The Role of Status in Producing Depressed Entitlement in Women's and Men's Pay Allocations

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Role of Status in Producing Depressed Entitlement in Women's and Men's Pay Allocations
Language: English
Authors: Hogue, Mary, Yoder, Janice D.
Source: Psychology of Women Quarterly. Dec 2003 27(4):330-337.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2003
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Credentials, Undergraduate Students, Gender Differences, Salary Wage Differentials, Control Groups, Status, Role
DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.00113
ISSN: 0361-6843
Abstract: Extensive empirical evidence confirms a depressed entitlement effect wherein women pay themselves less than men for comparable work and believe the allocation fair. The present study tests the hypothesis that status subordination linked to being female underlies at least some of this effect. A 2 x 3 design crossed 180 undergraduates' gender with a control condition, which successfully established the depressed entitlement effect, and two experimental conditions. In one, women's status was enhanced through legitimation of women's task abilities; in the other, both women's and men's status was enhanced by adding educational credentials relevant to task ability. Follow-up analyses of the significant interaction revealed that the gap in self-pay demonstrated in the control condition disappeared when women's status was enhanced such that higher-status women's self-pay equaled that of men and exceeded that of control women. Although these findings confirm that status plays a role in producing depressed entitlement in self-pay, ancillary analyses of participants' perceptions point to the persistence of shifting standards and men's resistance to status threats. (Contains 1 figure.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 36
Entry Date: 2011
Accession Number: EJ914833
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Extensive empirical evidence confirms a depressed entitlement effect wherein women pay themselves less than men for comparable work and believe the allocation fair. The present study tests the hypothesis that status subordination linked to being female underlies at least some of this effect. A 2 x 3 design crossed 180 undergraduates' gender with a control condition, which successfully established the depressed entitlement effect, and two experimental conditions. In one, women's status was enhanced through legitimation of women's task abilities; in the other, both women's and men's status was enhanced by adding educational credentials relevant to task ability. Follow-up analyses of the significant interaction revealed that the gap in self-pay demonstrated in the control condition disappeared when women's status was enhanced such that higher-status women's self-pay equaled that of men and exceeded that of control women. Although these findings confirm that status plays a role in producing depressed entitlement in self-pay, ancillary analyses of participants' perceptions point to the persistence of shifting standards and men's resistance to status threats. (Contains 1 figure.)
ISSN:0361-6843
DOI:10.1111/1471-6402.00113