View in EDS PDF Full Text

Indicadores de riesgo del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo como instrumento para la detección temprana de retrasos y alteraciones del desarrollo.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Indicadores de riesgo del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo como instrumento para la detección temprana de retrasos y alteraciones del desarrollo.
Alternate Title: Indicators of the profile of developmental behaviors for the early detection of developmental delays and deviations in the development.
Authors: Bolaños, Cristina1, Mina-Lara, María del Mar1, Ramos-Ortega, Gregorio1
Source: Acta Pediatrica de Mexico. may-jun2015, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p135-146. 12p. 6 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subjects: CHILD development testing, CHILD development, DEVELOPMENTAL delay, CHILD development research, RISK -- Mathematical models, EARLY diagnosis
Abstract (English): Objective: To assess the discriminant validity of Risk Indicators of the Revised Development Behavior Profile (INDIPCD-R) as screening tool for the early detection of developmental alterations and delays in children aged 6 months to 4 years. Methods: Comparative cross-sectional study with a sample of 145 children, which included children attending a clinic and two day-care centers (CENDI). Of the total, 83 children were evaluated with INDIPCDR and the Revised Behavior Profile Developmental Scale (PCD-R), while the rest were evaluated only with INDIPCD-R. A descriptive analysis of frequencies of the variables of the study, U de Mann-Whitney to compare INDIPCD-R in the clinic and CENDI. Sensibility and Specificity for the INDIPCD-R. Internal consistency of the INDIPCD-R with the Cronbach's Alpha. Results: Significant differences were found in the frequencies of risk indicators (p < 0.05) in the two groups studied. In the group of children from the clinic, sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 69%. In the group from the CENDI, sensitivity: 94%; specificity: 84%. Cronbach's Alpha: 0.938. Conclusion: INDIPCD-R is a screening tool that discriminates children with delays and deviations in their development from those whose development is normal and not at risk. It was demonstrated in a valid and reliable way that children who apparently have a normal development, without specific diagnosis, may present developmental alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivo: evaluar la validez de la discriminación de los Indicadores de Riesgo del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo-Revisados (INDIPCD-R), como instrumento de tamizado, para la detección temprana de retrasos y alteraciones del desarrollo en infantes de 6 meses a 4 años de edad. Materiales y métodos: estudio transversal comparativo con 145 infantes provenientes de una clínica y dos estancias infantiles (CENDI). Se evaluaron con INDIPCD-R y con la Escala Perfil de Conductas del Desarrollo-Revisada 83 niños, el resto fue evaluado sólo con los INDIPCD-R. Análisis: frecuencias para variables de estudio. U de Mann- Whitney para comparar INDIPCD-R en clínica y CENDI. Sensibilidad y especificidad para el INDIPCD-R. Consistencia interna del INDIPCD-R mediante alfa de Cronbach. Resultados: se encontraron diferencias significativas (p < 0.05) en las frecuencias de indicadores de riesgo en los grupos evaluados. Grupo de niños de clínica: sensibilidad 100%; especificidad 69%. Grupo de niños de los CENDI: sensibilidad 94%; especificidad 84%. Alfa de Cronbach: 0.938. Conclusiones: los Indicadores de Riesgo del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo-Revisados son un instrumento de tamizado que discrimina al niño que presenta alteraciones en su desarrollo de aquéllos cuyo desarrollo es normal y no se encuentran en riesgo. Se demostró de forma válida y confiable que niños con aparente desarrollo normal, sin diagnóstico específico, pueden presentar alteraciones en el desarrollo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Pediatrica de Mexico is the property of Instituto Nacional de Pediatria (INP) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:Objective: To assess the discriminant validity of Risk Indicators of the Revised Development Behavior Profile (INDIPCD-R) as screening tool for the early detection of developmental alterations and delays in children aged 6 months to 4 years. Methods: Comparative cross-sectional study with a sample of 145 children, which included children attending a clinic and two day-care centers (CENDI). Of the total, 83 children were evaluated with INDIPCDR and the Revised Behavior Profile Developmental Scale (PCD-R), while the rest were evaluated only with INDIPCD-R. A descriptive analysis of frequencies of the variables of the study, U de Mann-Whitney to compare INDIPCD-R in the clinic and CENDI. Sensibility and Specificity for the INDIPCD-R. Internal consistency of the INDIPCD-R with the Cronbach's Alpha. Results: Significant differences were found in the frequencies of risk indicators (p < 0.05) in the two groups studied. In the group of children from the clinic, sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 69%. In the group from the CENDI, sensitivity: 94%; specificity: 84%. Cronbach's Alpha: 0.938. Conclusion: INDIPCD-R is a screening tool that discriminates children with delays and deviations in their development from those whose development is normal and not at risk. It was demonstrated in a valid and reliable way that children who apparently have a normal development, without specific diagnosis, may present developmental alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01862391