Evaluation of the bond strength of different intraradicular posts in endodontically treated teeth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of the bond strength of different intraradicular posts in endodontically treated teeth.
Alternate Title: Evaluación de la fuerza de unión de diferentes postes intrarradiculares en dientes tratados endodónticamente.
Authors: Dias Caldeira, François Isnaldo1,2 fraqncoisdias@hotmail.com, Luvisoto Belotto, Guilherme Vieira2 gvl.belotto@unesp.br, Maia Athadeu, Arthur Francia3 dr.arthur.francia@gmail.com, de Souza Moreira Machado, Barbara Maria3 barbara_mmsouza@hotmail.com, de Oliveira Capote, Ticiana Sidorenko1 ticiana.capote@unesp.br, Gustavo Paleari, André4 andre.paleari@unifal-mg.edu.br, Santana Rodriguez, Larissa3 dralarissarodriguez@gmail.com
Source: Revista Kiru. oct-dic2025, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p272-278. 7p.
Subjects: BOND strengths, ENDODONTICS, ROOT canal treatment, DENTAL cements
Abstract (English): Objectives: The reconstruction of endodontically treated teeth with significant coronal destruction often requires the use of posts. This study evaluated the bond strength of four intraradicular post systems in different root regions using a push-out test: conventional fiberglass, CAD/CAM fiberglass, Splendor SAP, and anatomical posts. Materials and Methods: Nineteen single-rooted premolars were treated endodontically and divided into four groups. The posts were cemented with dual self-adhesive resin cement and then sectioned into 1 mm slices for push-out testing. Results: The cervical region had a higher bond strength than middle and apical thirds. Conventional fiberglass posts presented higher resistance than anatomical posts (p=0.048). Conclusions: These results confirm that cervical thirds present the best bonding conditions and that conventional fiberglass posts outperform the anatomical ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivos: La reconstrucción de dientes endodónticos con destrucción coronal significativa a menudo requiere el uso de postes. Este estudio evaluó la resistencia de adhesión de cuatro sistemas de postes intrarradiculares en diferentes regiones radiculares mediante una prueba de expulsión: fibra de vidrio convencional, fibra de vidrio CAD/CAM, Splendor SAP y postes anatómicos. Materiales y Métodos: Diecinueve premolares unirradiculares fueron endodónticamente tratados y divididos en cuatro grupos. Los postes se cementaron con cemento de resina autoadhesivo dual y luego se seccionaron en rebanadas de 1 mm para la prueba de expulsión. Resultados: La región cervical tuvo una mayor resistencia de adhesión que los tercios medio y apical. Los postes convencionales de fibra de vidrio presentaron mayor resistencia que los postes anatómicos (p=0,048). Conclusiones: Estos resultados confirman que los tercios cervicales presentan las mejores condiciones de adhesión y que los postes convencionales de fibra de vidrio superan a los anatómicos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Kiru is the property of Universidad de San Martin de Porres and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:Objectives: The reconstruction of endodontically treated teeth with significant coronal destruction often requires the use of posts. This study evaluated the bond strength of four intraradicular post systems in different root regions using a push-out test: conventional fiberglass, CAD/CAM fiberglass, Splendor SAP, and anatomical posts. Materials and Methods: Nineteen single-rooted premolars were treated endodontically and divided into four groups. The posts were cemented with dual self-adhesive resin cement and then sectioned into 1 mm slices for push-out testing. Results: The cervical region had a higher bond strength than middle and apical thirds. Conventional fiberglass posts presented higher resistance than anatomical posts (p=0.048). Conclusions: These results confirm that cervical thirds present the best bonding conditions and that conventional fiberglass posts outperform the anatomical ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:18127886
DOI:10.24265/kiru.2025.v22n4.02