Embry, Priscilla B., Parker, David R., McGuire, Joan M., Scott, Sally S.
Source: Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. Win 2005 18(1):34-48.
Availability: Association on Higher Education and Disability. 107 Commerce Center Drive Suite 204, Huntersville, NC 28078. Tel: 704-947-7779; Fax: 704-948-7779; e-mail: ahead@ahead.org; Website: http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2005
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Disabilities, Colleges, College Students, Access to Education, Student Diversity, Student Personnel Services, Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Role, Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty
Geographic Terms: Connecticut
Abstract: Sixteen disability service providers from 2-year and 4-year public and private postsecondary institutions were divided into 2 focus groups, each with 8 participants. When asked to share their perspectives on the implementation of Universal Design for Instruction (UDI) on their campus, service providers described strengths and weaknesses of UDI, potential changes to their current roles and responsibilities, and support structures they would need to promote the adoption of UDI on their campuses. Participants' comments reflected detailed knowledge about successful change agentry at the institutional level.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 33
Entry Date: 2009
Access URL: https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped/winter-2005#4
Accession Number: EJ846379
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Sixteen disability service providers from 2-year and 4-year public and private postsecondary institutions were divided into 2 focus groups, each with 8 participants. When asked to share their perspectives on the implementation of Universal Design for Instruction (UDI) on their campus, service providers described strengths and weaknesses of UDI, potential changes to their current roles and responsibilities, and support structures they would need to promote the adoption of UDI on their campuses. Participants' comments reflected detailed knowledge about successful change agentry at the institutional level.