The law (and politics) of safe injection facilities in the United States.
Saved in:
| Title: | The law (and politics) of safe injection facilities in the United States. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Beletsky L (AUTHOR), Davis CS (AUTHOR), Anderson E (AUTHOR), Burris S (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | American Journal of Public Health. Feb2008, Vol. 98 Issue 2, p231-237. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Injections, Public health, Medical care of people with drug addiction, Intravenous drug abusers, Pharmaceutical policy, Equipment & supplies, Safety |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Safe injection facilities (SIFs) have shown promise in reducing harms and social costs associated with injection drug use. Favorable evaluations elsewhere have raised the issue of their implementation in the United States. Recognizing that laws shape health interventions targeting drug users, we analyzed the legal environment for publicly authorized SIFs in the United States. Although states and some municipalities have the power to authorize SIFs under state law, federal authorities could still interfere with these facilities under the Controlled Substances Act. A state- or locally-authorized SIF could proceed free of legal uncertainty only if federal authorities explicitly authorized it or decided not to interfere. Given legal uncertainty, and the similar experience with syringe exchange programs, we recommend a process of sustained health research, strategic advocacy, and political deliberation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Safe injection facilities (SIFs) have shown promise in reducing harms and social costs associated with injection drug use. Favorable evaluations elsewhere have raised the issue of their implementation in the United States. Recognizing that laws shape health interventions targeting drug users, we analyzed the legal environment for publicly authorized SIFs in the United States. Although states and some municipalities have the power to authorize SIFs under state law, federal authorities could still interfere with these facilities under the Controlled Substances Act. A state- or locally-authorized SIF could proceed free of legal uncertainty only if federal authorities explicitly authorized it or decided not to interfere. Given legal uncertainty, and the similar experience with syringe exchange programs, we recommend a process of sustained health research, strategic advocacy, and political deliberation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00900036 |
| DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.2006.103747 |
