IRT-Stimulus Contingencies in Chained Schedules: Implications for the Concept of Conditioned Reinforcement
Saved in:
| Title: | IRT-Stimulus Contingencies in Chained Schedules: Implications for the Concept of Conditioned Reinforcement |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Bejarano, Rafael, Hackenberg, Timothy D. |
| Source: | Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Sep 2007 88(2):215-227. |
| Availability: | Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Available from: Indiana University Department of Psychology. Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 812-334-0395; Fax: 812-855-4691; e-mail: jeab@indiana.edu; Web site: http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/index.html |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2007 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Animals, Reaction Time, Stimuli, Change, Contingency Management, Probability, Reinforcement, Conditioning |
| ISSN: | 0022-5002 |
| Abstract: | Two experiments with pigeons investigated the effects of contingencies between interresponse times (IRTs) and the transitions between the components of 2- and 4-component chained schedules (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). The probability of component transitions varied directly with the most recent (Lag 0) IRT in some experimental conditions and with the 4th (Lag 4) IRT preceding the most recent one in others. Mean component durations were constant across conditions, so the reinforcing effect of stimulus change was dissociated from that of delay to food. IRTs were longer in the Lag-0 than in the Lag-4 conditions of both experiments, thus demonstrating that stimulus change functioned as a reinforcer. In the Lag-0 conditions of Experiment 2, the Component-1 IRTs increased more than the Component-2 IRTs, which in turn increased more than the Component-3 IRTs. This finding runs counter to the conditioned-positive-reinforcement account of chained-schedule responding, which holds that the reinforcing effect of stimulus change should vary in strength as an inverse function of the delay to the unconditioned reinforcer at the end of the chain because conditioned reinforcement is due to first- or higher- order classical conditioning. Therefore, we present other possible explanations for this effect. (Contains 6 figures and 2 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 22 |
| Entry Date: | 2013 |
| Access URL: | https://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/toc/2007/jeabSep07.php |
| Accession Number: | EJ991548 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ991548 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: IRT-Stimulus Contingencies in Chained Schedules: Implications for the Concept of Conditioned Reinforcement – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bejarano%2C+Rafael%22">Bejarano, Rafael</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hackenberg%2C+Timothy+D%2E%22">Hackenberg, Timothy D.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+the+Experimental+Analysis+of+Behavior%22"><i>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</i></searchLink>. Sep 2007 88(2):215-227. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Available from: Indiana University Department of Psychology. Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 812-334-0395; Fax: 812-855-4691; e-mail: jeab@indiana.edu; Web site: http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/index.html – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2007 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animals%22">Animals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reaction+Time%22">Reaction Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stimuli%22">Stimuli</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change%22">Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Contingency+Management%22">Contingency Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability%22">Probability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reinforcement%22">Reinforcement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conditioning%22">Conditioning</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0022-5002 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Two experiments with pigeons investigated the effects of contingencies between interresponse times (IRTs) and the transitions between the components of 2- and 4-component chained schedules (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). The probability of component transitions varied directly with the most recent (Lag 0) IRT in some experimental conditions and with the 4th (Lag 4) IRT preceding the most recent one in others. Mean component durations were constant across conditions, so the reinforcing effect of stimulus change was dissociated from that of delay to food. IRTs were longer in the Lag-0 than in the Lag-4 conditions of both experiments, thus demonstrating that stimulus change functioned as a reinforcer. In the Lag-0 conditions of Experiment 2, the Component-1 IRTs increased more than the Component-2 IRTs, which in turn increased more than the Component-3 IRTs. This finding runs counter to the conditioned-positive-reinforcement account of chained-schedule responding, which holds that the reinforcing effect of stimulus change should vary in strength as an inverse function of the delay to the unconditioned reinforcer at the end of the chain because conditioned reinforcement is due to first- or higher- order classical conditioning. Therefore, we present other possible explanations for this effect. (Contains 6 figures and 2 tables.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 22 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2013 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/toc/2007/jeabSep07.php" linkWindow="_blank">http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/toc/2007/jeabSep07.php</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ991548 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ991548 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 215 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Animals Type: general – SubjectFull: Reaction Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Stimuli Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Contingency Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability Type: general – SubjectFull: Reinforcement Type: general – SubjectFull: Conditioning Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: IRT-Stimulus Contingencies in Chained Schedules: Implications for the Concept of Conditioned Reinforcement Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bejarano, Rafael – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hackenberg, Timothy D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2007 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0022-5002 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 88 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |