New Zealand = Maori, New Zealand = Bicultural: Ethnic Group Differences in a National Sample of Maori and Europeans

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: New Zealand = Maori, New Zealand = Bicultural: Ethnic Group Differences in a National Sample of Maori and Europeans
Language: English
Authors: Harding, Jessica F., Sibley, Chris G., Robertson, Andrew
Source: Social Indicators Research. Jan 2011 100(1):137-148.
Availability: Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2011
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cultural Differences, Whites, Social Indicators, Social Theories, Sociometric Techniques, Comparative Analysis, Sociocultural Patterns, Attitude Measures, Pacific Islanders, Ethnic Groups, Biculturalism, Cultural Influences
Geographic Terms: New Zealand
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9608-5
ISSN: 0303-8300
Abstract: New Zealand (NZ) Europeans show a unique implicit bicultural effect, with research using the Implicit Association Test consistently showing that they associate Maori (the Indigenous peoples) and their own (dominant/advantaged majority) group as equally representative of the nation. We replicated and extended this NZ = bicultural effect in a small online national sample of Maori and NZ Europeans. The NZ European majority showed a consistent NZ = bicultural effect. Maori, in contrast, showed an automatic ingroup NZ = Maori effect. These results are contrary to predictions derived from Social Identity Theory and System Justification Theory, and instead seem more consistent with a model incorporating the pervasive effects of culture-specific symbols on automatic representations of the national category.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 24
Entry Date: 2010
Accession Number: EJ907414
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:New Zealand (NZ) Europeans show a unique implicit bicultural effect, with research using the Implicit Association Test consistently showing that they associate Maori (the Indigenous peoples) and their own (dominant/advantaged majority) group as equally representative of the nation. We replicated and extended this NZ = bicultural effect in a small online national sample of Maori and NZ Europeans. The NZ European majority showed a consistent NZ = bicultural effect. Maori, in contrast, showed an automatic ingroup NZ = Maori effect. These results are contrary to predictions derived from Social Identity Theory and System Justification Theory, and instead seem more consistent with a model incorporating the pervasive effects of culture-specific symbols on automatic representations of the national category.
ISSN:0303-8300
DOI:10.1007/s11205-010-9608-5