APA (7th ed.) Citation

WC, H., DM, K., AJ, G., J, S., & RM, R. (2026). Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validity. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 116, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2026.102123

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

WC, Higgins, Kaplan DM, Gillett AJ, Sutton J, and Ross RM. "Rethinking Psychological Measurement: Validity Potential Versus Realised Validity." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 116 (2026): 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2026.102123.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

WC, Higgins, et al. "Rethinking Psychological Measurement: Validity Potential Versus Realised Validity." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 116, 2026, p. 102123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2026.102123.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.