Recomendaciones para la utilización de listas de verificación según tipo de diseño utilizado en un estudio. Una forma de mejorar la calidad del reporte de un manuscrito científico.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Recomendaciones para la utilización de listas de verificación según tipo de diseño utilizado en un estudio. Una forma de mejorar la calidad del reporte de un manuscrito científico.
Alternate Title:	Recommendations for using checklists according to the type of study design used. A way to improve the quality of manuscript reporting.
Authors:	Manterola, Carlos^1,2,3 carlos.manterola@ufrontera.cl, Rivadeneira-Dueñas, Josué^2,4
Source:	Revista de Cirugia. 2026, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p445-450. 6p.
Abstract (English):	Objective: Reporting guidelines or checklists for scientific articles are essential tools for ensuring the appropriate presentation of manuscripts and help prevent omissions in manuscript structure. The aim of this manuscript was to describe the most frequently used checklists for communicating results in biomedical journals, according to the type of research design used. Conclusion: Before drafting a manuscript, authors should use a checklist appropriate to the methodological design of the study, as this facilitates its preparation, evaluation, and comprehension by the scientific community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish):	Objetivo: Las listas de verificación (LV) o checklists para artículos científicos son herramientas esenciales para asegurar la correcta presentación de los manuscritos y ayudan a evitar omisiones en la estructura. El objetivo de este manuscrito fue describir las LV de uso más frecuente para la comunicación de resultados en revistas biomédicas, según tipo de diseño de investigación utilizado. Conclusión: Antes de redactar un manuscrito, los autores debieran utilizar una LV acorde al diseño metodológico del estudio, pues ello facilita su preparación, evaluación y comprensión por parte de la comunidad científica. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Revista de Cirugia is the property of Sociedad de Cirujanos de Chile and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	MedicLatina

Description
Abstract:	Objective: Reporting guidelines or checklists for scientific articles are essential tools for ensuring the appropriate presentation of manuscripts and help prevent omissions in manuscript structure. The aim of this manuscript was to describe the most frequently used checklists for communicating results in biomedical journals, according to the type of research design used. Conclusion: Before drafting a manuscript, authors should use a checklist appropriate to the methodological design of the study, as this facilitates its preparation, evaluation, and comprehension by the scientific community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	24524557
DOI:	10.35687/s2452-454920260043190