El "buen autor".

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: El "buen autor".
Alternate Title: The "good author".
Authors: Chávez-Martínez, Omar1 omar.chavezm@imss.gob.mx
Source: Revista Medica del IMSS. mar/abr2026, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p1-4. 4p.
Subjects: AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH integrity, RELIABILITY (Personality trait), RESEARCH evaluation, EDITORIAL policies
Abstract (English): This article examines the notion of the "good author" within systems of scientific evaluation, defining it through observable practices: the relevance of research questions, methodological adequacy, and transparency throughout the manuscript-writing process. It emphasizes accountability in collaboration, properly justified authorship--free of honorary practices--and editorial and regulatory integrity. In addition, by analogy with journal indexing, it proposes an "index of responsible authorship" grounded in verifiable indicators and multidimensional profiles, rather than in prestige or impact. It concludes by underscoring the tension between authorship as social accountability and authorship as evaluative performance, arguing that the central challenge is cultural and institutional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Este artículo analiza la noción de "buen autor" en la evaluación científica, definiéndola mediante prácticas observables: pertinencia de preguntas, adecuación metodológica y transparencia en el proceso de redacción de un manuscrito. Se destaca la responsabilidad en la colaboración, autorías justificadas, sin prácticas honorarias y la integridad editorial y normativa. Asimismo, se propone, por analogía con la indización de revistas, un "índice de autoría responsable" basado en indicadores verificables y perfiles por dimensiones, no en prestigio o impacto. Concluye subrayando la tensión entre autoría como rendición de cuentas social y autoría como rendimiento evaluativo, y se plantea que el reto principal es cultural e institucional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Medica del IMSS is the property of Direccion de Prestaciones Medicas - IMSS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:This article examines the notion of the "good author" within systems of scientific evaluation, defining it through observable practices: the relevance of research questions, methodological adequacy, and transparency throughout the manuscript-writing process. It emphasizes accountability in collaboration, properly justified authorship--free of honorary practices--and editorial and regulatory integrity. In addition, by analogy with journal indexing, it proposes an "index of responsible authorship" grounded in verifiable indicators and multidimensional profiles, rather than in prestige or impact. It concludes by underscoring the tension between authorship as social accountability and authorship as evaluative performance, arguing that the central challenge is cultural and institutional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:04435117
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.17544049