Comparative effectiveness of Yoga and Pilates intervention on respiratory function of patients with breast cancer.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparative effectiveness of Yoga and Pilates intervention on respiratory function of patients with breast cancer. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Efectividad de la intervención de Yoga vs Pilates en la función respiratoria de pacientes con cáncer de mama. Eficácia comparativa da intervenção de Yoga e Pilates na função respiratória de pacientes com câncer de mama. |
| Authors: | Odynets, T.1 tatyana01121985@gmail.com, Briskin, Y.2, Leshchii, N.3, Tyshchenko, V.4, Ikkert, O.5, Yefremova, A.6 |
| Source: | Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte. dic2022, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p132-137. 6p. |
| Subjects: | BREAST cancer, CANCER patients, YOGA, EXPIRATORY flow, VITAL capacity (Respiration) |
| Abstract (English): | Objective: Most modern breast cancer treatments are shown to be effective in terms of survival but lead to side effects such as dysfunction of the upper limb, lymphedema, pain syndrome, plexitis, ardiotoxicity, fatigue, and pulmonary complications. Applied radiotherapy enhances 'ardiotoxicity, fatigue, and pulmonary complications. Applied radiotherapy enhances the number of side the number of side effects that patients with breast cancer experience over a long period. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of Hatha Yoga and Pilates interventions on respiratory function in patients with breast cancer. Methods: 95 women completed the interventions and were included in the final analysis. The participants, staged I-II, were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group A (n = 48, 57.53 ± 1.92 years) received Hatha Yoga intervention and group B (n = 47, 58.00 ± 1.27 years) received Pilates intervention. Both programs were conducted for 12 weeks, with three 60-min sessions per week. Spirometry was used to measure pre- and post-intervention functional capacity of the respiratory system. Results: Significant differences (p<0.05) were found in Vital Capacity, Forced Vital Capacity, Peak Expiratory Flow, Maximum Expiratory Flow25, Expiratory Reserve Volume and Maximal Voluntary Ventilation in Hatha Yoga group compared with Pilates group. There was no significant difference between both groups in Force Expiratory Volume and Maximum Expiratory Flow50 (p>0,05). Conclusions: Hatha Yoga and Pilates interventions are both effective in respiratory function, but Hatha Yoga turns out more beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Objetivo: La mayoría de los tratamientos modernos contra el cáncer de mama han demostrado ser efectivos en términos de supervivencia, pero provocan efectos secundarios como disfunción del miembro superior, linfedema, síndrome de dolor, plexitis, cardiotoxicidad, fatiga y complicaciones pulmonares. La radioterapia aplicada aumenta la cantidad de efectos secundarios que experimentan los pacientes con cáncer de mama durante un período prolongado. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la efectividad de las intervenciones de Hatha Yoga y Pilates sobre la función respiratoria en pacientes con cáncer de mama. Métodos: 95 mujeres completaron las intervenciones y fueron incluidas en el análisis final. Los participantes, estadios I-II, fueron asignados aleatoriamente a 2 grupos. El grupo A (n = 48, 57.53 ± 1.92 años) recibió intervención de Hatha Yoga y el grupo B (n = 47, 58.00 ± 1.27 años) recibió intervención de Pilates. Ambos programas se realizaron durante 12 semanas, con tres sesiones de 60 min por semana. La espirometría se utilizó para medir la capacidad funcional del sistema respiratorio antes y después de la intervención. Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p<0.05) en Capacidad Vital, Capacidad Vital Forzada, Flujo Espiratorio Pico, Flujo Espiratorio Máximo25, Volumen de Reserva Espiratorio y Ventilación Voluntaria Máxima en el grupo de Hatha Yoga comparado con el grupo de Pilates. No hubo diferencia significativa entre ambos grupos en Volumen Espiratorio Forzado y Flujo Espiratorio Máximo50 (p>0.05). Conclusiones: Las intervenciones de Hatha Yoga y Pilates son efectivas en la función respiratoria, pero Hatha Yoga resulta más beneficiosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Objetivo: A maioria dos tratamentos modernos de câncer de mama se mostram eficazes em termos de sobrevida, mas levam a efeitos colaterais como disfunção do membro superior, linfedema, síndrome da dor, plexite, cardiotoxicidade, fadiga e complicações pulmonares. A radioterapia aplicada aumenta o número de efeitos colaterais que as pacientes com câncer de mama experimentam por um longo período. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia das intervenções Hatha Yoga e Pilates na função respiratória em pacientes com câncer de mama. Métodos: 95 mulheres completaram as intervenções e foram incluídas na análise final. Os participantes, estágio I-II, foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em 2 grupos. O grupo A (n = 48, 57.53 ± 1.92 anos) recebeu intervenção de Hatha Yoga e o grupo B (n = 47, 58.00 ± 1.27 anos) recebeu intervenção de Pilates. Ambos os programas foram realizados durante 12 semanas, com três sessões de 60 minutos por semana. A espirometria foi utilizada para medir a capacidade funcional pré e pós-intervenção do sistema respiratório. Resultados: Foram encontradas diferenças significativas (p<0.05) na Capacidade Vital, Capacidade Vital Forçada, Pico de Fluxo Expiratório, Fluxo Expiratório Máximo25, Volume Expiratório de Reserva e Ventilação Voluntária Máxima no grupo Hatha Yoga comparado ao grupo Pilates. Não houve diferença significativa entre os dois grupos no Volume Expiratório de Força e Fluxo Expiratório Máximo50 (p>0.05). Conclusões: As intervenções de Hatha Yoga e Pilates são eficazes na função respiratória, mas Hatha Yoga se mostra mais benéfica. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte is the property of Centro Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| Abstract: | Objective: Most modern breast cancer treatments are shown to be effective in terms of survival but lead to side effects such as dysfunction of the upper limb, lymphedema, pain syndrome, plexitis, ardiotoxicity, fatigue, and pulmonary complications. Applied radiotherapy enhances 'ardiotoxicity, fatigue, and pulmonary complications. Applied radiotherapy enhances the number of side the number of side effects that patients with breast cancer experience over a long period. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of Hatha Yoga and Pilates interventions on respiratory function in patients with breast cancer. Methods: 95 women completed the interventions and were included in the final analysis. The participants, staged I-II, were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group A (n = 48, 57.53 ± 1.92 years) received Hatha Yoga intervention and group B (n = 47, 58.00 ± 1.27 years) received Pilates intervention. Both programs were conducted for 12 weeks, with three 60-min sessions per week. Spirometry was used to measure pre- and post-intervention functional capacity of the respiratory system. Results: Significant differences (p<0.05) were found in Vital Capacity, Forced Vital Capacity, Peak Expiratory Flow, Maximum Expiratory Flow25, Expiratory Reserve Volume and Maximal Voluntary Ventilation in Hatha Yoga group compared with Pilates group. There was no significant difference between both groups in Force Expiratory Volume and Maximum Expiratory Flow50 (p>0,05). Conclusions: Hatha Yoga and Pilates interventions are both effective in respiratory function, but Hatha Yoga turns out more beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 18887546 |
| DOI: | 10.33155/j.ramd.2022.08.004 |
