APA (7th ed.) Citation

N, G., C, W., HT, T., H, W., T, C., MK, W., & VA, P. (2026). Robotic versus traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): A dual-phase meta-analysis comparing human and AI-derived evidence. American journal of surgery, 260, 117072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117072

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

N, Georginian, Wijeewera C, Tran HT, Wilson H, Carney T, Wilson MK, and Preda VA. "Robotic Versus Traditional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Dual-phase Meta-analysis Comparing Human and AI-derived Evidence." American Journal of Surgery 260 (2026): 117072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117072.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

N, Georginian, et al. "Robotic Versus Traditional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Dual-phase Meta-analysis Comparing Human and AI-derived Evidence." American Journal of Surgery, vol. 260, 2026, p. 117072, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117072.