(f)Utility of cEEG after cardiac arrest should not be judged by its unique prognostic contribution.
Saved in:
| Title: | (f)Utility of cEEG after cardiac arrest should not be judged by its unique prognostic contribution. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wieske L; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. l.wieske@amsterdamumc.nl., Doelkahar B; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Hoedemaekers CWE; Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Hofmeijer J; Department of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands., Blans MJ; Department of Intensive Care, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands., Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands., van Putten M; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands., Horn J; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., van Rootselaar AF; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. |
| Source: | Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2026 May 11; Vol. 30 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 May 11. |
| Publication Type: | Letter; Comment |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9801902 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1466-609X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13648535 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Crit Care Subsets: MEDLINE; In Process |
| Database: | MEDLINE Ultimate |
Be the first to leave a comment!
