DIAGNOSTICO CLINICO DE LA DEMENCIA SEMANTICA Y LA AFASIA PROGRESIVA PRIMARIA VARIANTE SEMÁNTICA: UNA REVISION SISTEMÁTICA.
Saved in:
| Title: | DIAGNOSTICO CLINICO DE LA DEMENCIA SEMANTICA Y LA AFASIA PROGRESIVA PRIMARIA VARIANTE SEMÁNTICA: UNA REVISION SISTEMÁTICA. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Clinical diagnosis of semantic dementia and primary progressive aphasia semantic variant: a systematic review. Diagnóstico clínico de demência semântica e variante semântica de afasia progressiva primária: uma revisão sistemática. |
| Authors: | Baby, Raquel Talavera1, García, Florentina Morello1,2,3 flor.morellog@gmail.com, Ferreres, Aldo1,3 |
| Source: | Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology / Cuadernos de Neuropsicología. may-ago2022, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p103-119. 17p. |
| Abstract (English): | Background: Semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is a syndrome characterized by severe anomia and single word comprehension impairments. Its similarity to semantic dementia (SD) has been controversial. Some evidence suggests that both diagnoses correspond to the same pathological spectrum characterized by severe verbal and nonverbal semantic deficits. Goal: Analyze the SD and svPPA clinical diagnostic criteria in order to define whether both syndromes belong to the same diagnostic entity according to the literature. Method: a systematic review was performed in PubMed, Ebsco and Science Direct of articles published between 1998 and 2020 that proposed new criteria for SD and/or PPPvs or that contributed something new to the classification. Results: the results were 607 records and a final corpus of 12 papers. 3 of them propose new diagnostic criteria and 9 add new data to the current ones. Conclusions: The main controversy between the diagnostic criteria of SD and svPPA surrounds the possible presence of associative agnosia or prosopagnosia and the consideration of behavioral impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Introducción: la afasia progresiva primaria variante semántica (APPvs) se caracteriza por anomia severa y déficit en la comprensión de palabras aisladas. Su similitud con la demencia semántica (DS) ha sido controversial. Cierta evidencia sugiere que corresponden a un mismo espectro patológico caracterizado por severas dificultades semánticas tanto verbales como no verbales. Objetivo: analizar los criterios diagnósticos clínicos de la DS y la APPvs para delimitar si ambos síndromes pertenecen a una misma entidad diagnóstica de acuerdo con la literatura. Método: se realizó una revisión sistemática en PubMed, Ebsco y Science Direct de artículos publicados entre 1998 y 2020 que propusieran criterios nuevos de DS y/o APPvs o que aportaran algo novedoso a la clasificación. Resultados: se obtuvieron un total de 607 registros y un corpus final de 12 artículos. 3 de ellos proponen criterios diagnósticos nuevos y 9 aportan novedades a los criterios vigentes. Conclusiones: Las principales controversias entre los criterios diagnósticos de DS y APPvs radican en torno a la posible presencia de agnosia asociativa y/o prosopagnosia y a la consideración de alteraciones conductuales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Introdução: a afasia progressiva primária variante semântica (APPvs) é uma síndrome caracterizada por anomia grave e déficit na compreensão de palavras isoladas. Sua semelhança com a demência semântica (DS) tem sido controversa. Algumas evidências sugerem que correspondem ao mesmo espectro patológico caracterizado por graves dificuldades semânticas, tanto verbais quanto não verbais. Objetivo: analisar os critérios diagnósticos clínicos de DS e APPvs para definir se ambas as síndromes pertencem à mesma entidade diagnóstica de acordo com a literatura. Método: foi realizada revisão sistemática no PubMed, Ebsco e Science Direct de artigos publicados entre 1998 e 2020 que propuseram novos critérios para DS e/ou APPvs ou que contribuíram com algo novo para a classificação. Resultados: obteve-se um total de 607 registros e um corpus final de 12 artigos. 3 deles propõem novos critérios diagnósticos e 9 trazem novidades aos critérios atuais. Conclusões: As principais controvérsias entre os critérios diagnósticos para DS e APPvs residem na possível presença de agnosia associativa e/ou prosopagnosia e na consideração de alterações comportamentais. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology / Cuadernos de Neuropsicología is the property of Cuadernos de Neuropsicologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| Abstract: | Background: Semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is a syndrome characterized by severe anomia and single word comprehension impairments. Its similarity to semantic dementia (SD) has been controversial. Some evidence suggests that both diagnoses correspond to the same pathological spectrum characterized by severe verbal and nonverbal semantic deficits. Goal: Analyze the SD and svPPA clinical diagnostic criteria in order to define whether both syndromes belong to the same diagnostic entity according to the literature. Method: a systematic review was performed in PubMed, Ebsco and Science Direct of articles published between 1998 and 2020 that proposed new criteria for SD and/or PPPvs or that contributed something new to the classification. Results: the results were 607 records and a final corpus of 12 papers. 3 of them propose new diagnostic criteria and 9 add new data to the current ones. Conclusions: The main controversy between the diagnostic criteria of SD and svPPA surrounds the possible presence of associative agnosia or prosopagnosia and the consideration of behavioral impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 07184123 |
| DOI: | 10.7714/CNPS/16.2.206 |
