Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices.
Saved in:
| Title: | Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | McCABE, DAVID, Liptak, Adam |
| Source: | New York Times. 2/26/2024, Vol. 173 Issue 60076, pB1-B2. 2p. |
| Subjects: | Social media, Police, United States Capitol Insurrection, 2021, Communications industries, Mass media industry, Moody v. NetChoice LLC |
| Abstract: | The article reports on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the cases Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton on the way social media companies police their sites. Topics discussed include a challenge of the Texas and Florida laws which prohibit social media platforms from removing political content and from banning a candidate for office on their sites, respectively, the rights of social media firms under First Amendment and the government's influence on social media platforms. |
| Database: | Newspaper Source Plus |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: n5h DbLabel: Newspaper Source Plus An: 175685252 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: News PubTypeId: newspaperArticle PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCABE%2C+DAVID%22">McCABE, DAVID</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liptak%2C+Adam%22">Liptak, Adam</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22New+York+Times%22">New York Times</searchLink>. 2/26/2024, Vol. 173 Issue 60076, pB1-B2. 2p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+media%22">Social media</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Police%22">Police</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States+Capitol+Insurrection%2C+2021%22">United States Capitol Insurrection, 2021</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communications+industries%22">Communications industries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mass+media+industry%22">Mass media industry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moody+v%2E+NetChoice+LLC%22">Moody v. NetChoice LLC</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The article reports on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the cases Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton on the way social media companies police their sites. Topics discussed include a challenge of the Texas and Florida laws which prohibit social media platforms from removing political content and from banning a candidate for office on their sites, respectively, the rights of social media firms under First Amendment and the government's influence on social media platforms. |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=n5h&AN=175685252 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 2 StartPage: B1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Social media Type: general – SubjectFull: Police Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Capitol Insurrection, 2021 Type: general – SubjectFull: Communications industries Type: general – SubjectFull: Mass media industry Type: general – SubjectFull: Moody v. NetChoice LLC Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Who Polices Social Media Is on Docket For Justices. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McCABE, DAVID – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Liptak, Adam IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 26 M: 02 Text: 2/26/2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03624331 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 173 – Type: issue Value: 60076 Titles: – TitleFull: New York Times Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |