¿De dónde proviene este manuscrito? Sesgos geoeconómicos en la publicación científica global.
Saved in:
| Title: | ¿De dónde proviene este manuscrito? Sesgos geoeconómicos en la publicación científica global. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | De Vito, Eduardo L.1,2 (AUTHOR) eldevito@gmail.com, Estenssoro, Elisa3,4 (AUTHOR) estenssoro.elisa@gmail.com |
| Source: | Medicina (Buenos Aires). jul/ago2025, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p889-890. 2p. |
| Subjects: | LOW-income countries, MIDDLE-income countries, SCIENCE publishing, SELECTION bias (Statistics), SCHOLARLY publishing, REGIONAL disparities |
| Abstract (English): | The article addresses the implicit editorial barriers that affect the scientific visibility of manuscripts from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in global medicine. It documents geoeconomic biases that discourage the publication of research from these regions, despite its quality being comparable to that of more developed countries. Among the manifestations of this bias are the presumption of quality based on the institution of origin, non-native writing style, and the perception that certain studies are "local" and therefore irrelevant. It concludes that there is a need to review editorial practices and diversify review committees to ensure equitable representation and truly global medicine. [Extracted from the article] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | El artículo aborda las barreras editoriales implícitas que afectan la visibilidad científica de manuscritos provenientes de países de ingresos bajos y medianos (LMICs) en la medicina global. Se documentan sesgos geoeconómicos que desincentivan la publicación de investigaciones de estas regiones, a pesar de su calidad comparable a la de países más desarrollados. Entre las manifestaciones de este sesgo se encuentran la presunción de calidad basada en la institución de origen, el estilo de redacción no nativo y la percepción de que ciertos estudios son "locales" y, por lo tanto, irrelevantes. Se concluye que es necesario revisar las prácticas editoriales y diversificar los comités de revisión para garantizar una representación equitativa y una medicina verdaderamente global. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The article addresses the implicit editorial barriers that affect the scientific visibility of manuscripts from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in global medicine. It documents geoeconomic biases that discourage the publication of research from these regions, despite its quality being comparable to that of more developed countries. Among the manifestations of this bias are the presumption of quality based on the institution of origin, non-native writing style, and the perception that certain studies are "local" and therefore irrelevant. It concludes that there is a need to review editorial practices and diversify review committees to ensure equitable representation and truly global medicine. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00257680 |
