Comparing and validating different methods for olfactory threshold measurement in dogs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparing and validating different methods for olfactory threshold measurement in dogs.
Authors: Lambert CT; Canine Olfaction, Research, and Education Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, United States., Cupp GN; Canine Olfaction, Research, and Education Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, United States., Kane SA; Canine Olfaction, Research, and Education Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, United States., Medrano AC; Forensic Analytical Chemistry and Odor Profiling Laboratory, Department of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, United States., Prada-Tiedemann PA; Forensic Analytical Chemistry and Odor Profiling Laboratory, Department of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, United States., Aviles-Rosa EO; Canine Olfaction, Research, and Education Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, United States., Hall NJ; Canine Olfaction, Research, and Education Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, United States. Electronic address: Nathaniel.j.hall@ttu.edu.
Source: Behavioural processes [Behav Processes] 2026 Mar; Vol. 236, pp. 105343. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jan 26.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Comparative Study; Validation Study
Journal Info: Publisher: Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 7703854 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1872-8308 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03766357 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Behav Processes Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2026.105343