Perfiles de los programas posgraduales de periodoncia de seis universidades. Análisis documental comparativo.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Perfiles de los programas posgraduales de periodoncia de seis universidades. Análisis documental comparativo.
Alternate Title: Profiles of postgraduate periodontics programs at six universities. Comparative documentary analysis.
Authors: Restrepo Pérez, Ana María1 anarestrepoperez@hotmail.com, Restrepo Echeverri, Laura1 laura_lu38@hotmail.com, Ángel Palacio, María Paulina1 angelpauli2000@yahoo.com, Martínez Delgado, Cecilia María2 cmariamar@hotmail.com
Source: Revista Kiru. abr-jun2024, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p47-60. 14p.
Subjects: STUDENT mobility, PUBLIC institutions, COMPARATIVE method, GRADUATE education, PERIODONTICS
Abstract (English): Objectives: To compare the information provided by the websites of several Colombian and foreign universities, in reference to their strategic platform on training, professional and occupational profiles of the clinical specialist in periodontics. Materials and Methods: Comparative documentary research by intentionally reviewing the websites among six universities, three at a national level (Colombia): CES University, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ), also private institutions and one public institution: National University of Colombia (UN). At an international level, universities recognized by different rankings and that had periodontics programs as postgraduate training: University of Chile, University of Sao Paulo, and University of Michigan in Ann Arbor; the information was condensed into a matrix with pre-structured and emerging categories. Results: All institutions declare institution's mission and a program mission; some of them do not declare the three profiles consulted. Regarding the mission of the periodontics programs, two national universities and one international university do not report it. When the training objectives are required, the documentation refers to the object of study and the fields of intervention. The areas of knowledge are clear, however, the techniques, methods and procedures during training are poorly informed. The competency category is the least enunciate. Conclusions: Comparative research allows the interested parties to be informed on little-explored topics, with the aim of establishing similarities or differences and relationships that could guide international academic mobility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivos: Comparar la información suministrada por las páginas web de varias universidades colombianas y extranjeras, en referencia a su plataforma estratégica sobre los perfiles de formación, profesional y ocupacional del especialista clínico en periodoncia. Materiales y métodos: Investigación documental comparativa, mediante la revisión de las páginas web de seis universidades de manera intencionada, tres del nivel nacional (Colombia): Universidad CES, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ), instituciones de orden privado y una de carácter público: Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UN). A nivel internacional se escogieron universidades reconocidas por los diferentes rankings y que tuviesen programas de periodoncia como formación posgradual: Universidad de Chile, Universidad de Sao Paulo y Universidad de Michigan en Ann Arbor; la información se condensó en una matriz con categorías preestructuradas y emergentes. Resultados: Todas las instituciones estudiadas declaran misión institucional y del programa; algunas de ellas no declaran los tres perfiles consultados. En cuanto a la misión de los programas de periodoncia, dos universidades nacionales y una internacional no la informan; cuando se indaga por los objetivos de formación, la documentación se refiere al objeto de estudio y a los campos de intervención. Las áreas de conocimiento son claras, sin embargo, las técnicas, métodos y procedimientos durante la formación, poco informadas. La categoría de competencias es la menos enunciada. Conclusiones: La investigación comparativa permite ofrecer información a los interesados sobre tópicos poco explorados, con la finalidad de establecer semejanzas o diferencias y relaciones que pudiesen orientar la movilidad académica internacional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Kiru is the property of Universidad de San Martin de Porres and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:Objectives: To compare the information provided by the websites of several Colombian and foreign universities, in reference to their strategic platform on training, professional and occupational profiles of the clinical specialist in periodontics. Materials and Methods: Comparative documentary research by intentionally reviewing the websites among six universities, three at a national level (Colombia): CES University, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ), also private institutions and one public institution: National University of Colombia (UN). At an international level, universities recognized by different rankings and that had periodontics programs as postgraduate training: University of Chile, University of Sao Paulo, and University of Michigan in Ann Arbor; the information was condensed into a matrix with pre-structured and emerging categories. Results: All institutions declare institution's mission and a program mission; some of them do not declare the three profiles consulted. Regarding the mission of the periodontics programs, two national universities and one international university do not report it. When the training objectives are required, the documentation refers to the object of study and the fields of intervention. The areas of knowledge are clear, however, the techniques, methods and procedures during training are poorly informed. The competency category is the least enunciate. Conclusions: Comparative research allows the interested parties to be informed on little-explored topics, with the aim of establishing similarities or differences and relationships that could guide international academic mobility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:18127886
DOI:10.24265/kiru.2024.v21n2.02