Public Health Practice Is Not Research.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Public Health Practice Is Not Research.
Authors: Otto, Jean Lin (AUTHOR), Holodniy, Mark (AUTHOR), DeFraites, Robert F. (AUTHOR)
Source: American Journal of Public Health. Apr2014, Vol. 104 Issue 4, p596-602. 7p.
Subjects: Clinical medicine research, Public health surveillance, Prevention of communicable diseases, Epidemiology research methodology, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (U.S.), Conceptual structures, Emergency management, Public health administration, Reaction time, United States. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Professional practice, Government regulation, Research, Human research subjects, Medical laws, Safety
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Scientific and clinical activities undertaken by public health agencies may be misconstrued as medical research. Most discussions of regulatory and legal oversight of medical research focus on activities involving either patients in clinical practice or volunteers in clinical trials. These discussions often exclude similar activities that constitute or support core functions of public health practice. As a result, public health agencies and practitioners may be held to inappropriate regulatory standards regarding research. Through the lens of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, and using several case studies from these departments, we offer a framework for the adjudication of activities common to research and public health practice that could assist public health practitioners, research oversight authorities, and scientific journals in determining whether such activities require regulatory review and approval as research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Scientific and clinical activities undertaken by public health agencies may be misconstrued as medical research. Most discussions of regulatory and legal oversight of medical research focus on activities involving either patients in clinical practice or volunteers in clinical trials. These discussions often exclude similar activities that constitute or support core functions of public health practice. As a result, public health agencies and practitioners may be held to inappropriate regulatory standards regarding research. Through the lens of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, and using several case studies from these departments, we offer a framework for the adjudication of activities common to research and public health practice that could assist public health practitioners, research oversight authorities, and scientific journals in determining whether such activities require regulatory review and approval as research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00900036
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301663