Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model.
Authors: Soderberg CK; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Errington TM; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA., Schiavone SR; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA., Bottesini J; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA., Thorn FS; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Vazire S; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Esterling KM; Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA., Nosek BA; Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA. nosek@cos.io.; Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. nosek@cos.io.
Source: Nature human behaviour [Nat Hum Behav] 2021 Aug; Vol. 5 (8), pp. 990-997. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 24.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Observational Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal Info: Publisher: Springer Nature Publishing Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101697750 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2397-3374 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 23973374 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nat Hum Behav Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:2397-3374
DOI:10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4