Labor's Poor Form
Saved in:
| Title: | Labor's Poor Form |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Burchell, David |
| Source: | Australian Universities' Review. 2004 47(1):3-4. |
| Availability: | National Tertiary Education Union. PO Box 1323, South Melbourne 3205, Australia. Tel: +61-3-92541910; Fax: +61-3-92541915; e-mail: editor@aur.org.au; Web site: http://www.aur.org.au |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 2 |
| Publication Date: | 2004 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Opinion Papers |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Labor, Higher Education, Governance, Foreign Countries, Social Problems |
| ISSN: | 0818-8068 |
| Abstract: | In recent years university governance has come in from the cold, so to speak, and is now the subject of some debate in political and academic venues. The core issue for debate is the appropriateness and effectiveness of current university governance structures. This debate is particularly critical in light of the increased professionalisation of universities and university administrators; and, the increased extension of university activities beyond teaching and research to other more complex, often hybrid, activities which may carry with them new legal and commercial risks. A starting point has to be a clarification of what is meant by "university governance". As a legal matter, governance is not just a question of how one structures the governing board of an institution. That may seem like stating the obvious but most proposals for reform of governance, corporate or university, focus principally on the responsibilities of board members and ignore very important structural and institutional issues. Governance, in fact refers first of all to the legal allocation of decision making power within a university between various governance structures (such as faculties, academic boards, senates and councils) and administrative or "management" structures (such as departments, divisions, pro-Vice-Chancellors, deputies and Vice-Chancellors). It is an ecosystem with interdependent parts. Secondly, governance also refers to the allocation of both responsibility and accountability for the exercise of that decision making power. The legal validity of corporate acts will often depend on whether principles of corporate governance have been observed. Australian universities like to adopt private-sector practices when it suits them. But they often remain perilously vague about the legal implications of doing so. In this article, the author examines the uncertain legal status of the prevailing governance culture and presents as an example the case of the University of Adelaide. Putting to one side any suggestion that Australian universities should have a uniform Act, the author suggests a few possible changes to current university governance practice which could improve the ability of university governing boards to fulfil their legal and institutional duties. (Contains 29 endnotes.) |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2009 |
| Accession Number: | EJ848180 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ848180 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ848180 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Labor's Poor Form – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burchell%2C+David%22">Burchell, David</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Australian+Universities'+Review%22"><i>Australian Universities' Review</i></searchLink>. 2004 47(1):3-4. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Tertiary Education Union. PO Box 1323, South Melbourne 3205, Australia. Tel: +61-3-92541910; Fax: +61-3-92541915; e-mail: editor@aur.org.au; Web site: http://www.aur.org.au – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 2 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2004 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Opinion Papers – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor%22">Labor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Governance%22">Governance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Problems%22">Social Problems</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0818-8068 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In recent years university governance has come in from the cold, so to speak, and is now the subject of some debate in political and academic venues. The core issue for debate is the appropriateness and effectiveness of current university governance structures. This debate is particularly critical in light of the increased professionalisation of universities and university administrators; and, the increased extension of university activities beyond teaching and research to other more complex, often hybrid, activities which may carry with them new legal and commercial risks. A starting point has to be a clarification of what is meant by "university governance". As a legal matter, governance is not just a question of how one structures the governing board of an institution. That may seem like stating the obvious but most proposals for reform of governance, corporate or university, focus principally on the responsibilities of board members and ignore very important structural and institutional issues. Governance, in fact refers first of all to the legal allocation of decision making power within a university between various governance structures (such as faculties, academic boards, senates and councils) and administrative or "management" structures (such as departments, divisions, pro-Vice-Chancellors, deputies and Vice-Chancellors). It is an ecosystem with interdependent parts. Secondly, governance also refers to the allocation of both responsibility and accountability for the exercise of that decision making power. The legal validity of corporate acts will often depend on whether principles of corporate governance have been observed. Australian universities like to adopt private-sector practices when it suits them. But they often remain perilously vague about the legal implications of doing so. In this article, the author examines the uncertain legal status of the prevailing governance culture and presents as an example the case of the University of Adelaide. Putting to one side any suggestion that Australian universities should have a uniform Act, the author suggests a few possible changes to current university governance practice which could improve the ability of university governing boards to fulfil their legal and institutional duties. (Contains 29 endnotes.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ848180 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ848180 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 2 StartPage: 3 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Labor Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Governance Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Problems Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Labor's Poor Form Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burchell, David IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2004 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0818-8068 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 47 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Australian Universities' Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
