The efficacy and safety of oral and vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone on women experiencing labor: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The efficacy and safety of oral and vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone on women experiencing labor: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials.
Authors: Ramadan M; Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt., Bashour G; Faculty of Medicine, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.; Cancer Research Center, Tishreen University Hospital, Latakia, Syria., Eldokmery E; Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Qalyubia, Egypt., Alkhawajah A; College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia., Alsalhi K; Faculty of Medicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia., Badr Y; Faculty of Medicine, Tishreen University, Tartous, Syria., Emad A; Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Sharquyah, Egypt., Labieb F; Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Source: Medicine [Medicine (Baltimore)] 2024 Oct 04; Vol. 103 (40), pp. e39861.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis
Journal Info: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 2985248R Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1536-5964 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00257974 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Medicine (Baltimore) Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039861