Robotic versus traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): A dual-phase meta-analysis comparing human and AI-derived evidence.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Robotic versus traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): A dual-phase meta-analysis comparing human and AI-derived evidence.
Authors: Georginian N; Macquarie University Hospital, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, Australia., Wijeewera C; Bairnsdale Regional Health Service, East Gippsland, Victoria, NSW, 3875, Australia., Tran HT; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia., Wilson H; SurgicalXR, Suite 203, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109 Australia., Carney T; SurgicalXR, Suite 203, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109 Australia., Wilson MK; Macquarie University Hospital, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, Australia; SurgicalXR, Suite 203, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW, 2109 Australia., Preda VA; Macquarie University Hospital, 2 Technology Place Macquarie Park, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Suite 407, 2 Technology Place Sydney NSW 2109 Australia. Electronic address: veronica.preda@mq.edu.au.
Source: American journal of surgery [Am J Surg] 2026 Jun 11; Vol. 260, pp. 117072. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jun 11.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal Info: Publisher: Excerpta Medica Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0370473 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-1883 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00029610 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117072