Human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity among members of the active duty US Army 1985-89.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity among members of the active duty US Army 1985-89.
Authors: Kelley PW (AUTHOR), Miller RN (AUTHOR), Pomerantz R (AUTHOR), Wann F (AUTHOR), Brundage JF (AUTHOR), Burke DS (AUTHOR)
Source: American Journal of Public Health. Apr90, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p405-410. 6p.
Subjects: HIV antibodies, HIV prevention, Public health, Ethnic groups, Age factors in disease, Gender, Medical personnel, Ratio analysis, Multivariate analysis, United States. Army
Abstract: Between October 1985 and June 1989, most active duty US Army soldiers were screened for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody. Of 648,032 screened soldiers in this analysis, 1,588 were HIV-antibody positive. In a multivariate analysis, correlates of positivity included: age [Adjusted Odds Ratios (ref < 20 years) = 20-24 years, 3.7; 25-29, 9.3; 30-34, 15.7; > or = to 35, 15.9]; being male, [4.2]; being Black or Hispanic (vs white) [3.7 and 3.0, respectively]; being single (vs married) [3.8]; assignment to an HIV endemic location [1.7], and having a medical occupation [2.7, 2.7, and 2.6 for negligible, low, and high blood exposure professions, respectively]. Seropositivity rate ratios for medical vs non-medical personnel were 0.7 [95% CI = 0.4, 1.4] for females and 2.9 [95% CI = 2.5, 3.3] for males. For male medical personnel, being single (vs married) correlated strongly with antibody positivity [prevalence ratio = 3.4, 95% CI = 2.6, 4.6]. Excess HIV risk among medical personnel appeared largely attributable to factors other than occupational exposures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first