Agreement between Therapists, Parents, Patients, and Independent Evaluators on Clinical Improvement in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Saved in:
| Title: | Agreement between Therapists, Parents, Patients, and Independent Evaluators on Clinical Improvement in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lewin, Adam B., Peris, Tara S., De Nadai, Alessandro S. |
| Source: | Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Dec 2012 80(6):1103-1107. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 5 |
| Publication Date: | 2012 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Evidence, Anxiety Disorders, Psychotherapy, Males, Patients, Evaluators, Outcomes of Treatment, Parent Attitudes, Clinical Diagnosis, Pediatrics, Models, Counselor Attitudes, Measures (Individuals) |
| DOI: | 10.1037/a0029991 |
| ISSN: | 0022-006X |
| Abstract: | Objective: Independent evaluators (IE) are used widely in clinical trials to make unbiased determinations of treatment response. By virtue of being kept blind to treatment condition, however, IEs are also kept unaware of many pertinent clinical details that are relevant for decisions about clinical improvement. In this study, agreement among raters (children, parents, therapists, and IEs) about treatment response over the course of a 14-week clinical trial for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) was examined in order to determine the utility of nonblind clinician and patient ratings of treatment response. Method: Participants were 71 youth (mean age = 12.2 years; 63.4% female) with a primary diagnosis of OCD and their parents participating in a psychotherapy trial. IEs provided response ratings (Clinician's Global Impressions-Improvement Scale; CGI-I) at Weeks 4, 8, and 14, and therapists, children, and parents completed independent CGI-I ratings at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 14. Results: Nonlinear mixed models revealed differences in rating parties, with therapists and IEs slower to rate treatment improvement compared with children and parents, and growth curve models suggested that therapists and IEs produced generally consistent ratings. In addition, no evidence was found for an Evaluator x Treatment interaction, indicating that raters displayed these differences consistently across both active and placebo conditions. Conclusions: Youth and parents may be able to provide accurate ratings of global improvement; nonblinded treating clinicians (with training in research-oriented assessment) can offer global improvement ratings commensurate with blinded IEs. Findings suggest that alternatives (or additions) to the blinded-IE model may be appropriate for assessing global improvement, especially with the growing emphasis on dissemination and effectiveness trials. (Contains 1 table and 1 figure.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 22 |
| Entry Date: | 2013 |
| Accession Number: | EJ992807 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ992807 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Agreement between Therapists, Parents, Patients, and Independent Evaluators on Clinical Improvement in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lewin%2C+Adam+B%2E%22">Lewin, Adam B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peris%2C+Tara+S%2E%22">Peris, Tara S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22De+Nadai%2C+Alessandro+S%2E%22">De Nadai, Alessandro S.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Consulting+and+Clinical+Psychology%22"><i>Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology</i></searchLink>. Dec 2012 80(6):1103-1107. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 5 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2012 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anxiety+Disorders%22">Anxiety Disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychotherapy%22">Psychotherapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Males%22">Males</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients%22">Patients</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluators%22">Evaluators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Treatment%22">Outcomes of Treatment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+Attitudes%22">Parent Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+Diagnosis%22">Clinical Diagnosis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pediatrics%22">Pediatrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Counselor+Attitudes%22">Counselor Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measures+%28Individuals%29%22">Measures (Individuals)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/a0029991 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0022-006X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: Independent evaluators (IE) are used widely in clinical trials to make unbiased determinations of treatment response. By virtue of being kept blind to treatment condition, however, IEs are also kept unaware of many pertinent clinical details that are relevant for decisions about clinical improvement. In this study, agreement among raters (children, parents, therapists, and IEs) about treatment response over the course of a 14-week clinical trial for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) was examined in order to determine the utility of nonblind clinician and patient ratings of treatment response. Method: Participants were 71 youth (mean age = 12.2 years; 63.4% female) with a primary diagnosis of OCD and their parents participating in a psychotherapy trial. IEs provided response ratings (Clinician's Global Impressions-Improvement Scale; CGI-I) at Weeks 4, 8, and 14, and therapists, children, and parents completed independent CGI-I ratings at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 14. Results: Nonlinear mixed models revealed differences in rating parties, with therapists and IEs slower to rate treatment improvement compared with children and parents, and growth curve models suggested that therapists and IEs produced generally consistent ratings. In addition, no evidence was found for an Evaluator x Treatment interaction, indicating that raters displayed these differences consistently across both active and placebo conditions. Conclusions: Youth and parents may be able to provide accurate ratings of global improvement; nonblinded treating clinicians (with training in research-oriented assessment) can offer global improvement ratings commensurate with blinded IEs. Findings suggest that alternatives (or additions) to the blinded-IE model may be appropriate for assessing global improvement, especially with the growing emphasis on dissemination and effectiveness trials. (Contains 1 table and 1 figure.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 22 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2013 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ992807 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ992807 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/a0029991 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 5 StartPage: 1103 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Evidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Anxiety Disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychotherapy Type: general – SubjectFull: Males Type: general – SubjectFull: Patients Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluators Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Treatment Type: general – SubjectFull: Parent Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical Diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Pediatrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Counselor Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Measures (Individuals) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Agreement between Therapists, Parents, Patients, and Independent Evaluators on Clinical Improvement in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lewin, Adam B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Peris, Tara S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: De Nadai, Alessandro S. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0022-006X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 80 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |