How flaws in study design and lead-time bias could affect the interpretation of data - Authors' reply.
Saved in:
| Title: | How flaws in study design and lead-time bias could affect the interpretation of data - Authors' reply. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Tang C; Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. Electronic address: ctang1@mdanderson.org., Sherry AD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Sun R; Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA., Tran P; Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA., Palma DA; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada., Ost P; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium. |
| Source: | The Lancet. Oncology [Lancet Oncol] 2026 May; Vol. 27 (5), pp. e235. |
| Publication Type: | Letter |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Lancet Pub. Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100957246 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1474-5488 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14702045 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Lancet Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE; In Process |
| Database: | MEDLINE Ultimate |
Be the first to leave a comment!
