Lex artis y dispraxis implicaciones bioéticas y ética biojurídica. Un problema para la práctica odontológica.
Saved in:
| Title: | Lex artis y dispraxis implicaciones bioéticas y ética biojurídica. Un problema para la práctica odontológica. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Lex artis and dyspraxis bioethical implications and biojury ethics. A problem for dental practice. Lex artis e dispraxis: implicações bioéticas e ética biojurídica. Um problema para a prática odontológica. |
| Authors: | Carlos Araujo-Cuauro, Juan1 j.araujo@sed.luz.edu.ve |
| Source: | Revista Nacional de Odontología. 2020, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1-22. 22p. |
| Abstract (English): | Introduction: The lex artis dentistry is the accumulation of precepts and rules to properly treat patients. While dyspraxis refers to malpractice due to incompetence ranging from lack of skill and / or experience, as well as the imprudence or negligence that a dentist can commit in his professional practice. Objective: It is to determine the association between the lex artis dyspraxics in the ethical-deontological-legal framework of the dental practice in the Venezuelan health system and its bioethical implications and biolegal ethics in its relation to professional responsibility. Materials and methods: It is a descriptive, cross-sectional investigation with an intentional sample of 100 dentists through an anonymous, standardized survey with a randomly chosen sample. Results: in the response of the survey based on the articles of the Code of Dental Ethics, more than 80% of the dentists surveyed were unaware of the content of articles 8,10 and 11 which leads to their transgression. On the other hand, 60% violates the principles of good reciprocity and fellowship in their professional practice stipulated in article 41 and 42. Finally, 70% incurs the practice that transgresses article 81 of the comment code. Conclusion: In the professional academic training of the dentist it is necessary to strengthen precepts based on bioethical principles to exercise a dental lex artis that does not incur dyspraxical practice that generates legal ethics implications in the practice of dentistry focused on professional responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Introducción: La lex artis odontológica es el cúmulo de preceptos y reglas para tratar adecuadamente a los pacientes, mientras que la dispraxis hace referencia a la mala práctica por incompetencia, que va desde la falta de habilidad o experiencia, así como la imprudencia o la negligencia que puede cometer un odontólogo en su ejercicio profesional. Objetivo: determinar la asociación entre la lex artis dispraxicas en el marco ético-deontológico-jurídico de la práctica odontológica en el sistema de salud venezolano y sus implicaciones bioéticas y ética biojurídica relacionada con la responsabilidad profesional. Materiales y métodos: investigación descriptiva transversal con una muestra intencionada aleatoria de 100 odontólogos a través una encuesta anónima estandarizada. Resultados: en la respuesta de la encuesta basada en los artículos del Código de Deontología Odontológica, más del 80% de los odontólogos encuestados desconocían lo contentivo en los artículos 8, 10 y 11 lo que propicia su transgresión. Por otra parte, el 60% transgrede los principios de buena reciprocidad y confraternidad en su ejercicio profesional estipulado en el artículo 41 y 42. Por último el 70% incurre en la práctica que transgrede el artículo 81 del mencionado código. Conclusión: en la formación académica profesional del odontólogo es necesario fortalecer preceptos basados en los principios bioéticos para ejercer una lex artis odontológica que no incurra en la práctica dispraxica que genere implicaciones éticas jurídicas en el ejercicio de la odontología enfocada en la responsabilidad profesional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Introdução: a lex artis odontológica é o conjunto de princípios e regras para tratar adequadamente os pacientes, enquanto a dispraxis se refere à má prática por incompetência, que vai da falta de habilidade ou experiência, bem como a imprudência ou a negligência que um odontologista pode cometer em seu exercício profissional. Objetivo: determinar a associação entre a lex artis dispráxicas no âmbito ético-deontológico-jurídico da prática odontológica no sistema de saúde venezuelano e suas implicações bioéticas e ética biojurídica relacionadas com a responsabilidade profissional. Materiais e métodos: pesquisa descritiva transversal com amostra intencional aleatória de 100 odontologistas por meio de um questionário padronizado anônimo. Resultados: na resposta do questionário baseada nos artigos do Código de Deontologia Odontológica, mais de 80% dos odontologistas entrevistados desconheciam o conteúdo dos artigos 8°, 10 e 11, o que propicia sua transgressão. Por sua vez, 60% transgride os princípios de boa reciprocidade e confraternidade em seu exercício profissional estipulado nos artigos 41 e 42. Por último, 70% incorrem na prática que transgride o artigo 81 do mencionado código. Conclusão: na formação acadêmico-profissional do odontólogo é necessário fortalecer princípios baseados nos princípios bioéticos para exercer uma lex artis odontológica que não incorra na prática dispráxica que gere implicações éticas jurídicas no exercício da odontologia focada na responsabilidade profissional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Revista Nacional de Odontología is the property of Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| Abstract: | Introduction: The lex artis dentistry is the accumulation of precepts and rules to properly treat patients. While dyspraxis refers to malpractice due to incompetence ranging from lack of skill and / or experience, as well as the imprudence or negligence that a dentist can commit in his professional practice. Objective: It is to determine the association between the lex artis dyspraxics in the ethical-deontological-legal framework of the dental practice in the Venezuelan health system and its bioethical implications and biolegal ethics in its relation to professional responsibility. Materials and methods: It is a descriptive, cross-sectional investigation with an intentional sample of 100 dentists through an anonymous, standardized survey with a randomly chosen sample. Results: in the response of the survey based on the articles of the Code of Dental Ethics, more than 80% of the dentists surveyed were unaware of the content of articles 8,10 and 11 which leads to their transgression. On the other hand, 60% violates the principles of good reciprocity and fellowship in their professional practice stipulated in article 41 and 42. Finally, 70% incurs the practice that transgresses article 81 of the comment code. Conclusion: In the professional academic training of the dentist it is necessary to strengthen precepts based on bioethical principles to exercise a dental lex artis that does not incur dyspraxical practice that generates legal ethics implications in the practice of dentistry focused on professional responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 19003080 |
| DOI: | 10.16925/2357-4607.2020.01.05 |
