View in EDS

Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices.
Authors:	McCABE, DAVID, Liptak, Adam
Source:	New York Times. 2/26/2024, Vol. 173 Issue 60076, pB1-B2. 2p.
Subjects:	Social media, Police, United States Capitol Insurrection, 2021, Communications industries, Mass media industry, Moody v. NetChoice LLC
Abstract:	The article reports on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the cases Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton on the way social media companies police their sites. Topics discussed include a challenge of the Texas and Florida laws which prohibit social media platforms from removing political content and from banning a candidate for office on their sites, respectively, the rights of social media firms under First Amendment and the government's influence on social media platforms.
Database:	Newspaper Source Plus

Description
Abstract:	The article reports on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the cases Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton on the way social media companies police their sites. Topics discussed include a challenge of the Texas and Florida laws which prohibit social media platforms from removing political content and from banning a candidate for office on their sites, respectively, the rights of social media firms under First Amendment and the government's influence on social media platforms.
ISSN:	03624331