The Effects of Delayed Reinforcement on Variability and Repetition of Response Sequences
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effects of Delayed Reinforcement on Variability and Repetition of Response Sequences |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Odum, Amy L., Ward, Ryan D., Burke, K. Anne |
| Source: | Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Sep 2006 86(2):159-179. |
| Availability: | Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Available from: Indiana University Department of Psychology. Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 812-334-0395; Fax: 812-855-4691; e-mail: jeab@indiana.edu; Web site: http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/index.html |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2006 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Reinforcement, Animal Behavior, Animals, Behavioral Science Research, Food, Delay of Gratification, Contingency Management |
| DOI: | 10.1901/jeab.2006.58-05 |
| ISSN: | 0022-5002 |
| Abstract: | Four experiments examined the effects of delays to reinforcement on key peck sequences of pigeons maintained under multiple schedules of contingencies that produced variable or repetitive behavior. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4, in the repeat component only the sequence right-right-left-left earned food, and in the vary component four-response sequences different from the previous 10 earned food. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effects of nonresetting and resetting delays to reinforcement, respectively. In Experiment 3, in the repeat component sequences had to be the same as one of the previous three, whereas in the vary component sequences had to be different from each of the previous three for food. Experiment 4 compared postreinforcer delays to prereinforcement delays. With immediate reinforcement sequences occurred at a similar rate in the two components, but were less variable in the repeat component. Delays to reinforcement decreased the rate of sequences similarly in both components, but affected variability differently. Variability increased in the repeat component, but was unaffected in the vary component. These effects occurred regardless of the manner in which the delay to reinforcement was programmed or the contingency used to generate repetitive behavior. Furthermore, the effects were unique to prereinforcement delays. (Contains 5 tables and 8 figures.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 42 |
| Entry Date: | 2013 |
| Accession Number: | EJ992099 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ992099 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Effects of Delayed Reinforcement on Variability and Repetition of Response Sequences – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Odum%2C+Amy+L%2E%22">Odum, Amy L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ward%2C+Ryan+D%2E%22">Ward, Ryan D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+K%2E+Anne%22">Burke, K. Anne</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+the+Experimental+Analysis+of+Behavior%22"><i>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</i></searchLink>. Sep 2006 86(2):159-179. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Available from: Indiana University Department of Psychology. Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 812-334-0395; Fax: 812-855-4691; e-mail: jeab@indiana.edu; Web site: http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jeab/index.html – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2006 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reinforcement%22">Reinforcement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animal+Behavior%22">Animal Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animals%22">Animals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavioral+Science+Research%22">Behavioral Science Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food%22">Food</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delay+of+Gratification%22">Delay of Gratification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Contingency+Management%22">Contingency Management</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1901/jeab.2006.58-05 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0022-5002 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Four experiments examined the effects of delays to reinforcement on key peck sequences of pigeons maintained under multiple schedules of contingencies that produced variable or repetitive behavior. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4, in the repeat component only the sequence right-right-left-left earned food, and in the vary component four-response sequences different from the previous 10 earned food. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effects of nonresetting and resetting delays to reinforcement, respectively. In Experiment 3, in the repeat component sequences had to be the same as one of the previous three, whereas in the vary component sequences had to be different from each of the previous three for food. Experiment 4 compared postreinforcer delays to prereinforcement delays. With immediate reinforcement sequences occurred at a similar rate in the two components, but were less variable in the repeat component. Delays to reinforcement decreased the rate of sequences similarly in both components, but affected variability differently. Variability increased in the repeat component, but was unaffected in the vary component. These effects occurred regardless of the manner in which the delay to reinforcement was programmed or the contingency used to generate repetitive behavior. Furthermore, the effects were unique to prereinforcement delays. (Contains 5 tables and 8 figures.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 42 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2013 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ992099 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ992099 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1901/jeab.2006.58-05 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 159 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Reinforcement Type: general – SubjectFull: Animal Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Animals Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavioral Science Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Food Type: general – SubjectFull: Delay of Gratification Type: general – SubjectFull: Contingency Management Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Effects of Delayed Reinforcement on Variability and Repetition of Response Sequences Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Odum, Amy L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ward, Ryan D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burke, K. Anne IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2006 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0022-5002 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 86 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |