Acute myocardial infarction type 2 without ST elevation following administration of butylbromide hyoscine.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Acute myocardial infarction type 2 without ST elevation following administration of butylbromide hyoscine.
Alternate Title: Infarto Agudo de Miocardio Tipo 2 sin Elevación del ST tras administración de butilbromuro de hioscina: reporte de caso.
Infarto agudo do miocárdio tipo 2 sem elevação do ST após administração de brometo de butil-hioscina: relato de caso.
Authors: Nossa Ávila, Samuel Eduardo1, Franco González, Sebastián2, Gómez Muñoz, Karen Daniela3, Camargo Salas, Carlos Fernando4 cfcs05@hotmail.com
Source: Archivos de Medicina (1657-320X). ene-jun2026, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1-7. 7p.
Subjects: Non-ST elevated myocardial infarction, Antispasmodics, Hemodynamics, Atrial fibrillation, Coronary angiography, Myocardial infarction, Major adverse cardiovascular events, Chest pain
Abstract (English): We report the case of a woman in her eighth decade who developed atrial fibrillation and a type 2 non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (type 2 NSTEMI) after intravenous administration of 20 mg hyoscine butylbromide as premedication for colonoscopy. Coronary angiography showed no obstructive lesions. Main findings: Onset was sudden, 2 minutes after administration of hyoscine butylbromide, with oppressive retrosternal chest pain radiating to the jaw, dyspnea, diaphoresis and palpitations. Physical examination revealed marked hypotension and tachycardia. Electrocardiogram demonstrated new-onset atrial fibrillation without ischemic ST-T changes. High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly elevated and transthoracic echocardiography showed segmental wall-motion abnormalities of the basal anterolateral wall. Diagnosis, interventions and outcome: A diagnosis of type 2 NSTEMI secondary to unstable atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response-likely triggered by an adverse reaction to hyoscine butylbromide-was made. The patient underwent coronary catheterization without evidence of coronary stenosis. Management included hemodynamic support with intravenous fluids, beta-blocker therapy, statin therapy, initial antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation. She had a favorable clinical course and was discharged on a beta-blocker and oral anticoagulation. Conclusions: • Acute myocardial infarction may result from mechanisms other than atherosclerotic coronary obstruction, notably supply–demand mismatch. • Hyoscine butylbromide, although commonly associated with xerostomia, constipation and nausea, can be associated with serious cardiovascular adverse events that require prompt recognition and management. • Retrosternal chest pain requires a broad differential diagnosis (including pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndromes); an accurate and timely diagnostic approach is essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Se presenta el caso de una mujer en la octava década de la vida que desarrollo episodio de fibrilación auricular e infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del ST (IAMSEST) tipo 2 tras la administración intravenosa de 20 mg de butilbromuro de hioscina como premedicacion para colonoscopia sin hallazgos en la arteriografía coronaria. Hallazgos principales: Fue de inicio subito 2 minutos posteriores a la aplicación del butil bromuro hioscina iniciado como un dolor torácico retroesternal opresivo irradiado a mandíbula, disnea, diaforesis y palpitaciones. Al examen físico con hipotensión marcada y taquicardia. A los paraclínicos con evidencia de un electrocardiograma con fibrilación auricular de novo, no signos de isquemia. Troponina T ultrasensible con aumento significativo y ecocardiograma con trastornos segmentarios de la contractilidad basal anterolateral. Diagnósticos, intervenciones y resultados: Se considero un IAMSEST tipo 2 secundario a una fibrilación auricular con respuesta ventricular rápida inestable, secundario a una reacción adversa al butilbromuro de hioscina. Fue llevada a cateterismo coronario sin evidencia de estenosis coronaria por lo que se consideró manejo con líquidos endovenosos, betabloqueo, estatina, antiagregación inicial y anticoagulación. Adicionalmente por los hallazgos y la evolución favorable egreso con betabloqueador y anticoagulación oral. conclusión: • El infarto agudo de miocardio es una condición clínica que puede ser ocasionada por causas diferentes a la enfermedad coronaria, como cambios en la oferta y demanda de oxígeno miocárdico. • El butilbromuro de hioscina tiene efectos adversos que son más frecuentes como lo pueden ser xerostomía, constipación y nauseas, sin embargo, los efectos adversos cardiovasculares pueden ser presentados y tienen que ser manejados de manera adecuada. El dolor torácico retroesternal es un síntoma que puede ser atribuido a diferentes causas como lo es el tromboembolismo pulmonar o el infarto agudo de miocardio, a razón de esto es esencial el manejo y enfoque diagnostico acertado. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Portuguese): Relatamos o caso de uma mulher na oitava década de vida que desenvolveu fibrilação atrial e infarto agudo do miocárdio sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMSSST) tipo 2, após administração intravenosa de 20 mg de butilbrometo de hioscina como premedicação para colonoscopia. A angiografia coronária não revelou lesões obstrutivas. Achados principais: O início foi súbito, 2 minutos após a administração do butilbrometo de hioscina, manifestando-se por dor torácica retroesternal opressiva irradiada à mandíbula, dispneia, diaforese e palpitações. Ao exame físico havia hipotensão marcada e taquicardia. O eletrocardiograma evidenciou fibrilação atrial de novo sem alterações isquêmicas de ST–T. A troponina T de alta sensibilidade apresentou elevação significativa e o ecocardiograma transtorácico mostrou alterações segmentares do movimento parietal na região basal anterolateral. Diagnóstico, intervenções e evolução: Foi estabelecido diagnóstico de IAMSSST tipo 2 secundário a fibrilação atrial com resposta ventricular rápida instável, provavelmente desencadeada por reação adversa ao butilbrometo de hioscina. A paciente foi submetida a cateterismo coronário sem evidência de estenose coronária. A conduta incluiu suporte hemodinâmico com reposição volêmica endovenosa, betabloqueador, estatina, terapia antiplaquetária inicial e anticoagulação. Evoluiu favoravelmente e recebeu alta com betabloqueador e anticoagulação oral. Conclusões: • Infarto agudo do miocárdio pode decorrer de mecanismos distintos da doença aterosclerótica coronariana, como desequilíbrio entre oferta e demanda de oxigênio miocárdico. • Butilbrometo de hioscina, embora frequentemente associado a efeitos adversos como xerostomia, constipação e náuseas, pode provocar eventos cardiovasculares graves que exigem reconhecimento e manejo imediato. • A dor torácica retroesternal possui um amplo diagnóstico diferencial (incluindo tromboembolismo pulmonar e síndromes coronarianas agudas); portanto, uma abordagem diagnóstica rápida e precisa é essencial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Archivos de Medicina (1657-320X) is the property of Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:We report the case of a woman in her eighth decade who developed atrial fibrillation and a type 2 non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (type 2 NSTEMI) after intravenous administration of 20 mg hyoscine butylbromide as premedication for colonoscopy. Coronary angiography showed no obstructive lesions. Main findings: Onset was sudden, 2 minutes after administration of hyoscine butylbromide, with oppressive retrosternal chest pain radiating to the jaw, dyspnea, diaphoresis and palpitations. Physical examination revealed marked hypotension and tachycardia. Electrocardiogram demonstrated new-onset atrial fibrillation without ischemic ST-T changes. High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly elevated and transthoracic echocardiography showed segmental wall-motion abnormalities of the basal anterolateral wall. Diagnosis, interventions and outcome: A diagnosis of type 2 NSTEMI secondary to unstable atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response-likely triggered by an adverse reaction to hyoscine butylbromide-was made. The patient underwent coronary catheterization without evidence of coronary stenosis. Management included hemodynamic support with intravenous fluids, beta-blocker therapy, statin therapy, initial antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation. She had a favorable clinical course and was discharged on a beta-blocker and oral anticoagulation. Conclusions: • Acute myocardial infarction may result from mechanisms other than atherosclerotic coronary obstruction, notably supply–demand mismatch. • Hyoscine butylbromide, although commonly associated with xerostomia, constipation and nausea, can be associated with serious cardiovascular adverse events that require prompt recognition and management. • Retrosternal chest pain requires a broad differential diagnosis (including pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndromes); an accurate and timely diagnostic approach is essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:1657320X
DOI:10.30554/archmed.26.1.5465.2026%20