Personalized weight improvement of 3D-printed testicular prostheses using polypropylene.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Personalized weight improvement of 3D-printed testicular prostheses using polypropylene.
Alternate Title: Mejora del peso personalizada en prótesis testiculares impresas en 3D con polipropileno.
Authors: Liu, Chuanfeng1 (AUTHOR), Meng, Qian2 (AUTHOR), Wang, Weikang2 (AUTHOR), Chen, Di2 (AUTHOR), Cao, Shouxia2 (AUTHOR), Xia, Yongqiang1 (AUTHOR), Guan, Haifang2 (AUTHOR) guanhaifang123@outlook.com
Source: Cirugía y Cirujanos. jan/feb2026, Vol. 94 Issue 1, p58-64. 7p.
Subjects: POLYPROPYLENE, PROSTHESIS design & construction, MEDICAL equipment, MATERIALS science, THREE-dimensional printing, CLINICAL medicine, BIOMEDICAL engineering, TESTIS
Abstract (English): Objective: To develop personalized 3D-printed testicular prostheses using polypropylene (PP) that closely mimic natural testicles in size, shape, and particularly weight. Method: Clinical data from two testicular resection patients were analyzed. Reference testicular density (0.99 g/mL) was derived from three specimens (mean weight: 6.67 g, volume: 6.70 mL). Target prostheses (volume: 16.75 cm³, weight: 16.58 g) were modeled through magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scans using SolidWorks/Mimics and printed with PP filament on a Bambu X1-Carbon printer. Comparative experiments with polylactic acid (PLA) included power analysis (Pass21 software) to determine a sample size of 14 (seven per group). Weight and density were compared using independent and single-sample t-tests, respectively. Results: Out of five printing trials, three yielded successful PP prostheses with optimized parameters, whereas two failed due to inadequate supports or material overflow. Among the two groups, PP prostheses exhibited a mean weight of 15.41 ± 1.53 g (vs. target: 16.58 g), whereas PLA prostheses were significantly heavier (19.95 ± 0.93 g, p < 0.001). PP density (0.98 ± 0.01 g/mL) closely matched reference testicles (p = 0.062), whereas PLA density (1.23 ± 0.01 g/mL) deviated significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: 3D printing with PP could enable the creation of personalized testicular prostheses that meet clinical needs for size, shape, and particularly weight, potentially improving patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivo: Desarrollar prótesis testiculares 3D en polipropileno (PP) personalizadas que repliquen los testículos naturales en tamaño, forma y peso. Método: Analizamos datos de dos pacientes con resección testicular. La densidad testicular (0.99 g/ml) se calculó usando tres especímenes (peso medio: 6.67 g). Las prótesis objetivo (volumen 16.75 cm³, peso 16.58 g) se modelaron mediante RM/TC con Solidworks/Mimics y se imprimieron con PP en una Bambu X1-Carbon. Los experimentos con ácido poliláctico (PLA) incluyeron análisis de potencia (Pass21) con 14 muestras (7 por grupo). El peso y la densidad se compararon mediante pruebas t independientes y de una muestra. Resultados: Tres de cinco intentos produjeron prótesis de PP exitosas, mientras que dos fallaron por soportes inadecuados. Las prótesis de PP tuvieron un peso de 15.41 ± 1.53 g (vs. 16.58 g objetivo), significativamente menor que las de PLA (19.95 ± 0.93 g; p < 0.001). La densidad del PP (0.98 ± 0.01 g/ml) fue comparable a la de los testículos naturales (p = 0.062), mientras que las de PLA (1.23 ± 0.01 g/ml) mostraron una desviación significativa (p < 0.001). Conclusiones: El PP permite fabricar prótesis testiculares 3D que cumplen los requisitos clínicos de tamaño, forma y peso, mejorando potencialmente la satisfacción del paciente. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cirugía y Cirujanos is the property of Publicidad Permanyer SLU and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:Objective: To develop personalized 3D-printed testicular prostheses using polypropylene (PP) that closely mimic natural testicles in size, shape, and particularly weight. Method: Clinical data from two testicular resection patients were analyzed. Reference testicular density (0.99 g/mL) was derived from three specimens (mean weight: 6.67 g, volume: 6.70 mL). Target prostheses (volume: 16.75 cm³, weight: 16.58 g) were modeled through magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scans using SolidWorks/Mimics and printed with PP filament on a Bambu X1-Carbon printer. Comparative experiments with polylactic acid (PLA) included power analysis (Pass21 software) to determine a sample size of 14 (seven per group). Weight and density were compared using independent and single-sample t-tests, respectively. Results: Out of five printing trials, three yielded successful PP prostheses with optimized parameters, whereas two failed due to inadequate supports or material overflow. Among the two groups, PP prostheses exhibited a mean weight of 15.41 ± 1.53 g (vs. target: 16.58 g), whereas PLA prostheses were significantly heavier (19.95 ± 0.93 g, p < 0.001). PP density (0.98 ± 0.01 g/mL) closely matched reference testicles (p = 0.062), whereas PLA density (1.23 ± 0.01 g/mL) deviated significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: 3D printing with PP could enable the creation of personalized testicular prostheses that meet clinical needs for size, shape, and particularly weight, potentially improving patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00097411
DOI:10.24875/CIRU.24000587